JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, June 6, 2025

By World Bank measurement: Most of T&T's labour force is middle class

by

20121115

By World Bank stan­dards, al­most the en­tire work­ing pop­u­la­tion of T&T should be earn­ing an in­come that qual­i­fies them to be in­clud­ed in the coun­try's mid­dle class.

In a re­port re­leased Tues­day, en­ti­tled "Eco­nom­ic Mo­bil­i­ty and the Rise of the Latin Amer­i­can Mid­dle Class"the World Bank said that the in­come de­f­i­n­i­tion of the mid­dle class in Latin Amer­i­ca and the Caribbean is be­tween US$10 and US$50 per day. That works out be­tween $64 and $320 per day.

In 2011, the gov­ern­ment in­creased T&T's min­i­mum wage to $12.50 per hour which works out to be $100 per day and US$15.62 per day. This means that even a work­er earn­ing the min­i­mum wage in T&T's for­mal em­ploy­ment sec­tor qual­i­fies to be in­clud­ed in the coun­try's mid­dle class, ac­cord­ing to the World Bank met­ric.

At US$15.62 a day, T&T's min­i­mum wage is 50 per cent high­er than the low­est thresh­old of the World Bank de­f­i­n­i­tion of mid­dle class. T&T has a pop­u­la­tion of ap­prox­i­mate­ly 1.3 mil­lion and a work­force of 616,400 as at De­cem­ber 2011, ac­cord­ing to the Re­view of the Econ­o­my pub­lished by the Min­istry of Fi­nance in 2012.

At the pre­vi­ous min­i­mum wage of $9 per hour, most of the coun­try's work­ing pop­u­la­tion would still qual­i­fy to be in­clud­ed in the mid­dle class. The $12.50 per hour min­i­mum wage came in­to ef­fect in T&T in 2011. The pre­vi­ous min­i­mum wage of $9 per hour came in­to ef­fect in 2005. Pri­or to that, the na­tion­al min­i­mum wage was $7 per hour, in ef­fect since 2003. There­fore pri­or to 2005, min­i­mum wage earn­ers would not have qual­i­fied as mid­dle class us­ing the World Bank stan­dard.

Still, ac­cord­ing to the World Bank, T&T en­joyed the high­est Gross Do­mes­tic Prod­uct (GDP) per capi­ta in Latin Amer­i­ca and the Caribbean dur­ing the pe­ri­od 2000 to 2010. (See Fig­ure 3.)

The over­ar­ch­ing claim of the re­port is that "af­ter decades of stag­na­tion, the size of the mid­dle class in Latin Amer­i­ca and the Caribbean re­cent­ly ex­pand­ed by 50 per cent – from 103 mil­lion peo­ple in 2003 to 152 mil­lion (or 30 per cent of the con­ti­nent's pop­u­la­tion) in 2009.

"Over the same pe­ri­od, as house­hold in­comes grew and in­equal­i­ty edged down­ward in most coun­tries, the pro­por­tion of peo­ple in pover­ty fell marked­ly: from 44 per cent to 30 per cent. As a re­sult, the mid­dle class and the poor now ac­count for rough­ly the same share of Latin Amer­i­ca's pop­u­la­tion."This is in stark con­trast to the sit­u­a­tion pre­vail­ing "for a long pe­ri­od"un­til about 10 years ago, when the share of the poor hov­ered around 2.5 times that of the mid­dle class, the World Bank said.

The study, co-au­thored by Fran­cis­co H. G. Fer­reira, Ju­lian Messi­na, Jamele Rigoli­ni, Luis-Fe­lipe L�pez-Cal­va, Maria Ana Lu­go, and Renos Vakis, "in­ves­ti­gates the na­ture, de­ter­mi­nants, and pos­si­ble con­se­quences of this re­mark­able process of so­cial trans­for­ma­tion,"the World Bank said.

The study said: "Such large changes in the size and com­po­si­tion of so­cial class­es must, by de­f­i­n­i­tion, im­ply sub­stan­tial eco­nom­ic mo­bil­i­ty of some form. A large num­ber of peo­ple who were poor in the late 1990s are now no longer poor. Oth­ers who were not yet mid­dle class have now joined its ranks."

Up­per class

The study yields an in­come thresh­old of US$10 per day, at pur­chas­ing pow­er par­i­ty (PPP) ex­change rates, as its low­er-bound per capi­ta house­hold in­come for the mid­dle class. The up­per in­come thresh­old for the mid­dle class is set at US$50 per capi­ta per day, based pri­mar­i­ly on sur­vey da­ta con­sid­er­a­tions by the World Bank. Per­sons mak­ing above US$50 per day are part of the "up­per class,"ac­cord­ing to the World Bank.

Ac­cord­ing to the re­port, "some of the key fac­tors fa­vor­ing the up­ward mo­bil­i­ty in Latin Amer­i­ca were high­er lev­els of ed­u­ca­tion among work­ers; high­er em­ploy­ment in the for­mal sec­tor; more peo­ple liv­ing in ur­ban ar­eas; more women in the labour force; and small­er fam­i­lies."

Ac­cord­ing to the then Min­istry of Sci­ence, Tech­nol­o­gy and Ter­tiary Ed­u­ca­tion, the ter­tiary ed­u­ca­tion par­tic­i­pa­tion rate in T&T steadi­ly in­creased from 2001 to 2008, from 7 per cent to 40 per cent. (See Fig­ure 1.) En­roll­ment in the coun­try's ma­jor ter­tiary lev­el in­sti­tu­tions al­so in­creased from 6,000 in 2001 to 28,000 in 2009. (See Fig­ure 2.)

In its pitch to at­tract for­eign in­vestors from the fi­nan­cial sec­tor, the Trinidad and To­ba­go In­ter­na­tion­al Fi­nan­cial Cen­tre says on its web­site that the T&T gov­ern­ment has in­vest­ed heav­i­ly, ap­prox­i­mate­ly US$2 bil­lion in ter­tiary ed­u­ca­tion over the last decade.

It al­so notes that gov­ern­ment cre­at­ed the Gov­ern­ment As­sis­tance for Tu­ition Ex­pense (GATE) in 2004. GATE ful­ly sub­si­dizes ter­tiary ed­u­ca­tion. Gov­ern­ment al­so cre­at­ed the High­er Ed­u­ca­tion Loan Pro­gram (HELP) in 2006, which is a spe­cial soft loan fa­cil­i­ty cre­at­ed for use by ter­tiary stu­dents. As of the 2009-2010 aca­d­e­m­ic year, there were ap­prox­i­mate­ly 70,000 stu­dents en­rolled in over 80 post sec­ondary and ter­tiary ed­u­ca­tion in­sti­tu­tions, the TTIFC says. The Uni­ver­si­ty of the West In­dies, St. Au­gus­tine cam­pus, has the largest en­rol­ment of about 17,000 stu­dents. The School of Busi­ness and Com­put­er Sci­ence has sec­ond largest en­roll­ment at about 12,200 stu­dents.

Kim: World must learn from LAC

Dur­ing a con­fer­ence call to re­lease the study, the Wash­ing­ton-based Pres­i­dent of the World Bank Dr. Jim Yong Kim said: "Mid­dle class growth in Latin Amer­i­ca and the Caribbean should stand as an ex­am­ple to in­spire rest of the world."He said the re­gion must now "fo­cus on 7 per cent of Latin Amer­i­cans with­out ac­cess to clean wa­ter and 20 per cent with­out san­i­ta­tion."Kim said that in spite of the growth of the mid­dle class in Latin Amer­i­ca, there is still "much to do."

That notwith­stand­ing, Kim said: "Gov­ern­ments in Latin Amer­i­ca have proved their abil­i­ty to cre­ate con­di­tions for eco­nom­ic growth and pover­ty re­duc­tion."Kim said he was "sure Latin Amer­i­ca would bal­ance its com­pli­cat­ed eco­nom­ic sit­u­a­tion so that the mid­dle class con­tin­ues to grow."

The study placed heavy em­pha­sis on parental back­ground and ed­u­ca­tion lev­els as fac­tors in­flu­enc­ing a per­son's abil­i­ty to be in the mid­dle class. "Parental back­ground in­flu­ences chil­dren's out­comes through a va­ri­ety of chan­nels,"the study said. "Even be­fore chil­dren are born, ma­ter­nal nu­tri­tion and health dur­ing ges­ta­tion have an im­pact on chil­dren en­dow­ments at birth. In turn, there is in­creas­ing em­pir­i­cal ev­i­dence sug­gest­ing that these birth en­dow­ments have an in­flu­ence on adult out­comes, in­clud­ing ed­u­ca­tion­al at­tain­ment and in­comes."

Par­ents af­fect chil­dren through hered­i­ty of ge­net­ic en­dow­ments, which in turn af­fects chil­dren's school­ing and in­come, an as­pect first for­mal­ized by the sem­i­nal work of Beck­er and Tomes (1979), the World Bank said. In ad­di­tion, parental abil­i­ty in­flu­ences their own ed­u­ca­tion­al at­tain­ment and thus their in­come. To­geth­er, these de­ter­mine the lev­el of "home in­vest­ments"in off­spring (in­clud­ing time spent with the chil­dren and the qual­i­ty and quan­ti­ty of goods and ser­vices de­liv­ered to them), which, in turn, will af­fect the fi­nal school­ing lev­el.

Fur­ther­more, parental in­come ex­erts a di­rect in­flu­ence on fi­nal school­ing (through the choice of school) and on the chil­dren's even­tu­al in­come (through net­works and con­nec­tions in the labour mar­ket), the World Bank said. "Fi­nal­ly, the school­ing lev­el at­tained by the chil­dren will af­fect their in­come lat­er in life and fur­ther ex­pe­ri­ence through the la­bor mar­ket (post-school in­vest­ments). All of these fac­tors, in turn, af­fect their own chil­dren's earn­ings and in­come,"the study said.

The ap­pear­ance of a strong mid­dle class is, for many coun­tries, a rel­a­tive­ly new phe­nom­e­non, the World Bank said. Be­tween 2003 and 2009, the Latin Amer­i­can mid­dle class grew at an an­nu­al­ized rate of 6.7 per cent, from slight­ly above 100 mil­lion peo­ple to more than 150 mil­lion. In 2008, for the first time, there were al­most as many peo­ple in the mid­dle class as in pover­ty (152 mil­lion and 158 mil­lion, re­spec­tive­ly).

"De­spite the glob­al fi­nan­cial cri­sis, the trend re­vert­ed on­ly min­i­mal­ly in 2009,"the study said. This dra­mat­ic in­crease in the mid­dle class con­trasts strong­ly with the lag­ging per­for­mance of the 1990s–a "lost decade"for the mid­dle class, dur­ing which its size fluc­tu­at­ed at around 21 per cent of the pop­u­la­tion for most of the decade, bare­ly keep­ing pace with pop­u­la­tion growth, the World Bank said.

The study said the over­all class-re­lat­ed trends al­so hide het­ero­geneities across coun­tries. In Ar­genti­na, Chile, and Pe­ru, the mid­dle class in­creased by more than 10 per­cent­age points be­tween 2000 and 2010, while in the Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic, El Sal­vador, and Uruguay, it ac­tu­al­ly shrank. Over­all, how­ev­er, most coun­tries ex­pe­ri­enced a large surge in their mid­dle class­es, so that the ag­gre­gate trend for Latin Amer­i­ca did not hinge on­ly on the mas­sive in­crease of the Brazil­ian mid­dle class, which alone con­tributed more than 40 per cent of the over­all in­crease in the re­gion, the bank said.

In­flu­en­tial fac­tors in mid­dle-class growth

Al­though im­por­tant, eco­nom­ic growth is not the on­ly dri­ver of the in­crease in mid­dle class, the study said. Coun­tries with sim­i­lar growth rates at times dif­fered sig­nif­i­cant­ly in terms of mid­dle-class growth.

"The Do­mini­can Re­pub­lic, for in­stance, ex­pe­ri­enced a high­er growth rate than Ecuador be­tween 2000 and 2010, but its mid­dle class shrank, while Ecuador's grew by more than 15 per­cent­age points. This dif­fer­ence clear­ly in­di­cates that sev­er­al oth­er fac­tors in­flu­ence the growth of the mid­dle class,"the study said.

A pure­ly me­chan­i­cal fac­tor that is of­ten over­looked con­cerns dif­fer­ences in ini­tial con­di­tions, the study said. How much the mid­dle class in­creas­es for each per­cent­age point of growth de­pends on where the mid­dle class thresh­old of US$10 per capi­ta per day cross­es each coun­try's in­come dis­tri­b­u­tion.

The study said that by sim­ple "me­chan­ics,"in poor­er coun­tries such as Hon­duras, 1 per­cent­age point of growth will bring small­er growth of the mid­dle class than it will in wealth­i­er coun­tries such as Uruguay, where the mid­dle class thresh­old cross­es the in­come dis­tri­b­u­tion near­er the mode (where pop­u­la­tion den­si­ty is high­er and, thus, more peo­ple change class for the same growth per­for­mance).

Fore­casts for pover­ty re­duc­tion,mid­dle-class growth

Pover­ty re­duc­tion and the rise of the mid­dle class are ex­pect­ed to con­tin­ue for the next two decades, al­beit at a slow­er pace, the world bank re­port said. The au­thors of the study agree with Bus­so­lo and Mu­rard (2011) who fore­cast pover­ty and mid­dle-class lev­els in 2030 for both Latin Amer­i­ca and the emerg­ing world.

Bus­so­lo and Mu­rard base their fore­casts, they said, on two tools de­vel­oped by the De­vel­op­ment Eco­nom­ic Prospects Group of the World Bank: (a) a LINK­AGE glob­al com­putable gen­er­al equi­lib­ri­um (CGE) mod­el that feeds in­to a (b) Glob­al In­come Dis­tri­b­u­tion Dy­nam­ics (GIDD) sim­u­la­tion.

The study said that by 2030, 42 per cent of Latin Amer­i­cans are ex­pect­ed to be in the mid­dle class, up from 29 per­cent in 2009. How­ev­er, al­most a fifth (18 per cent) will re­main in pover­ty. Over the next two decades, pover­ty is thus ex­pect­ed to fall by ap­prox­i­mate­ly 14 per­cent­age points– a slow­er de­cline than the re­cent one, where pover­ty fell by more than 10 per­cent­age points dur­ing the 2000s.

Low­er rates of pover­ty re­duc­tion are ex­pect­ed, both be­cause the pover­ty gap re­mains rel­a­tive­ly high in the re­gion (hence, some of the re­main­ing poor are far from the pover­ty line of US$4 per capi­ta a day), and be­cause of low­er long-term growth fore­casts with re­spect to the re­cent boom. The study called on read­ers to "ob­serve, al­so, that the pro­por­tion of peo­ple in the vul­ner­a­ble group is ex­pect­ed to re­main at cur­rent lev­els un­til at least 2030."


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored