Education is one of the principal drivers of national development. It develops human capital, institutions, values and innovation capacity that enable sustained economic, social and political progress. These reasons have been the drivers behind the substantial investment in education since self-government in 1956. The difficulty in developing countries such as Trinidad and Tobago is that the national economy does not grow fast enough to absorb all its school leavers.
Furthermore, the world is increasingly interconnected. Even with restrictions on immigration imposed by developed countries, people are increasingly mobile. The result is that developing countries collectively lose a large part of their educated elite to more developed countries. The emigration rate increases significantly with higher education levels and is particularly high in small island developing states. Hence the term “brain drain”: the loss of a country’s skilled professionals to more developed countries.
While estimates vary, T&T has one of the highest rates of highly skilled emigration in the world, with between 64% and 75% of its tertiary-educated graduates eventually emigrating to OECD countries. In general, emigration rates also increase when social conditions deteriorate or the economy is depressed. Trinidad and Tobago’s economy has been depressed since 2014 and the crime rate has worsened in the last 25 years.
It could be argued that a high rate of emigration leads to a high level of remittances. This argument may hold in other countries, but T&T does not compare well with its Caribbean neighbours in this regard. Trinidad and Tobago receives the lowest level of incoming remittances compared to Barbados, Guyana, and Jamaica. Remittances account for less than 1% of GDP, compared to over 10% for Jamaica, Guyana and Barbados.
No country can continue expending scarce resources only for its most highly trained graduates to emigrate. The recent closure of the Petrotrin refinery and the idling of a significant part of the petrochemical sector have added pressure to the current labour environment. The Minister of Tertiary Education and Skills Training, Prakash Persad, has also highlighted the need to overhaul the higher education sector due to ballooning costs and a labour market that is saturated with graduates. The health minister in the former administration made a similar point regarding the number of graduating doctors.
The reality is that the economy has not diversified fast enough to absorb the volume of students graduating from state-funded tertiary programmes. Minister Persad has called for a systemic overhaul of the tertiary education framework, advocating deeper collaboration among local institutions, reducing duplicated services and pivoting toward industry-aligned, digital and technical skills training. Since the State is the largest funding agency in tertiary education, the biggest adjustment will be required for State-sponsored institutions and programmes.
Further, despite numerous promises from many administrations, no government has ever developed or fully implemented a comprehensive National Manpower Plan. One has been actively in development since late 2020 by the Ministry of Planning and Development in collaboration with UNICEF, but the public is not aware of how this is informing public policy development.
Last week, the UNESCO 2026 report raised structural and equity issues on the role of the Secondary Entrance Assessment (SEA) mechanism in T&T’s education system. It contains many sensible comments and suggestions. But there are broader systemic weaknesses in the Trinidad and Tobago education system that the Education Minister has identified and acknowledged. What are the next steps and what is the action plan?
