JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, July 6, 2025

T&T must deal with food security

by

23 days ago
20250613

The COVID-19 pan­dem­ic, with its dis­rup­tion of glob­al sup­ply chains, should have opened our eyes to our pre­car­i­ous de­pen­dence on the out­side world. While we proud­ly pro­claim our­selves a re­pub­lic, we can­not feed our­selves.

As far back as 1988, the late Mor­gan Job—for­mer par­lia­men­tar­i­an, econ­o­mist, writer, and ra­dio per­son­al­i­ty—warned, “All they care about is pan. I want to see if their sup­port­ers would eat pan when we have no food.”

Job was a per­sis­tent crit­ic of the gov­ern­ment’s fail­ure to de­vel­op agri­cul­ture and re­duce our de­pen­dence on im­port­ed food. Thir­ty-five years and mul­ti­ple regime changes lat­er, it seems not much has changed.

On Sep­tem­ber 1st, 2024, Agri­cul­tur­al So­ci­ety of T&T di­rec­tor Don­ny Rogers said by now, the coun­try should have sig­nif­i­cant­ly re­duced its re­liance on im­port­ed fresh pro­duce. He stressed the need for a “will­ful and co­he­sive ap­proach to agri­cul­ture,” al­low­ing the pop­u­la­tion to eat health­i­er with­out break­ing the bank.

Then, on No­vem­ber 5, 2024, let­ter con­trib­u­tor Gor­don Laugh­lin wrote: “Agri­cul­ture in T&T is fac­ing a crit­i­cal cri­sis, marked by the small­est bud­get al­lo­ca­tion in re­cent years. This lack of in­vest­ment in the agri­cul­tur­al sec­tor pos­es a sig­nif­i­cant threat to food se­cu­ri­ty, as the coun­try in­creas­ing­ly re­lies on im­ports to meet its ba­sic food needs.”

T&T has the ca­pac­i­ty to feed its pop­u­la­tion. We have arable land, wa­ter, lo­cal­ly pro­duced fer­tilis­ers, and ac­cess to af­ford­able fu­el. Yet, our an­nu­al food im­port bill hov­ers around $5 bil­lion.

In March 2024, the web­site of the In­ter­na­tion­al Trade Ad­min­is­tra­tion re­port­ed: “With US ex­ports to­talling $450.2 mil­lion in 2022—a 22 per cent in­crease from the pre­vi­ous year—T&T is the sec­ond-largest mar­ket in the Eng­lish-speak­ing Caribbean for US agri­cul­tur­al ex­ports. The coun­try is heav­i­ly de­pen­dent on food im­ports, with rough­ly 40 per cent orig­i­nat­ing from the Unit­ed States.”

The adage, “When Amer­i­ca sneezes, the world catch­es a cold,” may soon haunt us. Just nine days ago, FBI di­rec­tor Kash Pa­tel an­nounced the ar­rest of two Chi­nese na­tion­als ac­cused of smug­gling a po­ten­tial agroter­ror­ism weapon in­to the US: the nox­ious fun­gus Fusar­i­um gramin­earum.

Had this fun­gus suc­ceed­ed in tar­get­ing the US agri­cul­tur­al sec­tor, not on­ly the US—but by ex­ten­sion, T&T—would have faced dev­as­tat­ing con­se­quences.

In this un­cer­tain glob­al cli­mate, it is im­per­a­tive T&T re­duce its over­re­liance on im­port­ed food.

This is not with­out prece­dent. Dur­ing World War II, Japan de­ployed rice blast fun­gus spores to dam­age Chi­nese rice crops. Both the US and the USSR de­vel­oped an­ti-crop bi­o­log­i­cal weapons but even­tu­al­ly agreed to cease such pro­grammes un­der the Bi­o­log­i­cal Weapons Con­ven­tion in 1972. In 2002, a group in Britain at­tempt­ed to in­tro­duce foot-and-mouth dis­ease in­to the US.

Ad­vances in ge­net­ic en­gi­neer­ing have made bi­o­log­i­cal threats more in­sid­i­ous. Sci­en­tists can now mod­i­fy plant and pest DNA, cre­at­ing new tox­ins that by­pass nat­ur­al plant im­mu­ni­ty. Crops can be ge­net­i­cal­ly al­tered to be­come vul­ner­a­ble to com­mon pests, or even en­gi­neered with “sui­cide genes” that ac­ti­vate un­der spe­cif­ic con­di­tions.

Chi­na is cur­rent­ly the world’s largest pro­duc­er of agri­cul­tur­al com­modi­ties such as rice, wheat, corn, pota­toes, soy­beans, and cot­ton. If the US agri­cul­tur­al sec­tor were se­vere­ly dam­aged—whether through war­fare, eco­nom­ic con­flict, or agroter­ror­ism—it would al­ter the glob­al bal­ance of pow­er, in­clud­ing Trump-era tar­iff dy­nam­ics.

Lo­cal­ly, while farm­ers have been of­fered sub­sidised loans and ac­cess to agri­cul­tur­al in­cen­tive pro­grammes, many re­port chal­lenges in qual­i­fy­ing for these ben­e­fits.

A ma­jor ob­sta­cle is the re­quire­ment for land tenure to ac­cess sup­port. Ap­prox­i­mate­ly 65 per cent of T&T farm­ers lack se­cure tenure. This cri­te­ri­on may need to be re­con­sid­ered. Al­ter­na­tives could in­clude eval­u­at­ing ap­pli­cants based on years of cul­ti­va­tion or crop pro­duc­tion his­to­ry.

Labour al­so re­mains a chal­lenge. The Gov­ern­ment could con­sid­er mo­bil­is­ing CEPEP work­ers or mi­grant labour to sup­port agri­cul­tur­al pro­duc­tion. While we may not be able to com­pete with the cost of im­port­ed pro­duce from met­ro­pol­i­tan coun­tries, in times of glob­al un­cer­tain­ty, food se­cu­ri­ty must be pri­ori­tised—even if on­ly for lo­cal con­sump­tion.

T&T stands at a cross­roads. Our con­tin­ued de­pen­dence on im­port­ed food is no longer just an eco­nom­ic is­sue—it is a na­tion­al se­cu­ri­ty risk.

We must act now to en­sure our peo­ple can feed them­selves in a rapid­ly chang­ing and in­creas­ing­ly un­sta­ble world.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored