JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, July 9, 2025

UNC calls on President to come clean on PSC imbroglio

by

1360 days ago
20211017
Senator Jayanti Lutchmedial addresses several issues surrounding the collapse of the Police Service Commission, President, Prime Minister and Attorney General during a press conference yesterday at the Leader of the Opposition office, Charles Street, Port-of-Spain.

Senator Jayanti Lutchmedial addresses several issues surrounding the collapse of the Police Service Commission, President, Prime Minister and Attorney General during a press conference yesterday at the Leader of the Opposition office, Charles Street, Port-of-Spain.

The Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC) has chal­lenged Pres­i­dent Paula-Mae Weekes to come clean about the role her of­fice played in the cur­rent im­broglio in­volv­ing Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley, the Po­lice Ser­vice Com­mis­sion (PSC) and for­mer po­lice com­mis­sion­er Gary Grif­fith.

Speak­ing dur­ing UNC’s week­ly vir­tu­al me­dia brief­ing yes­ter­day, Sen­a­tor Jayan­ti Lutch­me­di­al said, “The Pres­i­dent, now more than ever, must ac­count to the peo­ple. Si­lence is sim­ply not an op­tion.”

Call­ing for clar­i­ty in light of Row­ley’s ad­mis­sion on Sat­ur­day that he had been com­mu­ni­cat­ing with the com­mis­sion dur­ing the past year, dur­ing which time he ex­pressed a vote of no con­fi­dence in Grif­fith as com­mis­sion­er– Lutch­me­di­al said for Weekes to re­main silent on such crit­i­cal is­sues, it could be in­ter­pret­ed that, “The Pres­i­dent is bring­ing the of­fice she holds in­to dis­re­pute by ap­pear­ing to be par­ti­san.”

In­di­cat­ing the UNC was not lev­el­ing such an al­le­ga­tion, Lutch­me­di­al said in law, jus­tice must not on­ly be done but must be seen to be done.

She added, “You must not on­ly be non-par­ti­san but you must ap­pear that way to the pub­lic. The pub­lic must have that con­fi­dence that the Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter sits above the pol­i­tics and has no fear or favour in how they ex­er­cise their func­tions and du­ties.”

Claim­ing sim­i­lar calls for ac­count­abil­i­ty had em­anat­ed from oth­er quar­ters and could not be ig­nored, Lutch­me­di­al said, “The pub­lic has lost con­fi­dence in the PSC, in their in­de­pen­dence.”

De­scrib­ing as trou­bling that for the first time in T&T’s his­to­ry that it was with­out a po­lice com­mis­sion­er or an act­ing po­lice com­mis­sion­er, and there was no com­mis­sion to ap­point a com­mis­sion­er­—she went on, “The au­thors of this de­ba­cle must be held to ac­count.”

Not­ing the pub­lished state­ment in the dai­ly news­pa­per by the Pres­i­dent yes­ter­day, Lutch­me­di­al said the coun­try has many unan­swered ques­tions.

Adding that the UNC would not al­low the rant­i­ngs of a mad man to stop them from ful­fill­ing its man­date to de­liv­er the coun­try from the dic­ta­to­r­i­al clutch­es of Row­ley, she said, “Our coun­try is falling apart, lit­er­al­ly. Roads and bridges are falling apart but our in­sti­tu­tions are al­so crum­bling.”

As a for­mer crim­i­nal at­tor­ney, Lutch­me­di­al said Row­ley, along with oth­ers had now been caught out in their lies and had no oth­er op­tion but to, “rant and rave and cre­ate as many dis­trac­tions, di­ver­sions and ex­cus­es as pos­si­ble, be­cause they can no longer de­ny the role they played in a very dis­turb­ing saga.”

Out­lin­ing the chronol­o­gy of events, Lutch­me­di­al said in 2020 —the then CoP Grif­fith, “had stood up to the PM and right­ly so I be­lieve, to tell him that his in­ter­pre­ta­tion of po­lice pow­ers un­der the Pub­lic Health Reg­u­la­tions was wrong, that the TTPS could not en­tre pri­vate prop­er­ty and so on.”

She added, “You would re­call that Mr Grif­fith was sum­moned to a meet­ing short­ly there­after, and he then apol­o­gised. Now in­ter­est­ing­ly, the Gov­ern­ment end­ed up hav­ing to de­clare a State of Emer­gency for the same rea­son that com­mis­sion­er Grif­fith high­light­ed, so that alone tells you he was right.”

“I shud­der to think that as a PM some­one would be so pet­ty, but it would ap­pear that if Row­ley says jump and you don’t ask “how high” that he will lose con­fi­dence in you. Per­haps Row­ley lost con­fi­dence in his abil­i­ty to con­trol the CoP. Per­haps he re­alised then that he could not get the CoP to fol­low his com­mands and this did not sit well with him, so he em­barked on what would ap­pear to be a cam­paign against the CoP and so he start­ed in­ter­fac­ing with the PolSC.”

Lutch­me­di­al said Row­ley, “as­ton­ish­ing­ly says that there is an el­e­ment of in­ter­ac­tion built in­to the in­de­pen­dence of our in­sti­tu­tions. This is how he jus­ti­fies an at­tempt to in­flu­ence the PolSC in the ex­er­cise of their func­tions un­der the con­sti­tu­tion. He fur­ther states that he does not have to pass through the pres­i­dent to get the Com­mis­sion to do any­thing. He can do it him­self. He is so bold­faced, that he is boast­ing that he can and will and al­ready has utilised his of­fice to feed in­for­ma­tion to what ought to be in­de­pen­dent in­sti­tu­tions.”

De­clar­ing this to be “hog­wash,” she added, “This is how you are jus­ti­fy­ing an at­tempt to in­flu­ence the PolSC in the ex­er­cise of their func­tions un­der the Con­sti­tu­tion.”

She al­so ques­tioned if the PSC had ever been in­formed of the fact-find­ing mis­sion that Row­ley’s two hand-picked re­tirees had been sent on, and if the con­tents of that ex­er­cise had been shared with the en­tire com­mis­sion or on­ly with for­mer chair­man of the com­mis­sion Bliss Seep­er­sad.

Claim­ing Seep­er­sad had been a po­lit­i­cal ap­pointee who had been serv­ing on an­oth­er State board when she was se­lect­ed to head the in­de­pen­dent PSC, Lutch­me­di­al re­mind­ed the na­tion that the UNC had voiced ob­jec­tions when Seep­er­sad’s rec­om­men­da­tion was ini­tial­ly brought up.

“The coun­try is now wit­ness­ing the af­ter­math of that very poor de­ci­sion,” she said.

“This sto­ry which the PM has so help­ful­ly ex­posed for him­self, jus­ti­fies all of the con­cerns raised by the Op­po­si­tion in the past few weeks. There was clear­ly a con­cert­ed ef­fort on the part of politi­cians to in­flu­ence the de­ci­sions of the ser­vice com­mis­sion.”

In re­in­forc­ing the call for Weekes to speak out, Lutch­me­di­al ar­gued, “The Pres­i­dent ap­point­ed the PSC. If the PSC had in­for­ma­tion passed to them or to the chair­man by a politi­cian who was com­plain­ing about the CoP, the Pres­i­dent had a du­ty to ad­vise them about the prop­er man­ner to pro­ceed.”

Re­gard­ing Seep­er­sad, she said, “Bliss Seep­er­sad can­not and will not be al­lowed to sim­ply slip out of this melee with­out be­ing held ac­count­able for her very ques­tion­able con­duct.”

“The PolSC chair­man must say whether she shared her in­for­ma­tion from Row­ley with the oth­er mem­bers—Roger Kawals­ingh’s let­ter to the Pres­i­dent sug­gest­ed that they were left in the dark.”

Seep­er­sad, ac­cord­ing to Kawals­ingh went to re­tired Jus­tice Stan­ley John and spoke with him with­out their knowl­edge.

In­di­cat­ing that Seep­er­sad had al­so made a uni­lat­er­al de­ci­sion to sus­pend Grif­fith from the act­ing ap­point­ment, with­out con­sul­ta­tion, Lutch­me­di­al said, “It rais­es very se­ri­ous ques­tions about who was ad­vis­ing or in­struct­ing her.”

In a full-page ad­ver­tise­ment yes­ter­day, Weekes as­sured, “I as­sure the na­tion that nei­ther the OTP nor I par­tic­i­pat­ed in, al­lowed, or en­cour­aged any at­tempt­ed or ac­tu­al im­prop­er in­ter­fer­ence, in­flu­ence or breach of the prin­ci­ple of sep­a­ra­tion of pow­ers in the op­er­a­tion of the PolSC in the mat­ter of the Com­mis­sion­er of Po­lice. I did not re­ceive in­struc­tions or sug­ges­tions from any in­di­vid­ual, nor did I give any to the PolSC. I cer­tain­ly did not wil­ful­ly vi­o­late any pro­vi­sion of the Con­sti­tu­tion nor have I be­haved in a way that could lead one rea­son­ably to con­clude that I have brought the OTP in­to ha­tred, ridicule or con­tempt or en­dan­gered the se­cu­ri­ty of the State.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored