Professor Hamid Ghany
The 50th anniversary of becoming a republic passed on August 1st this year. However, as we prepare to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the celebration of the public holiday on which the First Parliament of the Republic held its first sitting on September 24th, 1976, there were controversies associated with the wearing of African attire in the Senate back then.
The front page of the Trinidad Guardian for Wednesday, March 10th, 1976 had a story under the heading “Broomes’ dashiki holds up Senate”.
According to the report :
“Yesterday’s sitting of the Senate was delayed for an hour and 20 minutes on a problem of dress. One of the four new Senators who were sworn in, Mr John Broomes, leader of the African National Congress (ANC), turned up in a very bright yellow dashiki. Prior to the sitting, he was informed by the President of the Senate, Dr Wahid Ali, that his dress did not conform to the rules and regulations of the Senate. Mr Broomes indicated that he was not aware of the type of dress required. Further discussions followed between the President, the Leader of Government Business in the Senate – Senator Francis Prevatt – and other senior Senators. On the other hand, Mr Broomes consulted with his party members in the Public Gallery. At 2.50 pm, the sitting began. The President, after the opening prayer, informed the House of communications he had received from the Governor-General with respect to the revoking of appointments of previous Opposition Senators, and the appointment of new members…”
Broomes was recommended by then Opposition Leader, Roy Richardson, together with Alloy Lequay, Simbhoonath Capildeo and Charles Clarke. They replaced Lloyd Best, Denis Solomon, Hamlet Joseph and Ivan Laughlin, whose appointments as Opposition Senators had been revoked on February 25th. Broomes was granted an exception for March 9th only to take his oath.
In the Trinidad Guardian for Saturday, March 20th, 1976, under a photo on the front page titled “Senator Barred”, there was a picture of Senator Broomes and the caption read :
“Opposition Senator John Broomes (above) garbed in white ‘Jesus’ gown and slippers turned up for yesterday’s sitting of the Senate, but unlike the last sitting, he was not permitted to take his seat due to his attire.”
Broomes conceded on March 23rd. On the front page of the Trinidad Guardian for Wednesday, March 24th, 1976, the photo caption read “Senator Bows To Convention” and the commentary said :
“Opposition Senator John Broomes (right) turns up in conventional suit and tie for the sitting of the Senate. Just before taking his seat yesterday, he is seen chatting with Opposition colleague, Senator Charles Clarke and Independent Senator Thomas Gatcliffe (centre).”
Broomes was forced to surrender; otherwise he was going to be silenced. During his contribution to the Republic Bill, he said :
“…I had to conform in order to be able to speak and to contribute in whatever manner I can in this House. I had to conform to certain things which I did not want to do and I feel that is my human right involved. I was denied of that and I had a lot of trouble in convincing my followers that I should come, put on and conform, disguised as it were as a European…” (Hansard, Senate, March 23rd, 1976, p. 582).
The saga of Broomes and the demands of colonial attire in the Senate six years after the Black Power uprising and during the Senate debate on the Republic Bill confirmed the bluster of republicanism.
He stood up on a fundamental matter that dealt with the society and its colonial persistence. His episode demonstrated that we became a republic in law in 1976, but the backwardness of intolerance of diversity remained.
The message from the Senate was that African attire was not welcome. The PNM controlled the Parliament, and this could have been handled differently. But it was not.
After becoming a republic, the issue of Senate attire was raised again by Senate President Dr Ali as follows:
“…By convention of this Senate, male members have worn jackets and ties and representatives of religion have worn clerical garb. There is precedent regarding acceptable alternatives to the jackets and ties and with the approval of the President, Members have worn shirt-jac suits of sober colour and long sleeves in the Second and Third Parliament of Independent Trinidad and Tobago. The deviations from these standards that have taken place in this Parliament, have been without the consent of the President and in spite of his efforts to uphold the standards set…” (Hansard, Senate, October 5th, 1976, p. 15).
Broomes exposed the hypocritical underbelly of lingering colonialism alongside anti-colonial republican rhetoric. Why was African attire in Parliament deemed inappropriate when we became a republic in 1976?
Professor Hamid Ghany is a Professor of Constitutional Affairs and Parliamentary Studies at The University of the West Indies (UWI). He was also appointed an Honorary Professor of The UWI upon his retirement in October 2021. He continues his research and publications and also does some teaching at The UWI. He was selected by the THA to guide the discussions on Tobago autonomy.
