JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Prosecution insists on lengthy jail sentence for former Suriname president

by

727 days ago
20230531
Desi Bouterse

Desi Bouterse

The Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tion Ser­vice (OM) is in­sist­ing that for­mer pres­i­dent De­si Bouterse be jailed for 20 years for his in­volve­ment in the mur­der of 15 peo­ple in the Dutch-speak­ing Caribbean Com­mu­ni­ty (CARI­COM) coun­try on De­cem­ber 8, 1982.

But Bouterse’s at­tor­ney, Irvin Kan­hai, has asked the Court of Jus­tice to ac­quit his client.

He said the pros­e­cu­tion and court-mar­tial have “un­for­tu­nate­ly con­tin­ued to re­peat a sto­ry of mur­der­ous sol­diers and in­no­cent vic­tims, who were killed in a most bru­tal way be­cause they did not want the dic­ta­tor­ship of the mil­i­tary and want­ed to bring about a re­turn to democ­ra­cy”.

In Au­gust 2021, the Court Mar­tial of Suri­name up­held the 2019 mil­i­tary court rul­ing of a 20-year jail term on Bouterse fol­low­ing a tri­al that had been go­ing on for sev­er­al years.

In 2017, Bouterse along with 23 co-de­fen­dants had ap­peared in the Mil­i­tary Court af­ter the Court of Jus­tice had ear­li­er re­ject­ed a mo­tion to stop the tri­al.

On Tues­day, act­ing At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Astrid Ni­a­mut re­it­er­at­ed ear­li­er ar­gu­ments that Bouterse, who was the mil­i­tary ruler of the coun­try at the time of the mur­ders, must be held re­spon­si­ble for the killings and that enough ev­i­dence had been pro­vid­ed dur­ing the tri­al.

She ar­gued dur­ing the crim­i­nal pro­ceed­ings against Bouterse and co-de­fen­dants Ernst Gef­fery, Iwan Dijk­steel, Stephanus Sen­sor and Ben­ny Bron­den­stein that this is why the Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tion Ser­vice al­so de­mand­ed Bouterse’s im­pris­on­ment.

The act­ing At­tor­ney Gen­er­al said that Bouterse has nev­er ex­pressed re­gret to the rel­a­tives of the vic­tims. Nor did he him­self want to pro­vide any in­sight in­to what ex­act­ly hap­pened on De­cem­ber 8, 1982.

The for­mer mil­i­tary of­fi­cers and civil­ians had been charged with the De­cem­ber 8, 1982, mur­ders of 15 men that in­clud­ed jour­nal­ists, mil­i­tary of­fi­cers, union lead­ers, lawyers, busi­ness­men, and uni­ver­si­ty lec­tur­ers.

The pros­e­cu­tion had al­leged that the men were ar­rest­ed on the nights of De­cem­ber 7 and 8 and trans­ferred to Fort Zee­landia, the then head­quar­ters of the Suri­namese Na­tion­al Army.

They said the men were tor­tured and sum­mar­i­ly ex­e­cut­ed.

The Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tion Ser­vice ar­gued that Bouterse, who al­so served as head of state from 2010-2020, act­ed with pre­med­i­ta­tion and that there was suf­fi­cient time dur­ing vic­tims be­ing shot and their bod­ies col­lect­ed for him to have thought about the killings.

The pros­e­cu­tion ar­gued that the pris­on­ers were not all killed at the same time, but at dif­fer­ent times.

“Every­thing points to calm de­lib­er­a­tion and calm de­lib­er­a­tion,” the pros­e­cu­tor said, not­ing the fact that Bouterse had stat­ed on ra­dio and TV that the vic­tims had been shot while flee­ing, but that the court was lat­er told the killings took place when the lead­er­ship of the mil­i­tary was in the hands of Paul Bhag­wan­das shows the “cool­ness of the ac­cused ”

Un­like pre­vi­ous oc­ca­sions, Bouterse ar­rived ear­ly at the court build­ing telling re­porters that he had come to lis­ten to the mat­ter as a cour­tesy to the pros­e­cu­tion.

“Peo­ple are try­ing to present the mat­ter dif­fer­ent­ly from what the ac­tu­al sit­u­a­tion has been. The OM does not un­der­stand what is go­ing on at all. They put the em­pha­sis wrong,” he told re­porters.

Kan­hai, says he is “tired of the per­se­cu­tion’s crazi­ness.

“I’m tired of lis­ten­ing to the per­se­cu­tion’s crazi­ness. If you look at the case on its mer­its, so far in all the pro­ceed­ings there has been no clar­i­ty about what hap­pened in the fort on De­cem­ber 7, 8 and 9, 1982. Ab­solute­ly no clar­i­ty has come.

“The clar­i­ty has not come be­cause you should not as­sume that sol­diers have to prac­tice shoot­ing some­one from two me­ters away. As a sol­dier, you don’t need a drill for that. So some­thing hap­pened that we can’t ex­plain and we didn’t make any ef­fort to ex­plain it.

“So when I hear the pros­e­cu­tion of­fi­cer say that there were shoot­ing ex­er­cis­es… well that’s on his laugh­able, to say the least. Be­cause as a sol­dier you ab­solute­ly do not have to prac­tice shoot­ing some­one from two me­ters away. A child of five can do that too,” the lawyer told re­porters.

The streets lead­ing to the cour­t­house were, as al­ways, cor­doned off and guard­ed by se­cu­ri­ty forces.

PARA­MARI­BO, Suri­name, CMC


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored