JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, August 18, 2025

UWI students freed of 2018 protest charges

by

Derek Achong
1865 days ago
20200709
FLASHBACK: UWI students Nathanael John, left and Brian Richards outside the Tunapuna Magistrates’ Court before the start of their matter in November 2018.

FLASHBACK: UWI students Nathanael John, left and Brian Richards outside the Tunapuna Magistrates’ Court before the start of their matter in November 2018.

ANISTO ALVES

Two Uni­ver­si­ty of the West In­dies (UWI) stu­dents have been freed of charges aris­ing out of a protest over se­cu­ri­ty at the in­sti­tu­tion’s St Au­gus­tine cam­pus in 2018. 

Nathanael John and Bri­an Richards were freed of charges for re­sist­ing ar­rest and ob­struct­ing po­lice of­fi­cers in the ex­e­cu­tion of their du­ties dur­ing a vir­tu­al hear­ing of their case be­fore Mag­is­trate Sherene Mur­ray-Bai­ley yes­ter­day. 

Guardian Me­dia un­der­stands that when the case was called the pros­e­cut­ing State at­tor­ney in­di­cat­ed that the Of­fice of the Di­rec­tor of Pub­lic (DPP) would dis­con­tin­ue the charges against Richards but not John. 

John’s le­gal team re­quest­ed that the tri­al be­gin dur­ing the vir­tu­al hear­ing un­der the prac­tice di­rec­tions is­sued by Chief Jus­tice Ivor Archie for court hear­ings dur­ing the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic. 

How­ev­er, the pros­e­cu­tors asked for it to be ad­journed so the tri­al could take place in a court­room at the Tu­na­puna Mag­is­trate’s Court. 

Af­ter Mur­ray-Bai­ley up­held John’s sub­mis­sions and start­ed the case, the DPP’s Of­fice did not lead the ev­i­dence of any its wit­ness­es. 

At­tor­ney Kei­th Scot­land, who was part of John’s le­gal team, then pre­sent­ed a no-case sub­mis­sion in which he point­ed out there was in­suf­fi­cient ev­i­dence to war­rant the charge. Scot­land’s sub­mis­sion was up­held and the charges were dis­missed. 

Con­tact­ed yes­ter­day, John said he was pleased by the out­come but com­plained over how the case was pros­e­cut­ed. 

“It has been an emo­tion­al­ly and men­tal­ly drain­ing two years...I don’t think jus­tice was served,” John said, as he not­ed the case was de­layed sev­er­al times af­ter po­lice of­fi­cers failed to at­tend hear­ings. 

Say­ing he and his co-ac­cused made 10 court ap­pear­ances be­fore the out­come, John said: “Many times I had to post­pone dif­fer­ent events I had to do and even class­es. It was frus­trat­ing.” 

Ac­cord­ing to re­ports, the duo was ar­rest­ed in Oc­to­ber 2018 while par­tic­i­pat­ing in a protest at the south­ern en­trance to UWI’s cam­pus. They were ac­cused of block­ing of­fi­cers from clear­ing a crowd of pro­test­ers who blocked the gate from ve­hic­u­lar traf­fic. The stu­dent protest was sparked by an in­ci­dent in which a fe­male stu­dent was at­tacked by an in­trud­er and al­most raped. 

The duo was al­so rep­re­sent­ed by John Je­re­mie, SC, Prakash Ra­mad­har, Bri­an Baig and Keisha Kidd-Han­ni­bal. 


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored