JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 18, 2025

Private security firms added to police patrols

by

Renuka Singh
1927 days ago
20200407

Gov­ern­ment has reignit­ed the Com­mu­ni­ty Com­fort Pa­trol (CCP) ini­tia­tive pi­lot­ed by Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice Gary Grif­fith in 2014 when he was the Min­is­ter of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty, to as­sist po­lice of­fi­cers dur­ing the Stay-at-Home pe­ri­od.

How­ev­er, the Min­istry said that “the pa­trols be­ing pro­vid­ed by the pri­vate se­cu­ri­ty firms, have no ad­di­tion­al pow­ers out­side of their nor­mal pow­ers as pri­vate se­cu­ri­ty of­fi­cers, per­form­ing pri­vate neigh­bour­hood pa­trols.”

Cur­rent Min­is­ter of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Stu­art Young said that the four pri­vate se­cu­ri­ty com­pa­nies--Amal­ga­mat­ed, Al­lied, In­no­v­a­tive Tech­nolo­gies and Pro­tec­tive Agen­cies--were the same ones se­lect­ed back in 2014 when the CCP ini­tia­tive was launched.

“The iden­ti­cal neigh­bour­hoods se­lect­ed in 2014 to be pa­trolled are the ones be­ing pa­trolled and im­por­tant­ly this is be­ing done at a cheap­er cost than 2014,” Young said.

He did not re­spond to sub­se­quent ques­tions about the cost of the ini­tia­tive.

Be­fore Young con­firmed that the CCP pro­gramme was re­vi­talised, Guardian Me­dia re­ceived a copy of in­struc­tions giv­en to po­lice which in­struct­ed of­fi­cers to “sup­ply one of­fi­cer to pa­trol with Amal­ga­mat­ed Se­cu­ri­ty in your dis­trict from 8 pm to 11 pm and one of­fi­cer from 2 am to 5 am. You are al­so to in­form NDOC of the pa­trol, its du­ra­tion, the ve­hi­cle num­ber and call sign.”

Be­fore the Min­istry con­firmed that four com­pa­nies were re­tained, Guardian Me­dia re­ceived re­ports from res­i­dents at a pri­vate hous­ing com­plex in Cunu­pia, Sa­van­nah Vil­las in Aran­juez and from res­i­dents in Ari­ma that Amal­ga­mat­ed se­cu­ri­ty ve­hi­cles were slow­ly pa­trolling the area, some with flash­ing lights.

The lack of com­mu­ni­ca­tion to the pub­lic caused pan­ic at Sa­van­nah Vil­las on Mon­day night when Amal­ga­mat­ed se­cu­ri­ty per­son­nel at­tempt­ed to en­ter the com­pound and was de­nied en­try by com­pound se­cu­ri­ty. Ac­cord­ing to in­for­ma­tion ob­tained by Guardian Me­dia, the po­lice lat­er in­formed com­pound se­cu­ri­ty that the pri­vate se­cu­ri­ty firm was part of the State’s “com­fort pa­trol”.

Guardian Me­dia then sent the fol­low­ing ques­tions to the Young, the Per­ma­nent Sec­re­tary at the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty, At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Faris-Al Rawi and Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley in his ca­pac­i­ty as head of the Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Coun­cil.

1. What does the pro­vi­sion of com­fort pa­trol en­tail?

2. When was Amal­ga­mat­ed re­tained by the State/Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty?

3. What is the du­ra­tion of this con­tract/agree­ment?

4. Is Amal­ga­mat­ed util­is­ing its pri­vate ve­hi­cles for this ser­vice or are they ac­com­pa­ny­ing of­fi­cers in po­lice ve­hi­cles?

5. What is the cost of this con­tract?

6. Has any oth­er pri­vate se­cu­ri­ty com­pa­ny been en­gaged to as­sist or is this sole­ly an agree­ment be­tween the state and ASSL?

While there was no re­sponse from the min­is­ters and the Prime Min­is­ter, the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty is­sued a me­dia state­ment con­firm­ing that pa­trols had be­gun and would last un­til May 5, 2020.

Di­rec­tor of the Amal­ga­mat­ed Se­cu­ri­ty Ser­vices Ltd (ASSL) John Aboud and man­ag­ing di­rec­tor of Al­lied Se­cu­ri­ty Michael Nicholas both con­firmed that their re­spec­tive com­pa­ny has been re­tained by the Gov­ern­ment.

Guardian Me­dia con­tact­ed both Aboud and Nicholas be­fore the Min­istry’s con­fir­ma­tion.

Aboud yes­ter­day con­firmed that the com­pa­ny was re­tained by the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty and di­rect­ed all ques­tions to that Min­istry.

“Those ques­tions re­al­ly should be di­rect­ed to the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty,” he said.

“All I can tell you is that there are a num­ber of se­cu­ri­ty com­pa­nies in­volved in the ex­er­cise, it is not Amal­ga­mat­ed alone, sev­er­al com­pa­nies are in­volved in this ini­tia­tive by the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty,” Aboud said.

“Oth­er than that I am not at lib­er­ty to tell you much be­cause the client would have to tell you about it but the ex­er­cise to keep eyes and ears out there,” he said adding that “sev­er­al com­pa­nies in­volved”.

Aboud said he com­mu­ni­cat­ed with the Min­istry of Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty af­ter ques­tions from Guardian Me­dia.

“The Min­istry should an­swer you, I sent an email and I’m telling them that the press is ask­ing us ques­tions and I asked them to give us di­rec­tions,” he said.

“I am hap­py to an­swer all the ques­tions be­cause there is noth­ing un­to­ward in terms of not be­ing able to an­swer but out of re­spect for the client, I think they client should an­swer, be­cause I think what they’re do­ing is a good thing,” he said.

Nicholas con­firmed the new arrange­ment.

“It is sim­ply a re-es­tab­lish­ment of a pre­vi­ous ex­er­cise we did for the gov­ern­ment a few years ago,” he said.

“It’s on­ly short term,” Nicholas said.

He said the se­cu­ri­ty com­pa­nies were ex­pect­ed to as­sist with help­ing en­force some of the new re­stric­tions brought on by the COVID-19 is­sue.

The Min­istry did not say what this ini­tia­tive is cost­ing the State.

“This ini­tia­tive is be­ing em­ployed in or­der to en­hance the na­tion­al se­cu­ri­ty re­sponse and sup­port re­cent mea­sures in­sti­tut­ed by the Gov­ern­ment,” the re­lease said.

The ini­tia­tive is ex­pect­ed to “mit­i­gate the spread of the COVID-19 virus”.

“These pa­trols shall be con­duct­ed in res­i­den­tial com­mu­ni­ties us­ing marked ve­hi­cles and shall main­tain re­al-time com­mu­ni­ca­tions with the Na­tion­al Op­er­a­tions Fu­sion Cen­tre (NOFC),” the re­lease stat­ed.

“This ini­tia­tive will be mon­i­tored for qual­i­ty and its op­er­at­ing pa­ra­me­ters ad­just­ed ac­cord­ing­ly as nec­es­sary,” the press state­ment said.

Grif­fith, in a sub­se­quent in­ter­view, said that the se­cu­ri­ty of­fi­cers were not pro­vid­ed with any new au­thor­i­ty. They were in­struct­ed to pa­trol is res­i­den­tial ar­eas, out­side of the known “hot-spots” and to call the po­lice di­rect­ly if need be.

He al­so said that all se­cu­ri­ty per­son­nel must check-in at the dis­trict po­lice sta­tions to log in with their name, area of pa­trol and du­ra­tion of pa­trol.

“They were not giv­en any ad­di­tion­al au­thor­i­ty. They will act as a de­ter­rent be­cause of the high vis­i­bil­i­ty and would act as ad­di­tion­al eyes and ears with­in com­mu­ni­ties,” he said.

“The TTPS was asked to pa­trol and lock down the en­tire coun­try and they are help­ing us keep an eye out,” he said.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored