JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, July 3, 2025

Who pulled out? The Govt or Sandals?

by

Guardian Media
2359 days ago
20190118

Aiye­goro Ome

I am writ­ing be­fore Prime Min­is­ter Dr Row­ley makes a state­ment at the post-cab­i­net press con­fer­ence on Thurs­day how­ev­er, I feel that we may nev­er know if the T&T Gov­ern­ment has been hon­est about the back­ground to the San­dals pull­out.

From the re­cent press con­fer­ence, we know that mega-min­is­ter Mr Stu­art Young and the San­dals CEO, Mr Geb­hard Rainier, blamed neg­a­tive pub­lic­i­ty which Young at­trib­uted to "a hand­ful of peo­ple, some with agen­das and some with per­son­al agen­das".

But sup­pose the re­al rea­son is that the Gov­ern­ment on its own vo­li­tion and not San­dals de­cid­ed to with­draw from the deal fol­low­ing the rev­e­la­tions in the Oc­to­ber 2017 Mem­o­ran­dum of Un­der­stand­ing be­tween the Gov­ern­ment and San­dals Re­sorts?

Let us re­mem­ber that Afra Ray­mond had to dig out the MOU via the Free­dom of In­for­ma­tion Act, fol­low­ing a rul­ing from the Privy Coun­cil.

Re­mem­ber al­so that im­me­di­ate­ly pri­or to the press con­fer­ence there was a closed-door meet­ing be­tween Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley, Min­is­ter Young, San­dals CEO Rain­er and San­dals deputy chair­man Adam Stew­art at the Prime Min­is­ter's res­i­dence. What was the re­al agen­da at that meet­ing?

As Ray­mond was re­port­ed to have said in a Jan­u­ary 15, 2019, news­pa­per ar­ti­cle, head­lined "Neg­a­tive pub­lic­i­ty not re­al rea­son for San­dals pull­out"—"When the MOU was fi­nal­ly re­vealed af­ter my law­suit, the terms were shown to be law­ful with the State mak­ing all the cap­i­tal in­vest­ment, no guar­an­tees or quo­tas as to jobs, sup­pli­ers or ser­vices, Gov­ern­ment agree­ing to prompt­ly pro­vide as many work per­mits; trans­fer pric­ing was be­ing fa­cil­i­tat­ed via this agree­ment and San­dals was plac­ing no cap­i­tal at risk. None. It was re­al­ly To­ba­go love."

Pri­or to now, there was a De­cem­ber 10, 2018 ar­ti­cle head­lined "San­dals or laced up boots" writ­ten by Mr Regi­nald Du­mas, for­mer diplo­mat and head of the Pub­lic Ser­vice.

Du­mas wrote, "the priv­i­leges ac­cord­ed San­dals al­most sug­gest that a new state is be­ing cre­at­ed with­in the State of T&T. For in­stance, the Gov­ern­ment is to "ex­tend ap­plic­a­ble ben­e­fits…to be ne­go­ti­at­ed and agreed be­tween the par­ties to 'as­so­ci­at­ed' and/or 'af­fil­i­at­ed' com­pa­nies of San­dals and al­so to named non-res­i­dent con­sul­tants, con­trac­tors (etc) en­gaged by San­dals for all or any pur­pos­es re­lat­ing to the op­er­a­tion, ex­pan­sion…and main­te­nance of the re­sorts…" Is trans­fer mis­pric­ing there­by fa­cil­i­tat­ed?

"Al­so, San­dals "will have the op­tion to ex­tend the terms (of agree­ments en­tered in­to with the Gov­ern­ment) for…15 years (be­yond) the ini­tial 25…" I see no such op­tion for the Gov­ern­ment. Is there one? And if San­dals changes sta­tus from Man­age­ment Com­pa­ny to "own­er of the free­hold to the (ho­tels)", it will en­joy "in­cen­tives and tax re­liefs…no less favourable than those grant­ed (in the MoU)." No ifs, no buts."

If I am right, the state­ments made about the with­draw­al fall with­in the mind­set of the cur­rent ad­min­is­tra­tion which treats any crit­i­cism as "un­pa­tri­ot­ic", an­oth­er way of re­buk­ing the pub­lic for be­ing "farse and ou­ta place" when the pub­lic was just "mind­ing their own busi­ness"!

In oth­er words, the PNM is tak­ing up the di­rec­tive of the first prime min­is­ter and founder of the PNM, Dr Er­ic Williams who said words to the ef­fect, "when I speak, let no dog bark".

This Gov­ern­ment takes no re­spon­si­bil­i­ty for what has hap­pened with the San­dals fi­as­co and we are none the wis­er.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored