JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, May 22, 2025

Venezuelans vote in referendum over large swath of territory under dispute with Guyana

by

536 days ago
20231203
President Nicolas Maduro votes in a referendum regarding Venezuela's claim to the Essequibo, a region administered and controlled by Guyana in Caracas, Venezuela, Sunday, Dec. 3, 2023. Voters will answer five questions about the future of the disputed land, including whether they support turning it into a Venezuelan state. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix)

President Nicolas Maduro votes in a referendum regarding Venezuela's claim to the Essequibo, a region administered and controlled by Guyana in Caracas, Venezuela, Sunday, Dec. 3, 2023. Voters will answer five questions about the future of the disputed land, including whether they support turning it into a Venezuelan state. (AP Photo/Matias Delacroix)

Venezue­lans are vot­ing in a ref­er­en­dum Sun­day to sup­pos­ed­ly de­cide the fu­ture of a large swath of neigh­bour­ing Guyana that their gov­ern­ment claims own­er­ship of, ar­gu­ing the ter­ri­to­ry was stolen when a north-south bor­der was drawn more than a cen­tu­ry ago.

Guyana con­sid­ers the ref­er­en­dum a step to­ward an­nex­a­tion, and the vote has its res­i­dents on edge. It asks Venezue­lans whether they sup­port es­tab­lish­ing a state in the dis­put­ed ter­ri­to­ry, known as Es­se­qui­bo, grant­i­ng cit­i­zen­ship to cur­rent and fu­ture area res­i­dents and re­ject­ing the ju­ris­dic­tion of the Unit­ed Na­tions’ top court in set­tling the dis­agree­ment be­tween the two South Amer­i­can coun­tries.

“We are solv­ing through con­sti­tu­tion­al, peace­ful and de­mo­c­ra­t­ic means an im­pe­r­i­al dis­pos­ses­sion of 150 years,” Pres­i­dent Nicolás Maduro said af­ter vot­ing in a mil­i­tary com­plex in Cara­cas, the cap­i­tal.

The In­ter­na­tion­al Court of Jus­tice on Fri­day or­dered Venezuela not to take any ac­tion that would al­ter Guyana’s con­trol over Es­se­qui­bo, but the judges did not specif­i­cal­ly ban of­fi­cials from car­ry­ing out Sun­day’s five-ques­tion ref­er­en­dum. Guyana had asked the court to or­der Venezuela to halt parts of the vote.

The le­gal and prac­ti­cal im­pli­ca­tions of the ref­er­en­dum re­main un­clear. But in com­ments ex­plain­ing Fri­day’s ver­dict, in­ter­na­tion­al court pres­i­dent Joan E. Donoghue said state­ments from Venezuela’s gov­ern­ment sug­gest it “is tak­ing steps with a view to­ward ac­quir­ing con­trol over and ad­min­is­ter­ing the ter­ri­to­ry in dis­pute.”

“Fur­ther­more, Venezue­lan mil­i­tary of­fi­cials an­nounced that Venezuela is tak­ing con­crete mea­sures to build an airstrip to serve as a ‘lo­gis­ti­cal sup­port point for the in­te­gral de­vel­op­ment of the Es­se­qui­bo,’” she said.

The 61,600-square-mile (159,500-square-kilo­me­ter) ter­ri­to­ry ac­counts for two-thirds of Guyana and al­so bor­ders Brazil, whose De­fense Min­istry ear­li­er this week in a state­ment said it has “in­ten­si­fied its de­fense ac­tions” and boost­ed its mil­i­tary pres­ence in the re­gion as a re­sult of the dis­pute.

Es­se­qui­bo is larg­er than Greece and rich in min­er­als. It al­so gives ac­cess to an area of the At­lantic where oil in com­mer­cial quan­ti­ties was dis­cov­ered in 2015, draw­ing the at­ten­tion of Maduro’s gov­ern­ment.

Venezuela’s gov­ern­ment pro­mot­ed the ref­er­en­dum for weeks, fram­ing par­tic­i­pa­tion as an act of pa­tri­o­tism, and of­ten con­flat­ing it with a show of sup­port for Maduro. His gov­ern­ment held a mock ref­er­en­dum last month, but it did not re­lease par­tic­i­pa­tion fig­ures or re­sults.

Venezuela has al­ways con­sid­ered Es­se­qui­bo as its own be­cause the re­gion was with­in its bound­aries dur­ing the Span­ish colo­nial pe­ri­od, and it has long dis­put­ed the bor­der de­cid­ed by in­ter­na­tion­al ar­bi­tra­tors in 1899 when Guyana was still a British colony.

That bound­ary was de­cid­ed by ar­bi­tra­tors from Britain, Rus­sia and the Unit­ed States. The U.S. rep­re­sent­ed Venezuela on the pan­el in part be­cause the Venezue­lan gov­ern­ment had bro­ken off diplo­mat­ic re­la­tions with Britain.

Venezue­lan of­fi­cials con­tend that Amer­i­cans and Eu­ro­peans con­spired to cheat their coun­try out of the land and ar­gue that a 1966 agree­ment to re­solve the dis­pute ef­fec­tive­ly nul­li­fied the orig­i­nal ar­bi­tra­tion.

Guyana, the on­ly Eng­lish-speak­ing coun­try in South Amer­i­ca, main­tains the ini­tial ac­cord is le­gal and bind­ing and asked the In­ter­na­tion­al Court of Jus­tice in 2018 to rule it as such, but a rul­ing is years away.

Vot­ers on Sun­day will have to an­swer whether they “agree to re­ject by all means, in ac­cor­dance with the law,” the 1899 bound­ary and whether they sup­port the 1966 agree­ment “as the on­ly valid le­gal in­stru­ment” to reach a so­lu­tion.

Maduro and his al­lies are urg­ing vot­ers to an­swer “yes” to all five ques­tions in the ref­er­en­dum.

Venezue­lans hold as self-ev­i­dent truth that their home­land’s east­ern end in­cludes the Es­se­qui­bo re­gion. They learn about the ter­ri­to­r­i­al dis­pute from a young age, with text­books in­clud­ing the his­tor­i­cal back­ground and maps mark­ing the ter­ri­to­ry with di­ag­o­nal lines.

Ad­min­is­tra­tive as­sis­tant Henghel Niño, 45, re­mem­bers those lessons. Out­side a vot­ing cen­tre in Cara­cas, she said she par­tic­i­pat­ed in the ref­er­en­dum be­cause Venezue­lans “must de­fend our Es­se­qui­bo.” But like many oth­er vot­ers, she was not clear about the ac­tions that could re­sult from the ref­er­en­dum’s re­sults.

“I imag­ine that (the Guyanese) must be wor­ried about the con­se­quences that this sit­u­a­tion may bring, but hey, we have to try to re­cov­er our lands be­cause there are many min­er­als there,” Niño said, adding that she be­lieved Venezuela’s gov­ern­ment or­ga­nized the ref­er­en­dum “to try to re­cov­er (Es­se­qui­bo) legal­ly” in a ne­go­ti­a­tion with Guyana.

“I imag­ine that the use of weapons would be the last al­ter­na­tive,” she said.

Guyana Pres­i­dent Mo­hamed Ir­faan Ali on Sun­day ac­knowl­edged the ap­pre­hen­sion many Guyanese have over the ref­er­en­dum and sought to re­as­sure them, telling them they have “noth­ing to fear over the next num­ber of hours, days, months ahead.” He said Guyana is us­ing diplo­ma­cy as its “first line of de­fense” and is work­ing con­tin­u­ous­ly to en­sure its bor­ders “re­main in­tact.”

“I am not go­ing to get in­to the in­ter­nal pol­i­tics of Venezuela and in­to their pol­i­cy-mak­ing, but I want to ad­vise Venezuela that this is an op­por­tu­ni­ty for them to show ma­tu­ri­ty, an op­por­tu­ni­ty for them to show re­spon­si­bil­i­ty, and we call up­on them once more join us in ... al­low­ing the rule of law to work and to de­ter­mine the out­come of this con­tro­ver­sy,” Ali said.

Gar­cia Cano re­port­ed from Mex­i­co City. As­so­ci­at­ed Press pho­tog­ra­ph­er Ma­tias Delacroix con­tributed to this re­port.

CARA­CAS, Venezuela (AP) —

GuyanaVenezuelaInstagramRegional


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored