Jesse Ramdeo
A motion to extend the State of Emergency (SoE) for a second time was passed in the House of Representatives on Friday with 27 Government votes in favour and 12 Opposition votes against. There were no abstentions.
The approval grants the Government an additional three months of enhanced emergency powers, despite fierce objections from the Opposition benches.
Attorney General John Jeremie, who piloted the motion, insisted the SoE remained a critical national-security instrument to support active operations targeting criminal gangs and organised crime networks.
He stressed that the measure was never intended to serve as the Government’s crime-fighting strategy, but rather as a temporary platform enabling law-enforcement agencies to execute sensitive and ongoing tactical initiatives.
He noted that a decline in murders since the SoE was declared, though not its primary purpose, signaled disruption across criminal landscapes.
Opposition MP Keith Scotland, leading the response for his bench, condemned the request for the extension, accusing the Government of failing to present data or meaningful evidence to justify the move. He charged that the SoE was instead being used to “mask incompetence and inefficiencies” in crime management and argued that the population deserved transparency.
Jeremie pushed back, asserting that revealing operational details would compromise sensitive intelligence, risk national-security efforts, and endanger security personnel.
In winding up debate, the Attorney General reiterated that security officials “need time to build on their initial successes” and warned that prematurely lifting the SoE could stall momentum and allow criminal organisations to regroup.
With the motion now approved, the extended emergency powers will remain in effect, pending review at the end of the next three-month period.
