There has been no resolution in a legal dispute over a decision by the T&T Cycling Federation to hold impromptu trials one month before the Pan American Cycling Championships, which will take place in Chile in February next year.
High Court Judge Westmin James reserved his decision over an injunction against the trials after hearing lengthy submissions from lawyers for the federation and two cycling clubs and three professional cyclists on Tuesday.
Justice James gave lawyers for cycling clubs Just Living Daily Cycling Academy and Heatwave Cycling Club, and professional cyclists Njisane Phillip, Alexi Costa-Ramirez, and Makaira Wallace time to get their clients’ views on an offer made by the federation during the hearing.
They were also given an opportunity to file additional evidence before Justice James renders his decision on the interim relief, later this week.
On December 1, 2025, lawyers for the group filed a lawsuit over the federation’s decision to host the trials on January 17, a month before the championships.
Last week, they filed for the interim injunction stopping the trials.
In their court filings, obtained by Guardian Media, the group’s members claimed that they were only informed of the federation’s decision, taken in mid-September, on November 10.
They claimed that the move was in contravention of the federation’s selection policy, which states that trials should be scheduled to take place on or before 12 weeks prior to an event.
“The Defendant has acted without proper reason and/or justification in deviating from its own selection policy,” they said.
They contended that after concerns were raised over the move, the federation held an emergency meeting in which its members approved the move by a vote of 14 for and six against.
They claimed that the vote was unlawful as members were not fully informed of the situation.
“The Defendant has refused to reconsider its position in respect of the improper trials and has procured the most recent council vote by misleading the membership and/or failing or refusing to fully disclose pertinent documents to the Council, as to the state of affairs with respect of the ongoing litigation as between the parties in the instant claim,” they said.
They claimed that Phillip, Costa-Ramirez, and Wallace would be prejudiced by the decision as they are based abroad and would have to disrupt their training schedule and international commitments in order to participate.
“Since filing the instant claim, the third, fourth, and fifth Claimant’s international ranks have increased, further highlighting the absurdity of these last minute mandatory trials,” they said.
They also questioned whether the move may have an impact on the three athletes qualifying for the next Olympic games.
“The Claimants’ Olympic prospects are likely to be severely diminished and/or put in jeopardy as a consequence of the Defendant’s unlawful and/or improper decision to hold trials as the Pan American Cycling Championships is a key stepping stone to Olympic qualifications and/or if the Defendant can simply re-write selection policies and criteria on a whim with 24 hours’ notice it would set a dangerous precedent for any future selection process, including Olympic selections,” they said.
In response to the application, the federation filed affidavits from several members, who voted in favour of the trials at the meeting.
The members all claimed that they were informed of the group’s legal concerns over the move and still voted in favour of it as they felt it was the most fair and objective selection method in the circumstances.
The clubs and the cyclists were represented by Dr Emir Crowne, Matthew Gayle, and Jason Jones, of New City Chambers. The federation was represented by Zelica Haynes-Soo Hon, Kerri-Ann Oliverie, and Kalifa Lovelace.
