JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 25, 2025

Suruj on Point highway project

'Hands clean, heart pure'

by

Shaliza Hassanali
2162 days ago
20190824
Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar and Suruj Rambahan at UNC meeting in Gasparillo earlier this month.

Opposition Leader Kamla Persad-Bissessar and Suruj Rambahan at UNC meeting in Gasparillo earlier this month.

Rishi Ragoonath

When the 2020 gen­er­al elec­tion bell rings, Tabaquite MP Dr Su­ruj Ram­bachan will not be an op­po­nent on the po­lit­i­cal stage.

Ram­bachan bowed out re­cent­ly af­ter spend­ing 52 years of his life in pol­i­tics.

Ram­bachan, 70, will not seek re-elec­tion with the Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC), which he served and helped to build, but will be a men­tor to the youth of the par­ty un­der the lead­er­ship of Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar.

He made the an­nounce­ment two weeks ago at a po­lit­i­cal meet­ing host­ed by the UNC in Gas­par­il­lo.

Dur­ing his five decades in pol­i­tics, Ram­bachan wore many hats—from am­bas­sador to Brazil, MP, Ch­agua­nas may­or, Sen­ate mi­nor­i­ty leader, and deputy po­lit­i­cal leader of the UNC.

Ram­bachan was al­so as­signed three min­is­te­r­i­al port­fo­lios dur­ing his 2010 to 2015 term un­der Per­sad-Bisses­sar—For­eign Af­fairs, Lo­cal Gov­ern­ment, and Works and In­fra­struc­ture.

In 2014, he al­so act­ed as prime min­is­ter.

On Mon­day, the Sun­day Guardian sat down with Ram­bachan at his con­stituen­cy of­fice in Gas­par­il­lo to talk about his po­lit­i­cal life, chal­lenges, the UNC's mis­steps, and the way for­ward.

Has­sanali: How would you de­scribe your 52 years in pol­i­tics?

Ram­bachan: It has been an ex­cit­ing and sat­is­fy­ing 52 years. I al­so think that with­out pow­er one is not able to help peo­ple in a very con­struc­tive way. I used pow­er al­ways for the ben­e­fit of the peo­ple. To me, that is very sat­is­fy­ing. I al­so know what it is not to be in of­fice and not to have pow­er. I would say those were some ter­ri­fy­ing mo­ments when peo­ple de­pend­ed on you but you re­al­ly could not de­liv­er to them. The last four years the con­stituen­cy of Tabaquite has been like that, where peo­ple ex­pect­ed the same lev­el of per­for­mance and de­liv­ery be­tween 2010 and 2015. The re­sponse of the Gov­ern­ment has not been forth­com­ing.

What has been your most chal­leng­ing task as a politi­cian?

I don't see any­thing as a chal­lenge but an op­por­tu­ni­ty to learn. If you ap­proach life with an at­ti­tude of learn­ing you will not be dis­ap­point­ed. When I lost the elec­tion in 1981 and 1990 I was not dis­ap­point­ed. If you see every­thing as a chal­lenge you would be­come a com­plainant in life.

What was your low­est mo­ment in pol­i­tics?

When I was re­moved as Ch­agua­nas May­or in which Jack Warn­er and Gan­ga Singh had ma­jor roles to play. Be­lieve it or not, that last­ed two or three days and I was over that. I moved on. I went back to my con­sul­tan­cy and singing of Ra­mayan.

Were you part of a ca­bal in the Peo­ple's Part­ner­ship Gov­ern­ment?

Every prime min­is­ter, every po­lit­i­cal leader will have a group of ad­vis­ers, and Kam­la had a group of ad­vis­ers. But this wasn't a ca­bal. She would have her close ad­vis­ers. I would tell you some­thing, she had an ex­pand­ed group al­so. Kam­la is one per­son who I have worked with who would sit at a ta­ble and ask every­body their opin­ion be­fore she came to a con­clu­sion or de­ci­sion and you may not have agreed with it. Some­times it led her to pro­cras­ti­nate. In the process of pro­cras­ti­na­tion, I think the speed at which the de­ci­sion should have been made may not have been made. I have had dif­fer­ences in her ap­proach­es and strate­gies.

You men­tioned that the UNC needs to be re­vamped, do you think this should have been done be­fore the 2015 gen­er­al elec­tion?

The UNC start­ed to re­brand the mo­ment it lost the elec­tions. Re­brand­ing is a con­tin­u­ous process be­cause it is a re­sponse to change.

With re­brand­ing, do you think the UNC could win the 2020 gen­er­al elec­tion?

We are fast ap­proach­ing the case where we must have some kind of uni­ty in the coun­try. It has to be uni­ty that will be sus­tain­able. I per­son­al­ly don't be­lieve that mem­bers of trade unions nec­es­sar­i­ly vote in block. I think the UNC can win in the next elec­tion. I think Per­sad-Bisses­sar has the ca­pa­bil­i­ty to bring this great el­e­ment to­geth­er.

What was the UNC's biggest mis­take lead­ing up to the 2015 gen­er­al elec­tion?

I think we al­lowed the pop­u­la­tion to be­lieve lies. A lot of things were said about the UNC that was not true. The nar­ra­tive that was cre­at­ed by the PNM and to some ex­tent the labour move­ment about the UNC gained tremen­dous ground and took over from the per­for­mance of the par­ty. There is no doubt in my mind we were a per­form­ing par­ty. The PNM is in­ter­est­ed in win­ning elec­tions but they are poor in gov­er­nance. You can say the op­po­site for the UNC. We are very good at gov­er­nance, but we al­so need to know how to win elec­tions and to stay in pow­er.

What was the Peo­ple's Part­ner­ship ma­jor faux pas dur­ing their tenure?

I think we suf­fered at times from the num­ber of peo­ple who had to be re­moved from gov­ern­ment. That was some­thing that caused us some harm. I think we al­so need­ed to sell our­selves a lit­tle more to the pop­u­la­tion. What is in­ter­est­ing, peo­ple are be­gin­ning to see and com­pare our per­for­mance.

Do you think Per­sad-Bisses­sar is the best per­son to lead the UNC?

I be­lieve she has the ex­pe­ri­ence as a prime min­is­ter. Sec­ond­ly, she is an in­tel­li­gent per­son who I be­lieve in my heart has learnt from her ex­pe­ri­ences. I don't think she will make the same mis­takes. I think she is much tougher than she was in 2010 to 2015. This is why she has the courage to re­vamp the UNC even if that means that peo­ple are go­ing to get hurt in the process or some peo­ple are not go­ing to get their seats. I think she still has cur­ren­cy in terms of be­ing a leader. Peo­ple might ar­gue that she lost a num­ber of elec­tions and that is al­so true. I think peo­ple are be­gin­ning to com­pare two lead­ers at this mo­ment.

Do you think the old­er heads in the par­ty should step aside and make room for new blood?

I don't want to speak for them. I can on­ly speak for my­self. I re­al­ly want­ed to give Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar the space to cre­ate the change. I want­ed to set the ex­am­ple. I think I have done that. I think, though, that I have awak­en a cer­tain con­scious­ness in the par­ty and peo­ple. You must have a mix of ex­pe­ri­ence and fresh ideas.

Do you think the PNM will come af­ter you for the Point Fortin to San Fer­nan­do High­way, see­ing that they have asked for a com­mis­sion of en­quiry in­to the project?

Why you say come af­ter me? Every­thing is there in pa­per. Every­thing is there at Nid­co and so on. I have no prob­lems with them in­ves­ti­gat­ing the high­way or any­thing like that. They spoke about the val­u­a­tions, Nid­co was in charge of the val­u­a­tions. They were done by pri­vate treaty, a sys­tem that start­ed un­der the PNM. Those ac­qui­si­tions of prop­er­ties start­ed way be­fore we took over the process of gov­ern­ment. You don't be­gin to ac­quire prop­er­ties when you start to build a high­way. You be­gin to ac­quire prop­er­ties way back.

So are you singing the mantra of Per­sad-Bisses­sar that your hands are clean and heart is pure in the high­way project?

Yes, I did what I had to do. I know it was done above board.

 


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored