JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, June 19, 2025

Starting all over again! Retrial for two accused of murdering 6-year-old Sean Luke

by

Derek Achong
1066 days ago
20220719

Two men, ac­cused of bru­tal­ly mur­der­ing six-year-old Sean Luke over 16 years ago when they were teenagers, will have to face a re­tri­al.

Ap­pel­late Judges Nolan Bereaux, Mark Mo­hammed and Maria Wil­son or­dered the re­tri­al for Akeel Mitchell and Richard Cha­too yes­ter­day, af­ter up­hold­ing their ap­peal over their con­vic­tions based on con­ces­sions by the Of­fice of the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions (DPP).

At the start of the hear­ing, Deputy DPP George Bus­by said that the DPP’s Of­fice had to con­cede four of the sev­en grounds of ap­peal raised by the duo’s lawyers, based on a deep analy­sis of the ev­i­dence in the case.

“We feel that we are un­able to de­fend those grounds with the re­sult that the State has to con­cede in this ap­peal,” Bus­by said.

Bus­by ad­mit­ted that High Court Judge Lisa Ram­sumair-Hinds made sev­er­al er­rors when she presided over the duo’s vir­tu­al judge-alone tri­al last year, which re­sult­ed in a se­ri­ous mis­car­riage of jus­tice.

De­spite the po­si­tion, Bus­by sug­gest­ed that the DPP’s Of­fice was sym­pa­thet­ic to Jus­tice Ram­sumair-Hinds based on the com­plex­i­ty of the case.

“This was ob­vi­ous­ly a very dif­fi­cult tri­al and by no means was it sim­ple. One can have em­pa­thy for the task that the learned tri­al judge had to face,” he said.

Pre­sent­ing sub­mis­sions on whether the duo should face a re­tri­al, pros­e­cu­tor Sab­ri­na Dougdeen-Jaglal called on the judges to con­sid­er the “tremen­dous” pub­lic in­ter­est in the case.

“Cas­es that are known by the per­son that dies rather than the ac­cused per­sons are the ones that every­one in this coun­try re­mem­bers,” Dougdeen-Jaglal said.

At­tor­ney Jagdeo Singh, who led the duo’s le­gal team and first raised the is­sues with Jus­tice Ram­sumair-Hinds’ han­dling of the case, did not op­pose the move to have a re­tri­al.

“As of­fi­cers of the court, we can­not rea­son­ably ar­gue that there should not be a re­tri­al in the case,” Singh said.

As part of their de­ci­sion, the ap­peal pan­el or­dered that the case be list­ed for case man­age­ment be­fore an­oth­er judge on or be­fore next Mon­day.

Luke, of Hen­ry Street, Or­ange Val­ley Road in Cou­va, went miss­ing on the evening of March 26, 2006, and his de­com­pos­ing body was found two days lat­er.

An au­top­sy re­vealed that he died from in­ter­nal in­juries and bleed­ing aris­ing out of be­ing sodomised with sug­ar­cane stalk.

Cha­too and Mitchell, who is the step­son of Cha­too’s broth­er, were charged with the crime.

Dur­ing the tri­al, State pros­e­cu­tors led the ev­i­dence of teenagers Avinash Ba­boolal and Arvis Pradeep, who claimed that Cha­too had in­vit­ed Luke to ac­com­pa­ny them on a fish­ing ex­pe­di­tion.

Both Ba­boolal and Pradeep claimed that they saw Luke, Cha­too and Mitchell en­ter an aban­doned sug­ar­cane field, where Luke’s body was even­tu­al­ly found, with on­ly Cha­too and Mitchell emerg­ing.

How­ev­er, while Ba­boolal claimed that they en­tered the field on their way to the riv­er, Pradeep claimed the di­ver­sion came when they were re­turn­ing.

In con­vict­ing the duo, Jus­tice Ram­sumair-Hinds re­ject­ed a video-record­ed con­fes­sion state­ment, in which Cha­too im­pli­cat­ed him­self and Mitchell.

In the record­ing, Cha­too claimed that Mitchell, who was spend­ing time at his home, re­quest­ed that he (Mitchell) have sex with him.

Ac­cord­ing to Cha­too, af­ter he re­fused, he re­luc­tant­ly agreed to Mitchell’s re­quest to in­tro­duce him to Luke, who was his (Cha­too) neigh­bour.

Cha­too claimed that he mere­ly held Luke’s hands and cov­ered his mouth as Mitchell raped him and sodomised him with the sug­ar­cane stalk.

How­ev­er, Cha­too elect­ed to tes­ti­fy in his de­fence dur­ing the tri­al and claimed that he fab­ri­cat­ed the con­fes­sion, as he was threat­ened and co­erced by homi­cide de­tec­tives.

Cha­too de­nied any wrong­do­ing and claimed that Mitchell did not ac­com­pa­ny the group on the fish­ing trip. He al­so sought to sug­gest that Ba­boolal may have been the per­pe­tra­tor.

Pros­e­cu­tors al­so led DNA ev­i­dence which showed that Mitchell’s se­men was found on Luke’s dis­card­ed un­der­wear.

In the ap­peal, the duo’s lawyers claimed that Jus­tice Ram­sumair-Hinds did not prop­er­ly con­sid­er the le­gal is­sue of joint en­ter­prise by rul­ing out Cha­too’s state­ment, which was the on­ly ev­i­dence sug­gest­ing the role of both Cha­too and Mitchell in the crime.

They claimed that the judge should have con­sid­ered manslaugh­ter or felony mur­der for Cha­too, as the ev­i­dence did not in­di­cate that he had the in­tent to mur­der Luke or as­sist in do­ing so.

While Bus­by and Dougdeen-Jaglal con­ced­ed some of the grounds, Bus­by main­tained that Jus­tice Ram­sumair-Hinds did prop­er­ly con­sid­er Ba­boolal’s ev­i­dence and cred­i­bil­i­ty.

The ap­peal pan­el did not agree, as it point­ed out the judge failed to demon­strate how she con­sid­ered se­ri­ous in­con­sis­ten­cies in Ba­boolal’s ev­i­dence.

As they were mi­nors when they al­leged­ly com­mit­ted the crime, Mitchell and Cha­too were sen­tenced at the court’s plea­sure and were or­dered to serve manda­to­ry min­i­mum terms of 33 years and 27 years re­spec­tive­ly, when they were con­vict­ed by Jus­tice Ram­sumair-Hinds in Ju­ly last year.

If un­suc­cess­ful in their ap­peal, Mitchell and Cha­too would have been el­i­gi­ble to be con­sid­ered for re­lease in 17 and a half years and 11 and a half years re­spec­tive­ly, as the time they spent on re­mand be­fore be­ing con­vict­ed was de­duct­ed from their sen­tences.

The duo was al­so rep­re­sent­ed by Vashisht Seep­er­sad, Richard Jag­gas­sar, Alyssa Seecha­ran, Sav­it­ri Sama­roo, Vere-Marie Khan, Shane Pa­tience and Khadi­ja Sinanan.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored