Senior Reporter
kevon.felmine@guardian.co.tt
Urban Development Corporation (Udecott) chairman Noel Garcia says construction of the Port-of-Spain General Hospital’s Central Block remains within its $1.2 billion budget and is on course for commissioning in March 2025.
Garcia responded to a request for an update from Public Accounts (Enterprises) Committee chairman Wade Mark at yesterday’s meeting to enquire into Udecott’s audited accounts, balance sheets and other financial statements for 2017-2018.
While Shanghai Construction originally got the contract, Garcia said COVID-19 caused several issues, leading to a mutual termination.
Udecott approached Cabinet and agreed to break the project into packages to allow local contractors to participate. It awarded contracts to local firms Universal Structures Ltd and Beston Consulting Ltd.
China Railway Construction Caribbean Company Ltd will undertake structural outfitting.
Garcia said delivery in March of 2025 would include the physical building, outfitting, staff training, testing and commissioning.
Udecott held the topping-off ceremony last month, marking the completion of the building core. Garcia said Universal experienced minor challenges because of the “extremely complex” construction.
Garcia said that Udecott had a quest to develop the construction sector, so it provided the firm with the opportunity to undertake the project.
He said Universal overcame challenges and completed the core. Phase two is underway, and Garcia said there is hope for completion in September 2024.
Tendering for medical equipment, ICT and furniture was complete, he said and Udecott was drafting a note to Cabinet for the award of a contract.
He said all the proponents for equipment supply and furniture were local companies. However, the ICT pr ovider is a foreign company.
“The project is on stream to be completed, commissioned and put into use by March 2025, with completed construction works by September 2024,” Garcia said.
Udecott proud of work on Red House
Mark also questioned Udecott’s Red House restoration, saying while it was a completed project, Parliament staff had to find buckets to capture water during rainfall due to a leaking roof. He asked Garcia if he felt contractors provided value for money on the $441 million project.
Garcia said Udecott was “extremely” proud of its work on Parliament and considers it a significant achievement. He said the board has done what no other could in the past 17 years.
Regarding the leaks, he was satisfied that the company had resolved the issue, adding there was a team monitoring leaks. He said some leaks were not from the roof, as there was a condensation issue in the north chamber. He said Udecott corrected the defective ducting.
“We are confident that we have overcome the leak problem, but it is an old building that was refurbished, and problems will arise from time to time. You know that in our house, you have to change the bulbs. You have to correct the plumbing because a house, like a building at times, could be equated to a living organism,” he said.
Garcia said the restoration was a significant achievement done by nationals and over 24 small and medium-sized contractors within budget and time.
But Mark questioned what percentage of foreigners were involved, recalling that he saw many Venezuelans working on the project. Garcia said all 24 companies were T&T registered and the owners were nationals.
“We, as a policy in Udecott, do not get involved in the contractual arrangement of our contractors because it has certain legal implications for us.
As far as I am aware, all of the companies that did the work on the Red House are locally registered companies, owned and managed by locals who are, as far as I am aware, nationals of T&T. If they employed Venezuelans, I do not know.”
Mark requested a list of the contractors involved. Garcia said Udecott published it as an advertisement in the newspaper but would submit it to the committee.
