JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, June 23, 2025

UNC Govt violated citizens’ privacy

by

Renuka Singh
2050 days ago
20191113

While of­fi­cials of the Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC) con­tin­ue to de­ny their role in the Cam­bridge An­a­lyt­i­ca scan­dal, a new book by an ex-work­er of the com­pa­ny de­tails the work they did in Trinidad and To­ba­go in 2013 and paints a dark pic­ture of the da­ta col­lect­ed and used by the then Peo­ple’s Part­ner­ship gov­ern­ment.

More fright­en­ing is the claim in the book, writ­ten by for­mer com­pa­ny da­ta con­sul­tant Christo­pher Wylie, that the then gov­ern­ment al­lowed them to use da­ta min­ing to “spy” on vot­er be­hav­iour to track T&T cit­i­zens’ pat­terns and be­hav­iour.

“We were spy­ing, pure and sim­ple, with cov­er from the Trinida­di­an lead­ers,” Wylie claims in his new book Mindf**k.

He said while na­tion­al se­cu­ri­ty of­fi­cials were in­ter­est­ed in the mined da­ta to help with the ram­pant crime lev­els and to iden­ti­fy per­sons more like­ly to com­mit crimes, “the Trinida­di­an gov­ern­ment wasn’t in­ter­est­ed on­ly in re­duc­ing crime.”

“They knew that if we built a tool to fore­cast be­hav­iour, they could use it in elec­tions. They weren’t just fo­cused on fu­ture crim­i­nals, they al­so want­ed to ze­ro in on fu­ture po­lit­i­cal sup­port­ers,” Wylie wrote.

An­oth­er alarm­ing al­le­ga­tion by Wylie was that the then gov­ern­ment did not seek to pro­tect the da­ta of the cit­i­zens, but in­stead gave Cam­bridge An­a­lyt­i­ca un­fet­tered ac­cess to unredact­ed da­ta on every­one.

“Es­sen­tial­ly, the Trinida­di­an gov­ern­ment was vi­o­lat­ing the pri­va­cy of all its cit­i­zens in one swoop,” he said.

“The raw cen­sus da­ta would ob­vi­ous­ly be use­ful for the project but it wasn’t a re­source we could ex­pect to have avail­able to us in de­vel­oped coun­tries. Pri­va­cy is a con­cern usu­al­ly re­served for the rich.”

Wylie said the com­pa­ny was able to tap in­to the main telecom­mu­ni­ca­tions in­fra­struc­ture, pick an IP (In­ter­net pro­to­col) ad­dress and sit and watch what that per­son was do­ing on the in­ter­net. Their mon­i­tor­ing turned up in­ter­est­ing types of be­hav­iour from T&T cit­i­zens, Wylie ad­mit­ted. He de­tailed one in­stance of hon­ing in on a sin­gle In­ter­net user who was tog­gling be­tween plan­tain recipes and porn.

“Not sur­pris­ing­ly, it was a lot of porn. Peo­ple were brows­ing every­thing imag­in­able, in­clud­ing the cul­tur­al­ly spe­cif­ic ‘Tri­ni Porn,’” he said.

The com­pa­ny’s soft­ware and un­lim­it­ed ac­cess to lo­cal in­ter­net pro­to­cols al­lowed Cam­bridge An­a­lyt­i­ca to zoom in to the in­ter­net users’ ad­dress­es and even use Google Earth to pin­point the users’ homes, he said. How­ev­er, Wylie ad­mit­ted to a “bizarre” feel­ing of ob­serv­ing what peo­ple were watch­ing on a “tiny, far­away is­land.”

Ac­cord­ing to Wylie, the T&T con­tract in­clud­ed “build­ing in­fra­struc­ture for Face­book da­ta har­vest­ing, click-stream da­ta, ISP (in­ter­net ser­vice provider) logs and the rec­on­cil­i­a­tion of IP ad­dress­es and user agents to home ad­dress­es,” which ef­fec­tive­ly re­moved the ca­su­al anonymi­ty of in­ter­net use.

The UNC, the ma­jor­i­ty par­ty of the then amal­ga­mat­ed Peo­ple’s Part­ner­ship that formed the gov­ern­ment at the time, ve­he­ment­ly de­nied any con­nec­tion to the scan­dal that rocked the coun­try in 2018 af­ter Cam­bridge An­a­lyt­i­ca’s prac­tices were ex­posed in­ter­na­tion­al­ly.

Guardian Me­dia reached out yes­ter­day to UNC MP Rod­ney Charles, who was then the par­ty’s cam­paign man­ag­er, for com­ment on the mat­ter. He said he had not yet seen the book and af­ter some of the para­graphs of the book were read to him, said he had no clue about what was di­vulged by Wylie.

How­ev­er, Charles said it was time for Wylie to pro­vide more specifics about his claims like names, emails and con­tracts. He said if Wylie can’t do so, it is noth­ing short of a glo­ri­fied “Nan­cy sto­ry”.

Charles point­ed out that this was not a case of some­thing hap­pen­ing a month ago but years ago. This, he said, is why Wylie should be spe­cif­ic in his claims.

“I have no clue about what you are talk­ing about. I am too prin­ci­pled to be in some­thing like that. He needs to pro­vide hard da­ta, call names, pro­vide emails. If he can’t do that then this is a fairy tale sto­ry,” Charles main­tained. (See Page A6)


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored