JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, July 27, 2025

Judge Gobin reserves TTFA decision for August 13

by

Derek Achong
1824 days ago
20200730

A group of for­mer T&T Foot­ball As­so­ci­a­tion (TTFA) ex­ec­u­tive of­fi­cers, is ex­pect­ed to find out whether they can pur­sue their law­suit over FI­FA’s con­tro­ver­sial de­ci­sion to re­move and re­place them with a nor­mal­i­sa­tion com­mit­tee, on Au­gust 13. 

Af­ter a lengthy vir­tu­al hear­ing on We3dnes­day, High Court Judge Car­ol Gob­in re­served her de­ci­sion on an ap­pli­ca­tion brought by FI­FA to strike out or stay the law­suit brought by for­mer TTFA pres­i­dent William Wal­lace and his ex­ec­u­tive team. 

Pre­sent­ing sub­mis­sions on FI­FA’s be­half, Se­nior Coun­sel Christo­pher Hamel-Smith re­peat­ed­ly stat­ed that the lo­cal High Court does not have ju­ris­dic­tion to en­ter­tain the law­suit as the leg­is­la­tion which es­tab­lished the TTFA and the or­gan­i­sa­tion’s con­sti­tu­tion states that such dis­putes should be re­solved through ar­bi­tra­tion. 

Hamel-Smith sug­gest­ed that the claus­es could have been re­moved from the con­sti­tu­tion if the TTFA de­sired but were not. 

Hamel-Smith al­so re­ject­ed Wal­lace and his col­leagues’ com­plaints about the Court of Ar­bi­tra­tion for Sport (CAS), which like FI­FA is based in Switzer­land and is the ar­bi­tra­tion body iden­ti­fied by it (FI­FA) for such dis­putes. 

Re­fer­ring to claims that the CAS is bi­ased based on its fail­ure to re­quire FI­FA to cov­er half of the 40,000 Swiss francs (TT$276,000) in costs as­so­ci­at­ed with the ap­peal to it, Hamel-Smith not­ed that it (CAS) was mere­ly stat­ing FI­FA’s long-stand­ing pol­i­cy in all cas­es in­volv­ing it. 

Hamel-Smith stat­ed that while Wal­lace and his team could have ap­plied for le­gal aid to cov­er the full cost of the ap­peal, as re­quired un­der the Swiss-court’s rules, they did not. 

“You may dis­agree with the de­ci­sion but that is not grounds for bias,” Hamel-Smith said, as he not­ed that court of­fi­cials who com­mu­ni­cat­ed with the par­ties would not be the ar­bi­tra­tors in the ap­peal. 

Re­spond­ing to the sub­mis­sions, Dr Emir Crowne, who is lead­ing the for­mer TTFA board mem­bers’ le­gal team, called on Gob­in to look past the claus­es which ap­pear to re­quire ar­bi­tra­tion as op­posed to lo­cal lit­i­ga­tion. 

Stat­ing that such re­quire­ments are in­op­er­a­ble and un­con­scionable, Crowne claimed that FI­FA forced their in­clu­sion at the ex­pense of the as­so­ci­a­tion and its mem­bers. 

“The crux of the mat­ter is when FI­FA says so, ap­par­ent­ly the world must bend to its will,” Crowne said. 

In terms of pro­ceed­ings be­fore the CAS, Crowne not­ed that his clients opt­ed to with­draw their pro­ceed­ings due to the gross in­equity in bar­gain­ing pow­er com­pared to FI­FA. 

Stat­ing that the CAS is a pri­vate ar­bi­tra­tion com­pa­ny, Crowne said his client was un­com­fort­able with its readi­ness to ac­cept FI­FA’s po­si­tion on pay­ing costs. 

“The fa­mil­iar­i­ty be­tween the par­ties shown gives us a gen­er­al cause of con­cern,” Crowne said. 

He al­so point­ed out that Switzer­land was an in­ap­pro­pri­ate fo­rum to re­solve such a le­gal dis­pute con­sid­er­ing the case sole in­volves T&T. 

Crowne al­so ques­tioned FI­FA’s claim that it may with­hold fund­ing for lo­cal foot­ball if Gob­in de­cides to re­ject its ap­pli­ca­tion and hear the case. 

“That can­not be a prop­er ar­gu­ment to a court. That can­not be cor­rect,” Crowne said. 

Through the lo­cal law­suit, Wal­lace and his three vice pres­i­dents — Clynt Tay­lor, Joseph Sam Phillips, and Su­san Joseph-War­rick are seek­ing a de­c­la­ra­tion that the de­ci­sion to re­move them in March and re­place them with a com­mit­tee head­ed by busi­ness­man Robert Hadad, was null, void, and of no le­gal or bind­ing ef­fect. 

They are al­so seek­ing a per­ma­nent in­junc­tion bar­ring FI­FA from med­dling in the TTFA’s af­fair by al­leged­ly seek­ing to cir­cum­vent the de­mo­c­ra­t­ic process by re­mov­ing the du­ly elect­ed ex­ec­u­tive mem­bers. 

In the event that Gob­in re­jects FI­FA’s ap­pli­ca­tion, the case be­fore her will con­tin­ue. If the ap­pli­ca­tion is up­held, Wal­lace and his col­leagues will have to ei­ther abide by FI­FA’s de­ci­sion or at­tempt to re­vive their ap­peal be­fore the CAS. 

Wal­lace and his col­leagues are al­so be­ing rep­re­sent­ed by Dr Emir Crowne, Matthew Gayle, Crys­tal Paul, and Ja­son Jones, while Jonathan Walk­er and Cherie Gopie ap­peared along­side Hamel-Smith for FI­FA. 


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored