JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, July 10, 2025

Not good enough, Mr PM

by

2037 days ago
20191212
Editorial

Editorial

Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley yes­ter­day in­sist­ed that the now in­fa­mous Dar­ryl Smith mat­ter is over and that he as Prime Min­is­ter had done all he could, in­clud­ing de­mot­ing and even­tu­al­ly dis­miss­ing Smith from his Cab­i­net.

The Prime Min­is­ter in­sist­ed he did not have the au­thor­i­ty to do any­thing else since his pow­er over Mr Smith stopped at the point of his mem­ber­ship of the Cab­i­net.

Dr Row­ley spoke about the is­sue in Par­lia­ment, re­ply­ing to Op­po­si­tion ques­tions on the sta­tus of in­ves­ti­ga­tions in­to the Dar­ryl­Smith mat­ter. Op­po­si­tion MP Rod­ney Charles sought an­swers, not­ing re­cent claims by a mem­ber of the in­ves­tiga­tive team who ac­cused two se­nior Cab­i­net mem­bers of misog­y­ny.

Gov­ern­ment ap­point­ed the team last year to look in­to for­mer Sports Min­istry em­ploy­ee Car­rie Ann More­au's ter­mi­na­tion and a $150,000 set­tle­ment. Al­le­ga­tions of sex­u­al ha­rass­ment were in­volved and there was al­so the sign­ing of a non-dis­clo­sure agree­ment be­tween Ms More­au and the min­istry.

When the is­sue broke in April 2018, Dr Row­ley shift­ed Mr Smith to a ju­nior min­is­te­r­i­al po­si­tion then fired him from Gov­ern­ment a day af­ter claim­ing new in­for­ma­tion had sur­faced. He then ap­point­ed the probe team.

Their re­port was sub­mit­ted last year. In Oc­to­ber, At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Faris Al-Rawi and Dr Row­ley both said the re­port couldn't be used be­cause Mr Smith wasn't al­lowed to de­fend him­self. Row­ley yes­ter­day al­so said he knew of no one in the Cab­i­net who is guilty of misog­y­ny.

The Prime Min­is­ter seems to miss some cen­tral points that leave a bad taste in the mouths of cit­i­zens and for which his an­swers have so far not pro­vid­ed sig­nif­i­cant cause for com­fort nor clo­sure.

The fact is that to date the coun­try does not know the de­fin­i­tive sto­ry that led to the pay­out of $150,000 of tax­pay­ers' mon­ey to set­tle a case brought by Ms More­au which in­clud­ed al­le­ga­tions of sex­u­al ha­rass­ment against the for­mer min­is­ter.

To date, the coun­try does not know when the Prime Min­is­ter first heard of the on­go­ings at the Min­istry, which from all ac­counts in­volved more than one se­nior pub­lic of­fi­cial and the Prime Min­is­ter's lawyer.

The coun­try does not know what ac­tions are in place to pre­vent a re­cur­rence of what is al­leged to have tak­en place and there has not been a re­al sense of out­rage or con­dem­na­tion of the be­hav­iour that led to the ac­tion by Ms More­au.

What is al­so un­ac­cept­able is that a probe was an­nounced and the find­ings found to be un­us­able and there ap­pears to be lit­tle or no ap­petite to de­ter­mine what hap­pened.

Mr Prime Min­is­ter the coun­try de­mands to know the truth about what hap­pened and how we goy to the pay­ment of $150,000 of tax­pay­ers' dol­lars to a cit­i­zen who made se­ri­ous al­le­ga­tions against a mem­ber of your par­lia­men­tary team.

To say he is no longer in gov­ern­ment so the mat­ter is closed is to be in­sen­si­tive to the con­cerns of cit­i­zens. How do we know that Mr Smith is not, in fact, a vic­tim? You se­lect­ed Mr Smith as part of your par­ty's process. You cam­paigned for him and you put him in your Cab­i­net. Was this an er­ror of judge­ment?

Con­tin­ued fail­ure to push for trans­paren­cy in this mat­ter will con­tin­ue to open you and your gov­ern­ment up to al­le­ga­tions of a cov­er-up.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored