JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, August 18, 2025

State to pay suspended cop for false imprisonment

by

1390 days ago
20211027
L to R: Inspector Rajesh Gokool; and attorney-at-law Kevin Ratiram.

L to R: Inspector Rajesh Gokool; and attorney-at-law Kevin Ratiram.

SASCHA WIL­SON

 

The state now has to pay dam­ages to a sus­pend­ed po­lice­man af­ter he was false­ly im­pris­oned for four days fol­low­ing his ar­rest last year. 

While In­spec­tor Ra­jesh Gokool was sub­se­quent­ly charged with con­spir­a­cy to per­vert the course of pub­lic jus­tice, Jus­tice Devin­dra Ram­per­sad ruled that his de­ten­tion for four of the sev­en days he was in cus­tody was un­law­ful. 

Gokool, through his at­tor­ney Kevin Rati­ram, sued the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al for wrong­ful ar­rest and false im­pris­on­ment last Au­gust. 

In the court doc­u­ments, Gokool said around 4 am on March 2nd, 2020, he and his fam­i­ly were awok­en when a par­ty of of­fi­cers, in­clud­ing Ag Cpl Mar­cano of the Pro­fes­sion­al Stan­dards Bu­reau (PSB), came to his La Ro­maine home.  Mar­cano in­formed Gokool he was in­ves­ti­gat­ing the dis­ap­pear­ance of a DVR that had been seized from the premis­es of Mustapha Khan. The of­fi­cer fur­ther stat­ed that it was al­leged that Gokool had or­dered the DVD's re­moval with in­tent to con­ceal ev­i­dence and that he lat­er sub­mit­ted a wrong DVR to the Cy­ber Crime Unit.

Gokool claimed he was ar­rest­ed in front of his fam­i­ly, in­clud­ing his four-year-old daugh­ter, and his neigh­bours. Gokool, ac­cord­ing to the court doc­u­ments, was tak­en to the Mal­oney Po­lice Sta­tion and placed in a cell even though he was charged with any­thing. He start­ed hav­ing breath­ing dif­fi­cul­ty and com­plained to of­fi­cers on du­ty.  Fol­low­ing this, he was tak­en to the Pin­to Po­lice Post, where he was placed in a room.  The fol­low­ing day around 9:30 am, Mar­cano and Cpl Bisses­sar from the PSB ar­rived at the post and in­ter­viewed Gokool un­til 12 pm.  Around 8 am on March 4, 2020, Cpl Bisses­sar told him that he was be­ing fur­ther de­tained. Gokool asked to be re­leased pend­ing fur­ther in­ves­ti­ga­tions, but he re­fused and left.

On March 5, 2020, Gokool was in­formed that he would be placed on an iden­ti­fi­ca­tion pa­rade.    Around 5:30 am on March 6, 2020, Gokool was tak­en to the La Hor­quet­ta Po­lice Sta­tion and placed in an en­closed room.  Lat­er that morn­ing, he asked an of­fi­cer about the arrange­ments for his iden­ti­fi­ca­tion pa­rade, and he was told that it would take place at 5 pm.  At 6.30 pm, Ag In­spec­tor Joseph in­formed Gokool that he had been ap­point­ed as the iden­ti­fi­ca­tion pa­rade of­fi­cer, but the pa­rade did not take place. The next day, March 7, Gokool was tak­en to Trinci­ty Mall, where a Group Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion was done in the food court.  Gokool was tak­en back to the La Hor­quet­ta Po­lice Sta­tion and moved to the Besson Street Po­lice Sta­tion that night. 

Around 3:00 pm on March 9, Gokool be­gan ex­pe­ri­enc­ing short­ness of breath, numb­ness in his legs and chest pains. He was tak­en to the Port-of-Spain Gen­er­al Hos­pi­tal via am­bu­lance. He was ex­am­ined by a doc­tor who found that he was suf­fer­ing from anx­i­ety. Gokool was tak­en back to the sta­tion and lat­er that night his wife ap­plied for a Writ of Habeas Cor­pus.  

Fol­low­ing his ap­pear­ance be­fore Jus­tice Mar­garet Mo­hammed at the Hall of Jus­tice on March 9, 2020, the judge or­dered that the Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice re­lease him by 7 pm if he was not charged.  Around 6:20 pm, he was re­leased on the ad­vice of the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions.

Gokool claimed he suf­fered ex­treme trau­ma, dis­tress, hu­mil­i­a­tion and em­bar­rass­ment due to his ar­rest and de­ten­tion. Dur­ing his time in cus­tody, he claimed he suf­fered a loss of ap­petite, had great dif­fi­cul­ty sleep­ing, and of­ten ex­pe­ri­enced night­mares. 

Gokool was re-ar­rest­ed and charged with con­spir­a­cy to per­vert the course of pub­lic jus­tice in June 2020 and that mat­ter is still pend­ing. 

Gokool's at­tor­ney made an ap­pli­ca­tion to strike out the state's de­fence on the ba­sis that it dis­closed no grounds for de­fend­ing the claim, and in par­tic­u­lar, it did not jus­ti­fy the length of Gokool's de­ten­tion.   Rati­ram al­so ar­gued that the ID pa­rade was not nec­es­sary but sub­mit­ted that if the court found the pa­rade was nec­es­sary, the po­lice should have com­plet­ed in­ter­view­ing Gokool and the ID pa­rade held, no lat­er than the morn­ing of March 4.  

In his rul­ing, the judge agreed with Rati­ram's sub­mis­sion that the de­fence did not jus­ti­fy the length of Gokool's de­ten­tion, but he found that the ID pa­rade was nec­es­sary.  How­ev­er, the judge ruled that the po­lice should have placed Gokool on the pa­rade no lat­er than the evening of March 5, adding that the de­lay in con­duct­ing the ID Pa­rade was un­rea­son­able.

Ram­per­sad ruled that Gokool's de­ten­tion from March 5 to March 9 was un­law­ful and or­dered that the De­fence in re­spect of that pe­ri­od be struck out. 

The mat­ter was ad­journed to Feb­ru­ary 18, 2022, for the as­sess­ment of dam­ages.

Rati­ram sub­se­quent­ly sought leave to with­draw the claim for wrong­ful ar­rest, and false im­pris­on­ment for the pe­ri­od March 2 to 4.30 pm on March 5th, 2020. 

The State was rep­re­sent­ed by Ebo Jones, and Ryan Grant.

CourtAttorney GeneralTTPS


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored