JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 26, 2025

Playing with ‘private’ and ‘public’

by

Shaffiat Hosein
1778 days ago
20200912

I find it so amaz­ing that there is so much ar­gu­ment about the le­gal in­ter­pre­ta­tions what is “pri­vate” and “pub­lic” in the wake of the Bayshore and oth­er par­ties. Even the AG has said that these de­ter­mi­na­tions are very com­plex. It seems we have lost our way try­ing to make laws and en­forc­ing them, we have for­got­ten the pur­pose of for­mu­lat­ing the laws to pre­vent COVID-19 spread.

Every­where we go there are re­minders of how to pre­vent COVID-19; so­cial dis­tanc­ing, wash your hands and sani­tise, wear your mask, no pub­lic gath­er­ing of more than five and so on. The ob­ject of these pro­to­cols and laws is to pre­vent the spread of this virus which is cur­rent­ly rav­aging our small coun­try.

Peo­ple who are or­gan­is­ing and at­tend­ing such par­ties are be­ing reck­less, ir­re­spon­si­ble and in­hu­mane be­cause though they may have the par­ty in a pri­vate set­ting, these pa­trons would even­tu­al­ly go back in­to so­ci­ety and be­come pos­si­ble spread­ers. Worse yet, when law en­force­ment vis­its such par­ties, they say they need a clar­i­fi­ca­tion of what is “pri­vate” and “pub­lic.”

That is not the is­sue. The is­sue is whether these peo­ple’s be­hav­iour is cal­cu­lat­ed to en­dan­ger the life of oth­er cit­i­zens present­ly and in the fu­ture.

It does not mat­ter whether they are pay­ing or non-pay­ing pa­trons. From what I saw on so­cial me­dia of the Bayshore fi­as­co, such a gath­er­ing and be­hav­iour would risk the lives of oth­er cit­i­zens and law en­force­ment should have tak­en de­ci­sive ac­tion.

Dur­ing the pe­ri­od when we were al­lowed to go back to Mosque, we were vis­it­ed by peo­ple from the Min­istry of Health, to wit­ness our pro­to­cols in place for COVID-19 pre­ven­tion. We were even asked to doc­u­ment these prac­tices and send it to the Min­istry of Health. We were hap­py to co­op­er­ate, and I thought that these peo­ple are re­al­ly work­ing.

We are liv­ing in times when law en­force­ment must use judge­ment, if any­one or group’s be­hav­iour is cal­cu­lat­ed to en­dan­ger the lives of oth­er cit­i­zens, by be­ing a pos­si­ble spread­er, then they must act de­ci­sive­ly.

I am not one call­ing for the right to go back to mosque for con­gre­ga­tion be­cause oth­ers are al­lowed to have their pri­vate/pub­lic par­ties. That de­feats the ob­jec­tive of this fight. But law en­force­ment must be just.

The re­cent be­hav­iour of law en­force­ment leaves me with the sad feel­ing of those lines from George Or­well’s, “An­i­mal Farm,” “All an­i­mals are equal but some an­i­mals are more equal than oth­ers.”

St Au­gus­tine


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored