JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, July 10, 2025

T&T’s $12 billion annual health bill headache

by

Joel Julien
1365 days ago
20211014

Every month al­most $1 bil­lion is spent on health­care in T&T. The gov­ern­ment spends about half of that and pri­vate cit­i­zens, in­sur­ance com­pa­nies and the bur­geon­ing pri­vate health­care sec­tor spends the rest.

“We spend about $11 to $12 bil­lion on health an­nu­al­ly,” Dr Hen­ry Bai­ley, a lec­tur­er at the De­part­ment of Eco­nom­ics at the Uni­ver­si­ty of the West In­dies, St Au­gus­tine told the Busi­ness Guardian.

Ac­cord­ing to the lat­est da­ta from the World Bank, T&T spends about US$1,123 per per­son on health­care in this coun­try on an an­nu­al ba­sis.

We, there­fore, spend around US$12 more than the glob­al av­er­age of US$1,111. This glob­al av­er­age in­cludes the wealth­i­est and poor­est coun­tries.

To put it in­to per­spec­tive T&T spends 80 per cent more per per­son on health­care an­nu­al­ly than the US$621 av­er­age for the Eng­lish Speak­ing Caribbean.

“About half of the spend­ing on health­care in T&T is spent by the gov­ern­ment and the oth­er half is out of pock­et, it is pri­vate or through pri­vate in­sur­ance,” Bai­ley ex­plained.

He said peo­ple must re­alise that no gov­ern­ment can pro­vide all health­care for all of its cit­i­zens, a mis­con­cep­tion he has to cor­rect reg­u­lar­ly.

“If you ac­cept that no coun­try can pro­vide all health­care for all of its cit­i­zens then choic­es have to be made and there are some things that we are not go­ing to be able to do,” Bai­ley said.

“And this is why every coun­try in the world com­plains about this. Every coun­try in the world grap­ples with this prob­lem. There is al­ways so much that we can’t do for peo­ple be­cause health is like a bot­tom­less pit,” he ar­gued.

Bai­ley said there are a num­ber of peo­ple in the Unit­ed States who do not have any ac­cess, what­so­ev­er, to any health­care.

“It is pret­ty scary when you look at health­care and health out­comes in some of these de­vel­oped coun­tries,” he said.

And as such Bai­ley in­sist­ed the pri­vate sec­tor has a role to play.

“The oth­er mis­con­cep­tion that looms large for me is the idea that there is no room for prof­it or the pri­vate sec­tor in health­care. That is some­thing I come across all the time as well....The fact is that if there are some things that the pri­vate health­care sys­tem can do bet­ter and cheap­er than the gov­ern­ment then it might make sense for the gov­ern­ment to not pro­vide this di­rect­ly just out­source it to the pri­vate sec­tor and fund it, reg­u­late it and mon­i­tor it,” he said.

“If you can show that a pri­vate hos­pi­tal has bet­ter out­comes for open-heart surgery and can do open-heart surgery cheap­er than the gov­ern­ment and make a prof­it, then why not let the gov­ern­ment pro­vide through the pri­vate sec­tor,” he said.

Bai­ley said in this type of sit­u­a­tion it would be bet­ter for every­body in­clud­ing the pa­tient if the gov­ern­ment out­sourced to the pri­vate hos­pi­tal.

“We have had many of those arrange­ments in play and we still have many of those arrange­ments in play to­day and I think we need to be do­ing more of that,” he said.

“I do get peo­ple all the time say­ing that health is a fun­da­men­tal hu­man right and there is no way any­body should be mak­ing a prof­it on health­care and so on and so forth but I think there are many ways that we can bring the pri­vate sec­tor in­to health­care and cre­ate a win-win-win sit­u­a­tion for every­body,” Bai­ley told the Busi­ness Guardian.

To help an­swer the prob­lem of how to al­lo­cate the health sec­tor’s scarce re­sources is why the Health Eco­nom­ics Unit (HEU) was es­tab­lished in 1995, as one of the re­search clus­ters in the De­part­ment of Eco­nom­ics at The Uni­ver­si­ty of the West In­dies, St Au­gus­tine.

“The HEU staff is re­spon­si­ble for re­search, train­ing and project-re­lat­ed ac­tiv­i­ties in health eco­nom­ics and re­lat­ed ar­eas, in­clud­ing so­cial in­sur­ance, pover­ty, health and sus­tain­able de­vel­op­ment, eq­ui­ty, health pol­i­cy and man­age­ment. In 2008, the HEU was grant­ed the sta­tus of a se­mi-au­tonomous cen­tre with­in the Uni­ver­si­ty. Its name was sub­se­quent­ly changed to the HEU, Cen­tre for Health Eco­nom­ics to re­flect this change,” its web­site states.

“Health eco­nom­ics is re­al­ly the an­a­lyt­i­cal tools, the meth­ods of eco­nom­ics, the way of look­ing at prob­lems ap­plied to prob­lems in health­care,” Bai­ley said.

Bai­ley said ac­cord­ing to Mor­ris, De­vlin Parkin and Spencer (2012) health eco­nom­ics is de­fined as the ap­pli­ca­tion of eco­nom­ic the­o­ry, mod­els and em­pir­i­cal tech­niques to the analy­sis of de­ci­sion-mak­ing by in­di­vid­u­als, health care providers and gov­ern­ments with re­spect to health and health­care.

He said it has be­come a ma­jor branch of eco­nom­ics in the past 30 years.

“It is im­por­tant be­cause scarci­ty abounds in health­care,” Bai­ley said.

Bai­ley not­ed that what we do in health­care is cre­ate a de­mand for more health­care.

“If some­body in your of­fice col­laps­es with a heart at­tack to­day you can take them to Med­corp or Mt Hope or some­where where there is a Cath Lab, we will give them an an­gio­plas­ty and in a few weeks, they will be up and about again. But are they go­ing to live for­ev­er? And the an­swer is no. What we are do­ing is cre­at­ing to­mor­row’s pa­tient, that per­son if they con­tin­ue to live they are even­tu­al­ly go­ing to get can­cer or some oth­er very ex­pen­sive ill­ness and come back in­to the health sys­tem,” he said,

“The way this thing works is as we get bet­ter and bet­ter at treat­ing ill­ness, all we are do­ing is de­fer­ring the de­mand that these same peo­ple keep com­ing back in­to the sys­tem for more care,” Bai­ley said.

Bai­ley said some econ­o­mists point to the link be­tween the health of the pop­u­la­tion and the well-be­ing of the pop­u­la­tion and the amount of eco­nom­ic out­put.

“You can see us as a set of tech­nocrats whose job it is to sup­port pol­i­cy-mak­ers with tools to make de­ci­sions. We don’t ac­tu­al­ly make de­ci­sions. We don’t say ‘well open this hos­pi­tal or do that,’ but what we can do is we can do the math­e­mat­ics for you. And we can give you the tools that you can then use to make these de­ci­sions.”

When Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert pre­sent­ed this year’s $52.4 bil­lion na­tion­al Bud­get he al­lo­cat­ed $6.395 to health. Health’s al­lo­ca­tion this year was sec­ond on­ly to the $6.886 al­lo­cat­ed to ed­u­ca­tion.

Asked what he would do if he was giv­en the $6.395 bil­lion bud­get al­lo­ca­tion to im­prove health­care, Bai­ley said:

“I am not a pol­i­cy-mak­er and I recog­nise the Min­istry of Health is fac­ing a tremen­dous task to pro­vide health­care to this pop­u­la­tion with in­creas­ing fis­cal pres­sure.
Con­tin­ued on Page BG5

We are in the mid­dle of a pan­dem­ic and there is al­ways so much that does not get done,” he said.

“How­ev­er, if I were in charge of the bud­get, I would redi­rect some of the spend­ing that is not cur­rent­ly aimed di­rect­ly at pro­vid­ing health­care to build­ing ca­pac­i­ty in the eco­nom­ic analy­sis that un­der­pins (or should un­der­pin) de­ci­sion mak­ing.”

But how healthy is T&T’s pop­u­la­tion?

Bai­ley said the idea of mea­sur­ing how healthy a pop­u­la­tion is a rel­a­tive­ly new one and it is “ex­treme­ly prob­lem­at­ic.”

“The ide­al thing would be one num­ber that I can tell you that would have so much mean­ing as it would be re­al­ly use­ful if we had this, but it is prob­lem­at­ic be­cause health has so many di­men­sions,” he said.

Bai­ley told BG there are many in­dices that at­tempt to do this in­clud­ing us­ing life ex­pectan­cy, but they all have short­com­ings.

“The UNDP and oth­er or­gan­i­sa­tions give us our rank­ing vs oth­er coun­tries. We have mixed re­sults com­pared to oth­er coun­tries. We are nei­ther par­tic­u­lar­ly good nor par­tic­u­lar­ly bad,” he said.

“It’s like a pi­lot in an aero­plane that has many many di­als or many in­di­ca­tors telling him or her the sta­tus of many things and that is kind of where we are with this. So some­body with a point to make can pick and choose their in­di­ca­tors and cre­ate a sto­ry,” he said.

Bai­ley said when you look at life ex­pectan­cy in T&T the lat­est UNDP re­port puts us at about 73.5 which is high­er than the world av­er­age (72.8) but be­low the av­er­age for Latin Amer­i­ca (75.6).

“How do we in­ter­pret that? You need a lot more in­for­ma­tion to get a sense of healthy we are,” he said.

Bai­ley said when you look at the more spe­cif­ic mea­sures in the UNDP doc­u­ment we have made “great gains” on ma­ter­nal mor­tal­i­ty now down to 67 death per 100,000 live births.

“World­wide the fig­ure is 204 so we are way down com­pared to oth­er coun­tries but then Latin Amer­i­ca is al­so high­er than T&T. So how do we in­ter­pret that,” he said.

Bai­ley said around one in eight adults in T&T suf­fer from di­a­betes while glob­al­ly the fig­ure is clos­er to one in 12.

“So in that re­gard, we are not very well we have a long way to go,” he said.

In 2012 a study was done to de­ter­mine the health sta­tus of the pop­u­la­tion.

“Com­pared to oth­er coun­tries we are not sen­sa­tion­al­ly dif­fer­ent,” he said. The study is to be re­peat­ed next year.

Bai­ley al­so laud­ed Prof Karl Theodore for his decades work with health eco­nom­ics both in T&T and re­gion­al­ly.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored