Mariano Browne
Any investment requires analysis before committing. Energy projects are capital-intensive, meaning they are large-scale undertakings that require substantial upfront investment to acquire physical assets and heavy machinery, or to build infrastructure, before they can start operating or generating revenue—the more complex the project, the deeper the analysis, the longer the timeline to completion.
While no one can predict the future, it is better to identify and mitigate the risks before investing. These include technical analyses, such as seismic studies to determine the reservoir’s size, and exploration to corroborate the studies. Then, conduct a commercial and economic analysis to determine financial viability. All decisions must also explicitly consider the market. Is the world economy on a growth path or heading for a recession? Will international energy market prices be stable? What is the cost of extraction relative to market prices?
Then there is the estimation of other non-financial risks that can affect the project’s outcome. Contracts must be negotiated with governments first to secure the access rights on suitable terms and conditions before any final investment decision is made. The bottom line is that there will be no final investment decision unless there is the strong possibility of a healthy financial result. The result is that the timeline between discovery and commercialisation of an energy project can take an extended period.
For example, Kevin Ramnarine, former Minister of Energy, gave a historical timeline of the cross-border Cocuina-Manakin reservoir on his LinkedIn page. A cross-border reservoir is a hydrocarbon deposit which straddles the boundary between two countries, in this case Venezuela and T&T. The Cocuina was first discovered by Venezuela’s national oil company, PDVSA, in 1983, and the Manakin portion in T&T waters was discovered by BP seven years later, in 1990.
The field comprises several blocks. Venezuela awarded Statoil a block on its side of the border in 2003, a full 20 years after its discovery. The first appraisal well was drilled in 2006. Since the field/reservoir crosses national boundaries, it requires agreement between the parties to ensure that neither party drains the reservoir faster than the other, thereby ensuring efficient production and fair revenue sharing. A Framework Agreement between Venezuela and T&T on the Unitization of the field was developed in 2007 but was not signed until 2015.
Between 2015 and 2024, blocs on both sides of the border changed hands. In 2024, the Venezuelan Government awarded a 20-year licence to BP and NGC for Cocuina. This year, NGC acquired a 20 per cent stake in Manakin. If all goes well, first gas is expected in 2029, presuming that a final investment decision is made soon—29 years would have elapsed between discovery and production.
The Manatee project had a similar gestation period, from discovery in 1983 to the final investment decision in 1924 (41 years), with first gas expected in the second or third quarter of 2027 (44 years). Manatee’s production will not solve T&T’s gas supply crisis. Average daily gas production for 2026 is estimated at 2.5 billion cubic feet per day (bcfd). It will take time for Manatee to reach full production of 600 million cubic feet per day. In the meantime, other fields will decline. To stay in the same place or improve natural gas production requires continuous exploration to find new fields.
This is why developments on Venezuela’s Loran side of the field have attracted considerable attention and speculation about their impact on T&T. Venezuela has announced a multiphase licensing deal with energy majors. Phase 1 is assigned to Shell plc, while Phase Two licences have been granted to a consortium comprising bp plc, the UAE’s XRG, and Qatar’s UCC Holding.
XRD is an international lower-carbon energy, natural gas, and chemicals investment company launched by the Abu Dhabi National Oil Company (ADNOC). UCC Holding is a subsidiary of Qatar’s Power International Holding (PIH), an investment company that operates across the energy, mining, concessions, and construction sectors.
Shell has indicated that it intends to connect Loran gas resources, in parallel with its development of the adjacent Manatee field, to existing infrastructure in T&T. This would deliver major new volumes of natural gas directly to Trinidad’s processing infrastructure, supplementing domestic fields that have experienced shortfalls. This is exceedingly useful to Shell and BP, the majority owners of Atlantic LNG (ALNG). T&T will receive the full benefit of the Manatee field, including royalties, production-sharing rights, and a share of ALNG’s profits.
It is not clear that the same holds for the gas flowing from Loran. The terms and conditions are not yet known.
According to Acting President Rodriguez, Venezuela’s intent for Phases One and Two of the offshore Loran natural gas field is to aggressively develop and monetise its massive reserves to elevate Venezuela’s status as a major global gas exporter. This includes supplying Trinidad and Tobago’s established infrastructure while feeding domestic Venezuelan petrochemical and industrial needs.
Venezuela’s Loran announcements are positive developments. However, the devil is in the details. How will Venezuela be rewarded for its gas? Is ALNG buying Venezuela’s Loran gas as an input, or is the gas to be processed and exported through ALNG on a tolling basis? Will ALNG be paid a processing fee with the export proceeds going to Venezuela? BP’s partnership with XRD and UCC on Phase Two suggests a more complicated arrangement. What are the monetary benefits that will accrue to T&T from the Loran Phase One and Two?
Mariano Browne is the CEO of the UWI Arthur Lok Jack Global School of Business
