JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, July 24, 2025

New CONCACAF W/Cup format 2 years old

by

Walter Alibey
2198 days ago
20190718

Caribbean Foot­ball Union (CFU) mem­ber coun­tries re­port­ed­ly dis­cussed the new 2022 World Cup qual­i­fi­ca­tion for­mat for the CON­CA­CAF re­gion two years ago and agreed with the move in prin­ci­ple.

How­ev­er, yes­ter­day, Grena­da Foot­ball As­so­ci­a­tion (GFA) pres­i­dent Ch­eney Joseph and Ja­maican Foot­ball Fed­er­a­tion (JFF) coun­ter­part Michael Rick­etts gave con­flict­ing re­ports on how the dis­cus­sion went down in the lead-up to CON­CA­CAF's new for­mat an­nounce­ment last week.

In its an­nounce­ment last week, CON­CA­CAF said the team ranked in the top six by FI­FA in Sep­tem­ber 2020 will en­ter a Hexag­o­nal phase com­pe­ti­tion to play for three guar­an­teed places in the World Cup. The sec­ond part of the qual­i­fiers will be played in a group stage among CON­CA­CAF coun­tries ranked 7-35 ac­cord­ing and the top team from these qual­i­fiers will earn the right to face the fourth-place team from the Hexag­o­nal stage for the right to en­ter a fi­nal play-off with an­oth­er Con­fed­er­a­tion, ei­ther Ocea­nia or Asia, for an­oth­er spot in the World Cup.

But this is in to­tal con­trast to the pre­vi­ous qual­i­fy­ing sys­tem, in which teams pro­gressed the 'Hex' based on their per­for­mance and place­ment in the dif­fer­ent group qual­i­fiers.

This sparked de­bate in foot­ball cir­cles on whether the move was de­signed to ben­e­fit the CON­CA­CAF pow­er­hous­es to the detri­ment of the weak­er CFU teams, since the low­er ranked teams would have to play more foot­ball and would not get a chance top up­set the top teams for the three au­to­mat­ic spots, in the first in­stance.

Ad­dress­ing the is­sue yes­ter­day, though, Joseph con­firmed that a pro­pos­al for this change was made to CFU mem­bers about two years ago, while Rick­etts said it came from a re­cent meet­ing and there was no re­sis­tance from the mem­bers.

In fact, Ch­eney told Guardian Me­dia Sports that on­ly T&T Foot­ball As­so­ci­a­tion pres­i­dent David John-Williams ob­ject­ed to the de­ci­sion to change the qual­i­fy­ing for­mat but that came af­ter it was al­ready made.

Rick­etts said a meet­ing of all the CON­CA­CAF mem­bers was held soon af­ter the re­cent CON­CA­CAF Gold Cup and CFU mem­bers all sup­port­ed the change.

"I sup­port­ed it, maybe not vot­ed, and it will cer­tain­ly have neg­a­tive im­pli­ca­tions on some teams. In fact, my own coun­try, be­cause we are in Pool B of the Na­tions' League, we have got to be care­ful, as we have got to be hope­ful, that oth­er teams can be the top teams and could take the lead, as it re­lates to our po­si­tion right now," Rick­etts said.

Both Rick­etts and Joseph pledged their sup­port for the new for­mat, say­ing it will re­quire re­gion­al mem­bers to put the nec­es­sary pro­grammes in place to be among the top qual­i­fy­ing na­tions.

But Rick­etts could not an­swer ques­tions on how CON­CA­CAF ar­rived at the fi­nal de­ci­sion, say­ing it was made at the CON­CA­CAF Coun­cil and tak­en to the gen­er­al mem­ber­ship, where no ob­jec­tions were raised.

"It was tabled at a meet­ing we had and I sup­pose you would have had op­tions to dis­agree or not to dis­agree, but it was pre­sent­ed and I per­son­al­ly liked it, so I sup­port­ed it. And I would think if you nev­er agreed, you could have ex­pressed your de­sire and ex­pressed your dis­agree­ment, but no­body did so it means there­fore, it was tak­en that all of us would have sup­port­ed it," Rick­etts ex­plained.

Joseph said they could look at it from the stand­point of the for­mat putting teams at a dis­ad­van­tage, or they can see it as an op­por­tu­ni­ty to put the right pro­gramme in place to fa­cil­i­tate de­vel­op­ment and bet­ter their per­for­mances in the fu­ture.

Al­so con­tact­ed yes­ter­day, TTFA pres­i­dent John-Williams re­fused to com­ment, say­ing he want­ed to go through the right chan­nels.

Mean­while, for­mer CON­CA­CAF and CFU pres­i­dent Austin Jack Warn­er said the change was done de­lib­er­ate­ly to get back at him.

"It was done in a most clan­des­tine man­ner by Mr Sunil Gu­lati, of the US Soc­cer Fed­er­a­tion, the de­fac­to pres­i­dent of CON­CA­CAF, and this was done to get at Jack Warn­er. In a se­cret meet­ing in New York, he sat down with the pres­i­dents, who have no re­al pow­er cause he has it, and said since they can­not get Jack Warn­er, let them go af­ter T&T. That was done to keep T&T out, and that they nev­er, ever again, have to face the hu­mil­i­a­tion they faced in 2017."

Warn­er, of course, was re­fer­ring to the 2-1 de­feat T&T hand­ed to the Unit­ed States in Oc­to­ber 2017 at the Ato Boldon Sta­di­um in Cou­va which dumped them out the last World Cup in Rus­sia.

How­ev­erm, he said it would have been pos­si­ble for the CFU to get the de­ciswion ovetru­end if they wished.

Said Warn­er, "The CFU, if they had one func­tion­ing, could de­mand a spe­cial meet­ing of the Con­gress, and call a meet­ing to over­turn that de­ci­sion. Or bet­ter yet ,write to the FI­FA be­cause they are be­ing un­fair. It is an in­jus­tice, it is wrong, it is meant to stran­gle the Caribbean and most im­por­tant­ly T&T, that the rich coun­tries are play­ing less match­es and the poor­er ones are play­ing more match­es. And worse again, the FI­FA rank­ing is flawed."

He al­so de­nied re­ports that the de­ci­sion had re­ceived the sup­port from the CFU, say­ing there was nev­er a meet­ing of the CFU and that the on­ly re­ceived the sup­port from the of­fices of Bar­ba­dos and Ja­maica.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored