JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 25, 2025

Terms of reference for Commission of Enquiry

by

News Desk
2205 days ago
20190711
A Commission of Enquiry will examine the land acquisition involved in the construction of the San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway.

A Commission of Enquiry will examine the land acquisition involved in the construction of the San Fernando to Point Fortin Highway.

The Cab­i­net has tak­en a de­ci­sion to launch a com­mis­sion of en­quiry in­to land ac­qui­si­tion for the con­struc­tion of the Point Fortin High­way.

The fol­low­ing are the terms of ref­er­ence for the com­mis­sion:

I. To en­quire in­to-

(i) the ac­tions of and on be­half of the State in ac­quir­ing and tak­ing steps to ac­quire prop­er­ties and struc­tures in re­spect of the con­struc­tion of the ex­ten­sion of the Solomon Ho­choy High­way Ex­ten­sion to Point Fortin (here­inafter re­ferred to as “the SHHEPF Project”).

(ii) Whether the Cab­i­net ap­point­ed Min­is­te­r­i­al Over­sight Com­mit­tee which com­prised:-

1. Hon. Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar – Prime Min­is­ter (Chair­man);

2. Hon. Stephen Cadiz – Min­is­ter of Trade and In­dus­try;

3. Hon.Win­ston Dook­er­an- Min­is­ter of Fi­nance;

4. Hon. Dr. Roodal Mooni­lal – Min­is­ter of Hous­ing and En­vi­ron­ment;

5. Hon. Chan­dresh Shar­ma- Min­is­ter of Lo­cal Gov­ern­ment;

6. Hon. Jack Warn­er- Min­is­ter of Works and Trans­port;

7. Sen­a­tor the Hon. Em­manuel George- Min­is­ter of Pub­lic Util­i­ties;

8. Sen­a­tor the Hon. Kevin Ram­nar­ine- Min­is­ter En­er­gy and En­er­gy Af­fairs;

9. Sen­a­tor the Hon. Dr. Bhoen­dra­datt Tewarie – Min­is­ter of Plan­ning and Econ­o­my; and

10. Hon. Sta­cy Roop­nar­ine- Min­is­ter of State in the Min­istry if Works and In­fra­struc­ture,

ful­filled its man­date –

a) To act as a pol­i­cy guid­ance mech­a­nism for the im­ple­men­ta­tion of the SHHEPF project pro­vid­ing ad­vice, as re­quired, to the Cab­i­net on key ar­eas of de­ci­sion mak­ing and re­view as the SHHEPF Project pro­gressed.

b) To act as a mech­a­nism to en­sure that all ap­provals were ef­fi­cient­ly ob­tained to al­low for ad­her­ence to the SHHEPF Project time­lines and qual­i­ty stan­dards.

c) To over­see the im­ple­men­ta­tion of the SHHEPF Project as it re­lat­ed to fund­ing, qual­i­ty met­rics and time.

d) To spear­head:-

1. the pub­lic out­reach as­pect of the SHHEPF Project to en­sure that the gen­er­al pub­lic is kept in­formed as to the im­pli­ca­tions, im­pacts and ben­e­fits of the project to the coun­try as a whole.

2. the Com­mu­ni­ty Out­reach pro­gramme and the man­age­ment of im­pacts to the af­fect­ed stake­hold­ers.

e) To en­sure:-

1. that the prop­er mon­i­tor­ing and eval­u­a­tion was un­der­tak­en and that the coun­try re­ceived val­ue for mon­ey out­put.

2. the lo­cal con­struc­tion in­dus­try ben­e­fit­ted from the im­ple­men­ta­tion of the SHHEPF Project and that there was a trans­fer of knowl­edge to the ex­tent pos­si­ble in the im­ple­men­ta­tion of the project.

f) To es­tab­lish guide­lines for the re­lo­ca­tion and com­pen­sa­tion of af­fect­ed per­sons.

(iii) The de­ci­sion of the Na­tion­al In­fra­struc­ture De­vel­op­ment Com­pa­ny Lim­it­ed (here­inafter re­ferred to as “NID­CO”) to re­duce the right of way for the SHHEPF Project and to con­sid­er whether and what ac­count was tak­en of the po­ten­tial le­gal and fi­nan­cial im­pli­ca­tions to the State and prop­er­ty own­ers who were served with Sec­tion 3 No­tices and Sec­tion 4 Or­ders un­der the Land Ac­qui­si­tion Act Chap­ter 58:01.

(iv) The cir­cum­stances which re­sult­ed in the State ei­ther ac­quir­ing or hav­ing tak­en steps to ac­quire prop­er­ties that are no longer re­quired for the con­struc­tion of the SHHEPF Project.

(v) The com­pen­sa­tion or non-com­pen­sa­tion of per­sons who were served land ac­qui­si­tion No­tices and Or­ders and/or who in­curred ex­pens­es in sub­mit­ting claims for com­pen­sa­tion and/or whose prop­er­ties are no longer re­quired for the con­struc­tion of the SHHEPF Project.

(vi) The process­es which were utilised by the State and/or NID­CO for ap­prov­ing the pay­ment of com­pen­sa­tion to per­sons af­fect­ed by the­land ac­qui­si­tion process for the SHHEPF Project.

(vii) The process utilised by NID­CO and the Of­fice of the Com­mis­sion­er of State Lands (here­inafter re­ferred to as “the COSL”) for the al­lo­ca­tion of lands to per­sons af­fect­ed by the land ac­qui­si­tion process for the SHHEPF Project in­clud­ing:

a) Those sit­u­at­ed at Pe­tit Morne and Gol­con­da to per­sons with good ti­tle;

b) Those sit­u­at­ed at Cedar Hill, Phase II to Squat­ters; and

c) Farm­ers.

(vi­ii) The process utilised by the State and/or NID­CO and /or the Trinidad and To­ba­go Hous­ing De­vel­op­ment Cor­po­ra­tion for the re­lo­ca­tion of per­sons in­clud­ing el­der­ly/sick per­sons who were af­fect­ed by the land ac­qui­si­tion process for the SHHEPF Project.

(ix) Whether per­sons who were al­lo­cat­ed State lands and/or hous­ing units from the Trinidad and To­ba­go Hous­ing De­vel­op­ment Cor­po­ra­tion aris­ing out of the land ac­qui­si­tion for the SHHEPF Project were el­i­gi­ble to re­ceive same in ac­cor­dance with the Cab­i­net ap­proved com­pen­sa­tion pol­i­cy.

(x) Whether NID­CO and the COSL ex­er­cised due dili­gence in the al­lo­ca­tion of State lands and/or hous­ing units from the Trinidad and To­ba­go Hous­ing De­vel­op­ment Cor­po­ra­tion.

(xi) Whether and what pay­ments were made by per­sons in con­sid­er­a­tion of their be­ing al­lo­cat­ed State lands and/or hous­ing units from the Trinidad and To­ba­go Hous­ing De­vel­op­ment Cor­po­ra­tion un­der the Cab­i­net ap­proved com­pen­sa­tion pol­i­cy.

(xii) The val­u­a­tion method­ol­o­gy utilised by NID­CO and COSL for the as­sess­ment and pay­ment of com­pen­sa­tion for the lands which were to be ac­quired by the State for the con­struc­tion of the SHHEPF Project and the steps tak­en to en­sure the in­tegri­ty of the val­u­a­tion process.

(xi­ii) Whether there were any con­flicts of in­ter­est or oth­er el­e­ments of im­pro­pri­ety on the part of the of­fi­cials of the Val­u­a­tion Di­vi­sion in the Min­istry of Fi­nance in­volved in the as­sess­ment of com­pen­sa­tion for any of the prop­er­ties which were sub­ject to the land ac­qui­si­tion process for the SHHEPF Project and if so, the cir­cum­stances giv­ing rise to same and the man­ner in which they were han­dled and/or ad­dressed.

(xiv) The cir­cum­stances lead­ing to le­gal claims be­ing filed against the State and NID­CO aris­ing out of the land ac­qui­si­tion process for the SHHEPF Project.

(xv) Whether there was an ap­pro­pri­ate com­pen­sa­tion pol­i­cy in place on March 4th, 2011 when NID­CO en­gaged the De­sign- Build Con­trac­tor, Con­stru­to­ra OAS Ltd (here­inafter re­ferred to as “OAS”) to com­plete de­sign and con­struc­tion works on the SHHEPF Project.

(xvi) The facts and cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing the com­pen­sa­tion pol­i­cy which was in fact adopt­ed by the State for the ac­qui­si­tion of land for the con­struc­tion of the SHHEPF Project.

(xvii) Whether the Gov­ern­ment’s land ac­qui­si­tion com­pen­sa­tion pol­i­cy that was utilised for the ac­qui­si­tion of lands in re­spect of the con­struc­tion of the SHHEPF Project was un­der­tak­en with ap­pro­pri­ate due dili­gence and over­sight and in a man­ner suf­fi­cient to en­sure val­ue for mon­ey and the ab­sence of im­pro­pri­ety.

(xvi­ii) The facts and cir­cum­stances sur­round­ing the hir­ing by NID­CO of pri­vate at­tor­neys/ne­go­ti­at­ing con­sul­tants and val­uers by NID­CO to as­sist in its man­age­ment of its Land Ac­qui­si­tion Port­fo­lio for the ac­qui­si­tion of lands by the State for the SHHEPF Project.

(xix) Whether the Board of NID­CO and/or the ex­ec­u­tive man­age­ment of NID­CO ful­filled and com­plied with the re­spon­si­bil­i­ties and du­ties im­posed up­on them by law and by good cor­po­rate gov­er­nance and prac­tice in man­ag­ing the Land Ac­qui­si­tion port­fo­lio for the ac­qui­si­tion of lands by the State for the con­struc­tion of the SHHEPF Project.

(xx) The iden­ti­ties of the of­fi­cials, if any, who have failed in their du­ties or such oth­er per­sons whose con­duct may have been against the best in­ter­ests of the State in the land ac­qui­si­tion process for the SHHEPF Project.

II. To make such find­ings, ob­ser­va­tions and rec­om­men­da­tions aris­ing out of its de­lib­er­a­tions, as may be deemed ap­pro­pri­ate, in re­la­tion to –

(i) Whether there has been a breach of du­ty by any per­sons or en­ti­ties;

(ii) Whether there are any grounds for any crim­i­nal and civ­il pro­ceed­ings to be ini­ti­at­ed against any per­sons or en­ti­ties;

(iii) Whether crim­i­nal pro­ceed­ings should be rec­om­mend­ed to the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic Pros­e­cu­tions for his con­sid­er­a­tion;

(iv) Whether civ­il pro­ceed­ings should be rec­om­mend­ed to the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al for his con­sid­er­a­tion;

(v) The ap­pro­pri­ate best prac­tice to be utilised by the State for the ac­qui­si­tion of land re­quired for pub­lic pur­pos­es; and

(vi) Any oth­er rec­om­men­da­tions that may be deemed nec­es­sary in the cir­cum­stances.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored