JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, May 16, 2025

Protesters demand answers

...Row­ley presents pe­ti­tion on Sec­tion 34 to act­ing Pres­i­dent

by

20120918

Ex­plain please, Prime Min­is­ter! Op­po­si­tion Leader Kei­th Row­ley has asked act­ing Pres­i­dent Tim­o­thy Hamel-Smith to call on Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar to ex­plain in de­tail how the procla­ma­tion of the con­tro­ver­sial Sec­tion 34 of the Ad­min­is­tra­tion of Jus­tice (In­dictable Of­fences) Act 2011 arose. Backed by a large crowd of marchers-in­clud­ing some for­mer po­lit­i­cal foes-Row­ley took a pe­ti­tion to Hamel-Smith along with a pe­ti­tion of 25,000 sig­na­tures which the Op­po­si­tion PNM said they gath­ered in 48 hours.

Hamel-Smith is act­ing Pres­i­dent in the ab­sence of Pres­i­dent George Maxwell Richards who left for New Zealand yes­ter­day to at­tend a con­fer­ence and will pro­ceed on hol­i­days af­ter. The is­sue of Sec­tion 34 has con­tin­ued to gen­er­ate con­tro­ver­sy de­spite last week's re­peal of the leg­is­la­tion by Par­lia­ment. The Gov­ern­ment moved to re­peal the sec­tion af­ter grow­ing con­cern that it will al­low peo­ple who had cas­es out­stand­ing for more than ten years, in­clud­ing busi­ness­men Ish Gal­barans­ingh and Steve Fer­gu­son who are fac­ing fraud charges, to go free.

Hun­dreds call on Gov­ern­ment for an­swers in march with Row­ley

Yes­ter­day, Row­ley led the Op­po­si­tion's march con­cern­ing the gen­e­sis of the is­sue-the Au­gust 31 procla­ma­tion of the clause. Walk­ing with Row­ley and PNM mem­bers were for­mer PP?part­ner, Move­ment for So­cial Jus­tice leader David Ab­du­lah, BIG­WU's Vin­cent Cabr­era, DNA?leader Kirk Meighoo and for­mer COP deputy leader Robert May­ers.

Al­so present were for­mer Sen­ate Pres­i­dent Michael Williams, Kirk Wait­he, of Fix­in' T&T, plus ac­tivist Raul Bermudez, busi­ness peo­ple, pen­sion­ers and trade union mem­bers. Ad­dress­ing the crowd, Ab­du­lah not­ed the "peo­ple pow­er" and called for them to or­gan­ise more broad­ly in­to a "grand coali­tion of a peo­ple's democ­ra­cy to bring about the kind of gov­er­nance of eq­ui­ty and jus­tice" which, he said, T&T yearned for.

The march, which be­gan at 1.30 pm out­side the Red House on Aber­crom­by Street, wend­ed its way peace­ful­ly to­wards the Queen's Park Sa­van­nah and in a snaking red line around the Sa­van­nah to Pres­i­dent's House. Row­ley en­tered Pres­i­dent's House at 3.05 pm bear­ing the pe­ti­tion. He was ac­com­pa­nied by Ab­du­lah, Cabr­era, Meighoo and PNM's Camille Robin­son-Reg­is, Franklin Khan and Fitzger­ald Hinds. They spent al­most 50 min­utes with Hamel-Smith.

The pe­ti­tion not­ed is­sues from the No­vem­ber rul­ing by Jus­tice Boodoos­ingh on the ex­tra­di­tion of Gal­barans­ingh and Fer­gu­son to the US to the procla­ma­tion of Sec­tion 34. The PNM not­ed that when it was pro­claimed, none of the as­sur­ances they said they were giv­en in the Par­lia­ment were met.

The pe­ti­tion stat­ed that at the time the sec­tion was pro­claimed, "the Jus­tice Min­is­ter who had the port­fo­lio re­spon­si­ble for the Cab­i­net note that the At­tor­ney?Gen­er­al prompt­ly act­ed up­on, en­joyed and con­tin­ues to en­joy a close re­la­tion­ship with at least one of the ben­e­fi­cia­ries of the amnesty in the act."

Row­ley lat­er told the crowd-gath­ered in the Sa­van­nah op­po­site Pres­i­dent's House-that he took the is­sue to the Pres­i­dent's of­fice since the head of state is not a rub­ber stamp and is re­spon­si­ble for re­ceiv­ing re­ports from the PM on the state of T&T.

He said he asked the Pres­i­dent to trace the doc­u­ments that sought procla­ma­tion of the clause back­wards to its ori­gin and to make sure that at every stage of pro­ceed­ings-in­clud­ing the draft­ing of the Cab­i­net note on the is­sue-that rules and reg­u­la­tions were fol­lowed. He al­so asked the Pres­i­dent to de­mand a writ­ten ex­pla­na­tion from the Prime Min­is­ter on the rea­sons for the de­ci­sion of the Cab­i­net which act­ed in breach of Par­lia­ment's trust.

Row­ley said he al­so wants the Pres­i­dent to ur­gent­ly raise the na­tion­al out­rage on the is­sue with the Prime Min­is­ter. As well, Row­ley re­quest­ed the Pres­i­dent to ask the Prime Min­is­ter to re­voke the ap­point­ments of At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Anand Ram­lo­gan and Jus­tice Min­is­ter Her­bert Vol­ney The pe­ti­tion al­so wants the Pres­i­dent to re­port to the coun­try on the find­ings.

"We're cer­tain the Pres­i­dent will talk to the na­tion on these mat­ters. T&T is in cri­sis,"?Row­ley said. Ac­cus­ing the Gov­ern­ment of be­tray­ing the Par­lia­ment and us­ing the Cab­i­net, Row­ley said the Prime Min­is­ter had at­tend­ed last week's Par­lia­ment de­bate on the is­sue, yet didn't speak. "If a cri­sis like this had risen in New Zealand, In­dia, Aus­tralia or Cana­da, you think the Prime Min­is­ter there would have gone to Par­lia­ment and had not a word to say?

"We're gov­erned by a coali­tion and its leader had noth­ing to say and the sec­ond tier leader-of the COP-had noth­ing to say," he said.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored