The Guardian editorial "Probe CL Financial collapse" (Jan 30) mentioned three causes identified by the Central Bank Governor for the collapse. In simple language the causes were that CL Financial was luring depositors with promises of interest rates which were excessive, using its assets to borrow money beyond their value, and transferring money from one company to another without adequate safeguards. In fact these are the very reasons advanced by the Minister of Finance for not bailing out the Hindu Credit Union. Of course the jargon utilised is so convoluted that any number of interpretations are possible. What is incontestable is that wealthy investors had no money in the HCU, and none of the HCU investors had enough clout with the Government to influence a bailout.
There is one lesson that has been learnt, that is, that if you want to secure the financial strength of your institution you must ensure that you are able to attract investment from people with influence. No other lessons have been learnt, if you consider that there is no evidence that the monitoring and oversight of financial institutions are more stringent than before. CJ Financial has been treated as an aberration. No other institution has admitted to any such misfeasance and the regulators show no greater concern for operations in the finance sector than before. The Guardian's call will remain a voice in the wilderness, being given little regard because accountability is foreign to our society.
Karan Mahabirsingh
Chase Village
