Two days ago, the Speaker of the Philippine Parliament, Martin Romualdez - cousin to President Ferdinand Marcos Jr - resigned amid a corruption scandal involving alleged kickbacks from flood control contracts. Investigations revealed widespread irregularities: ghost infrastructure, defective public works, and padded contracts.
For Filipinos, this scandal is just the latest chapter in a long, frustrating story of broken promises.
When Ferdinand Marcos Sr was ousted in 1986 after the People Power Revolution, the Philippines became a global symbol of democratic renewal. The dictatorship was overthrown peacefully. A new constitution was written. Democratic institutions were restored.
But nearly four decades later, the son of that same dictator is in power, and corruption remains deeply entrenched.
So, what went wrong — and why should Trinidad and Tobago pay attention?
After Marcos Sr’s exile, President Corazon Aquino - the widow of assassinated opposition leader Ninoy Aquino -took office amid high public expectations. She stood for democracy and reform.
She learned the hard way that despite good intentions, her government, like many that followed, struggled to dismantle an entrenched system built on patronage, weak institutions, and elite interests.
Each new president — from Ramos and Estrada to Arroyo, Aquino III, and Duterte — rode waves of hope but ultimately left in disillusionment. Campaigns promised reform; administrations delivered scandal.
Ferdinand Marcos Jr capitalised on that disillusionment in 2022. With a savvy mix of social media outreach, historical revisionism, and voter fatigue with the political elite, he won the presidency.
But now, with his own cousin resigning amid corruption allegations, the cycle of hope and betrayal continues. Public protests are once again planned in Manila. The headlines are familiar — and they should feel familiar to us here in Trinidad and Tobago.
We, too, face a cycle of corruption allegations, political blame games, and voter frustration. Ghost gangs, inflated contracts, nepotism in government awards, unexplained rentals, and substandard public works are now almost routine.
The similarities between our two nations are striking. In both cases:
• ↓Corruption is systemic, not incidental.
• ↓Oversight institutions are thought to be politicised or under-resourced.
• ↓Whistleblowers lack adequate protection.
• ↓Voters oscillate between hope and resignation.
And in both countries, political party networks remain powerful, while citizens are often left wondering whether meaningful change is even possible.
But it is - if we focus less on personalities and more on systems.
What can T&T learn from the Philippine experience?
1. Fix the institutions, not just the politics. Agencies like the Integrity Commission, Procurement Regulator, Auditor General, and Civil Service Commission must be strengthened, insulated from political interference, and given real authority.
2. Make government spending transparent. Digitise procurement. Publicise contracts. Let citizens track projects and budgets in real time. Corruption thrives in the shadows.
3. Protect whistleblowers.
Enact strong legal frameworks that protect those who expose wrongdoing.
4. Break the culture of impunity. Investigations must lead to prosecutions. Justice delayed is not just denied - it signals that the powerful are untouchable.
5. Engage citizens beyond elections. Voting every five years is not enough. Civil society, media, and everyday citizens must stay vigilant, ask questions, and demand answers year-round.
6. Challenge political tribalism. Voters must stop defending wrongdoing just because it comes from “their” side. Corruption is wrong - regardless of which party is in power.
The real danger isn’t corruption alone - it’s the normalisation of corruption. When people begin to accept it as “just how the system works,” reform becomes impossible, and the corrupt grow bolder.
The Philippines shows us what happens when institutions are eroded and public outrage fails to translate into structural reform: the same problems return, often with the same names and faces.
Trinidad and Tobago still has a chance to break that cycle. But only if we stop pretending that elections alone will save us.
Real change requires more than new leaders - it demands better systems, stronger oversight, and a citizenry that refuses to settle for less.
We are at a crossroads. Will we keep repeating the same mistakes, or finally be able to chart a different future?