Orin Gordon
Iranians have a charming social custom called “taarof.” One is repeatedly offered something beyond measure and is expected to refuse. The social dance is insistence and eventual, reluctant acceptance. The culture is also evident when eating out with Iranians. One person would try to pay the whole bill and fend off (often physically) other diners who try to do the same.
Having already watched this several times and been the beneficiary of it, I once pretended to go to the bathroom, went to the cashier and settled the bill for the party of eight. I wouldn’t have been allowed to do it at the table, and fairness dictated that I had to do it then. They loved my manoeuvre. I became an honorary Persian that night.
When Venezuelan opposition leader and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Corina Machado first spoke of giving her medal to US President Donald Trump, he should have leaned in to the spirit of taarof (or basic self-awareness) and shut down the idea. Instead, Trump told one of his media advocates, Sean Hannity of Fox News, that the entire award should have been his, because he settled eight wars.
Analysis last month by CNN’s Jake Tapper showed the President’s claim to be untrue in every instance – from DR Congo and Rwanda, to Kosovo and Serbia. Trump deserves considerable credit for these peace efforts, but summoning principals to the table under the force of his undoubted charisma and unrivalled power is not enough to put an end to centuries-old ethnic and sectarian conflicts. A brief pause in fighting does not a settlement make. It’s akin to the young bachelor shoving the mess in his apartment under the bed, cabinets and into the wardrobe when his attractive date came over. You didn’t really clean house, James.
In Trump’s two electoral wins in 2016 and 2024, he played on the message that he favoured peace more than his two Democratic rivals, Hillary Clinton and Kamala Harris. In any event, he ended up bombing 10 countries – more than any other president in history, according to left-wing columnist Ben Norton.
The latest one in Venezuela to extract President Nicolas Maduro left between 80 and 100 people dead. To be fair to Trump, he has expressed regret for the loss of life among Venezuelans, even as he celebrated no American casualties among the forces that took part in the operation. Besides capturing Maduro and his wife, Cilia Flores, it included knocking out radar and power facilities and blowing up the headquarters of the military.
Trump’s wars all look a certain way. Brief strikes, usually aerial, at low to no cost in American lives, no boots on the ground if possible and no lasting presence – nothing that hints at Iraq-style “nation building” that he has spent an entire political career disdaining.
It’s why his administration made a strategic calculation that working with Delcy Rodriguez – Maduro’s deputy – was a better option than tying bundle with Machado. Rodriguez and all of the people in Venezuela’s governing apparatus were under US criminal sanction along with Maduro, but as Secretary of State Marco Rubio blurted out to CBS interviewer Margaret Brennan, taking out the entire government would have been too costly and bloody.
Team Trump spent a lot of time sizing up Machado in the last year, according to some excellent New York Times reporting, but was not convinced that she could keep things bolted down when the US forcibly removed Maduro. The problem for Machado is that everyone is talking about new elections as if it’s something far into the future. Her present to Trump, in which she framed the medal and wrote beautiful citations, is not going to change that calculus.
Trump had met at the White House the week before with the heads of major US oil companies – a room of Americans, mostly men, talking about what to do with Venezuela’s petroleum industry. He’s running Venezuela from Washington, openly giving orders to the interim president, seizing its oil shipments, and even raking in US $500m in payment for one consignment. Venezuela had no say in what happened to that revenue, which the US deposited in a bank in Qatar.
The optics are unhelpful. Trump won’t care.
The wider fallout from the US action in Venezuela
Venezuela has presented Donald Trump with historic opportunities to help shape change in two countries with long-settled political systems – Iran and Cuba.
As of Friday, protests in Iran had left about 2,500 people dead, according to the BBC. Things could change drastically by the time you read this. Some protest leaders spoke openly about seizing the moment after the US capture of Maduro. On the other hand, many hate the clerics but don’t want American intervention.
Last Friday, January 16, marked 47 years since the Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, flew his own Boeing 727 into exile. The Shah was pushed out of power by bloody demonstrations. In an ironic mirroring of current events, a significant section of the nation had largely grown tired of his corruption, repression and autocratic rule. Thousands took to the streets in bloody protest against his reign.
In the chaotic and traumatic turn of events, Islamic cleric and religious leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini returned from exile in France and effectively took power. Are we witnessing a historic loop?
The dangers of breaking Iran
I’ve written before of how, on my visit to Iran in 2008, Sara told me what Tehran felt like during the 1979 revolution.
“Sara, then a university student, had gone to a public protest against the king’s rule. She never forgot a protest organiser yelling at her to go to the women’s section in the crowd. That separation had never happened before. And the display of aggressive power left her cold. The revolution lost her at that moment.”
The US and Israel have shown that they have the intelligence capability to militarily hit Iran’s religious leadership, although Trump seemed, as of Friday, to be hesitating to make such a call.
Iran is much more topographically, geographically and ethnically complex than Venezuela and almost twice as big. The north around Azerbaijan and Caspian Sea countries is different to Arab-flavoured Hormozgan in the south/Persian Gulf, and Sistan and Baluchestan province, which abuts Pakistan and Afghanistan. Iran’s got desert, wine country (Shiraz is a place there) and snow-covered mountains with skiing.
Countries with this much difference are often complicated constructs. Break them, and you unleash uncontrollable sectarian forces. Venezuela was itself a limited intervention that left most of the government in place. Trump prefers low-cost wars. The bet has to be against him breaking Iran.
Cuba
We’ve romanticised Cuba, Fidel Castro and Che Guevara to death. We want picture postcard holidays amid 1950s cars that are there by necessity rather than choice. The collective failure to usher Cuba towards a system of local and national democratic governance in 67 years is a glaring one by Cuba’s friends, neighbours and allies in the hemisphere.
Caribbean and Latin American groups have correctly called out the longstanding US embargo and its devastating effect on Cuba, but they’ve allowed Cuba to use it as a shield against making necessary reforms. The chief driver of US policy on Cuba is the son of conservative Cuban exiles, who have been accused of being more intent on reclaiming what they lost in 1959 than seeing Cubans truly equal.
Even President Obama, in the last year of his presidency, seemed to choose a photo op and symbolism over pressure on Havana for real democratic reform. Trump now controls Cuba’s oil supply. And in Rubio, he has a Secretary of State who started creating distance between Cuba and Caricom countries from Day One. In Cuba, Trump has the capacity to deliver one of the hemisphere’s most consequential political shifts in 60 years.
Orin Gordon has visited and/or reported from Iran, Cuba and Little Havana in Miami.
