JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

UNC to file motion of privileges against Hinds

by

1156 days ago
20220526

The Op­po­si­tion Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress (UNC) has filed a mo­tion of priv­i­leges against Mem­ber of Par­lia­ment for Laven­tille West, Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter Fitzger­ald Hinds, for what they deem to be “de­grad­ing com­ments to­ward MP for Ch­agua­nas East Van­dana Mo­hit.”

The mo­tion arose fol­low­ing re­marks Hinds made in the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives on May 23, where he re­ferred to the views of UNC mem­bers Khadi­jah Ameen, Anil Roberts and “the Mem­ber for Ch­agua­nas East” as “naked, un­true and skimpy.”

It al­so stems from com­ments Hinds al­leged­ly made to Mo­hit out­side of the Cham­ber.

The mo­tion, filed by Pointe-a-Pierre MP and Op­po­si­tion Chief Whip David Lee, claims Hinds “breached one of the fun­da­men­tal Priv­i­leges of Par­lia­ment which all Mem­bers are en­ti­tled to in the free­dom from ob­struc­tion, in­ter­fer­ence, in­tim­i­da­tion and mo­lesta­tion.”

The UNC claimed in a news re­lease yes­ter­day that Hinds’ state­ment was “un­par­lia­men­tary, vile and vul­gar” and con­tra­vened the im­mu­ni­ties that are af­ford­ed to all MPs.

“At a time when girls and women are vic­tims of un­prece­dent­ed lev­els of vi­o­lent as­sault, the vile lan­guage and be­hav­iour dis­played by Min­is­ter Hinds would have giv­en no re­as­sur­ance that he is ca­pa­ble of treat­ing gen­der-based vi­o­lence with the se­ri­ous­ness it de­serves. Most wor­ry­ing­ly, Min­is­ter Hinds clear­ly dis­plays the same misog­y­nis­tic view of women as those who com­mit phys­i­cal and sex­u­al as­sault,” the par­ty’s state­ment said.

In the mo­tion, which will be brought be­fore the House to­day and which was cir­cu­lat­ed to the me­dia yes­ter­day, Lee will ar­gue that de­spite the rul­ing of the Speak­er that Hinds should be “care­ful with com­ments that are un­par­lia­men­tary,” Hinds “per­sist­ed with the vul­gar, deroga­to­ry, un­par­lia­men­tary and in­tim­i­dat­ing state­ments of same against the Mem­ber for Ch­agua­nas East dur­ing the sus­pen­sion of the sit­ting with­in the Par­lia­men­tary cham­ber where there was no pro­tec­tion of the Stand­ing Or­ders nor the Ho­n­ourable Chair to be sought.”

The mo­tion will state, “It is clear that the un­par­lia­men­tary, vul­gar and of­fen­sive in­sin­u­a­tions un­fair­ly made by the Mem­ber for Laven­tille West against the Mem­ber for Ch­agua­nas East is a clear act of mo­lesta­tion and act to in­tim­i­date as such ac­tions con­tin­ued with­in the Cham­ber dur­ing the sus­pen­sion of the sit­ting af­ter the Mem­ber’s con­tri­bu­tion end­ed. Such ac­tions breached the Priv­i­leges of this House and the Im­mu­ni­ties of­fered to all Mem­bers which are ex­pect­ed to be pre­served, pro­tect­ed as well as up­held at all times.”

Lee will tell the House that “the un­der­tak­ing of such ac­tions by Hinds while the sit­ting was sus­pend­ed but with­in the precincts of the Par­lia­ment still equate to con­tempt as equal­ly as if it was done in a sit­ting.”

The mo­tion will al­so claim that “this form of abuse and dis­re­gard for the priv­i­leges of the House is not an iso­lat­ed in­ci­dent but rather part of a per­sis­tent in­tent of men­ac­ing be­hav­iour by the Mem­ber of Laven­tille West to­wards the Mem­ber of Ch­agua­nas East which must not be al­lowed to go fur­ther.”

CLICK FOR MORE NEWS


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored