JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, July 11, 2025

BG View: Stop blaming everyone else - Time to transform the economy

by

Curtis Williams
1380 days ago
20210929
Minister of Finance, Colm Imbert MP.

Minister of Finance, Colm Imbert MP.

Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert is set to present to 2022 bud­get in the next few days which will seek to do the im­pos­si­ble, that of a tight con­trol on ex­pen­di­ture while at the same time try­ing to tru­ly be­gin the trans­for­ma­tion of the coun­try’s econ­o­my.

In some ways Min­is­ter Im­bert is be­ing asked to car­ry a bur­den that should not be his to bear, as the role of eco­nom­ic trans­for­ma­tion is for the en­tire Cab­i­net with the Min­is­ter of Plan­ning co­or­di­nat­ing if not lead­ing the charge.

As the late Lloyd Best of­ten re­mind­ed us, the Min­is­ter of Fi­nance is more of an ac­coun­tant/book keep­er whose job it is to bal­ance the books by look­ing at is­sues of rev­enue and ex­pen­di­ture.

If we take that in­to ac­count that Mr Im­bert’s task gets a lit­tle clear­er and eas­i­er. He has to do a few things in his bud­get on Mon­day.

The first thing is he has to ac­count for the per­for­mance of the econ­o­my over the last year. Since the days of Lar­ry Howai there ap­pears to be a re­luc­tance to ac­count for the per­for­mance of the econ­o­my in the pre­ced­ing year, an ac­count of where we failed, where we suc­ceed­ed and there­fore we avoid the usu­al re­hash of projects that nev­er ac­tu­al­ly come to fruition.

Im­bert must lay out a clear and com­pelling ar­gu­ment for the state of the econ­o­my and how he in­tends to fi­nance the fis­cal mea­sures that he plans to im­ple­ment.

I am sure the Min­is­ter will blame the chal­lenges we are fac­ing square­ly on the on­go­ing pan­dem­ic but he must be warned that the pop­u­la­tion will see straight through such ver­bose.

Of course the black swan event called the Covid-19 pan­dem­ic has had a dele­te­ri­ous ef­fect on the econ­o­my.

The shut­ting down of many sec­tors, the re­sult­ing un­em­ploy­ment and loss of rev­enue, the lack of cer­tain­ty that is so im­por­tant for in­vest­ing and the need to in­crease ex­pen­di­ture in health care and with rev­enues down and ex­pen­di­ture in­creased in some ar­eas there is no doubt that the coun­try had to in­crease its bor­row­ing and there­fore its debt to GDP ra­tio.

But the Min­is­ter of Fi­nance and more­so the Kei­th Row­ley ad­min­is­tra­tion can­not get away from com­plete­ly mis­han­dling the econ­o­my from 2015 to 2020 while all the time kick­ing and scream­ing that it is the Op­po­si­tion Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress to blame.

It is anal­o­gous to be­ing in a mar­riage with one par­ty blam­ing the chal­lenges they are fac­ing on what hap­pened with the ex.

There is no doubt that the UNC left the coun­try ex­posed, they con­tin­ued and has­tened the spend­ing of the wind­fall re­ceived from the en­er­gy sec­tor while not do­ing enough to en­sure the very sec­tor’s sus­te­nance.

The Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar ad­min­is­tra­tion mis­man­aged many of the State en­ter­pris­es and the stench of cor­rup­tion per­vad­ed gov­er­nance and gov­ern­ment. But that was al­most sev­en years ago and to have blamed the UNC for our predica­ment for five years was a waste of time and a clas­sic case of de­flec­tion from the gov­ern­ment’s own fail­ings.

The mis­read­ing of the woes of the en­er­gy sec­tor is the rea­son the Fi­nance Min­is­ter in a high-priced en­er­gy en­vi­ron­ment can­not come to the coun­try and talk about a wind­fall from the en­er­gy sec­tor this year.

In case we have not been fol­low­ing the in­ter­na­tion­al en­er­gy sit­u­a­tion close­ly, crude prices have for the first nine months of the fi­nan­cial year av­er­age US $58 a bar­rel and nat­ur­al gas prices and petro­chem­i­cal prices are the strongest they have been in years. Yes this is a rel­a­tive­ly high priced en­vi­ron­ment.

Where we are fail­ing is in our pro­duc­tion pro­file.

The Gov­ern­ment says the right things but seem to suf­fer from paral­y­sis analy­sis, can­not im­ple­ment the nec­es­sary mea­sures. For six years it has had one failed near-shore bid round.

It has promised three bid rounds and the Min­is­ter of En­er­gy/Min­is­ter of Every­thing, Stu­art Young has failed to de­liv­er just as his pre­de­ces­sor, the late Franklin Khan.

In­stead what we have seen is a gov­ern­ment pre­oc­cu­pied with try­ing to bro­ker a deal on At­lantic LNG Train 1 with no gas avail­able to it and try­ing to blame every­one but them­selves for throw­ing away half a bil­lion dol­lars on that and an­oth­er ill fat­ed NGC project.

In case Mr Im­bert is pre­pared to lis­ten, I want to sug­gest that as a mat­ter of pri­or­i­ty the Gov­ern­ment should work close­ly with the multi­na­tion­als to in­crease oil and gas pro­duc­tion and get the three bid rounds go­ing.

I have it from good sources that all the tech­ni­cal work is done for the bid rounds and its the po­lit­i­cal di­rec­torate that is keep­ing back the process. Do your jobs please!

On the is­sue of the debt, I take the ar­gu­ment es­poused by the likes of Mary King that one way to deal with it is to get growth lev­els high­er that the cost of cap­i­tal.

That is to say if GDP is grow­ing by 6 per cent and you are bor­row­ing at 5 per cent you are fine. The chal­lenge is the struc­ture of the econ­o­my is such that those growth rates are un­like­ly if you do not have a sta­ble econ­o­my.

In any case the prob­lem this coun­try has is far more on the ex­pen­di­ture side of the econ­o­my and less so on the rev­enue side.

Dur­ing the 1994/2014 pe­ri­od we were able to mask a lot of the in­ef­fi­cient spend­ing based on rev­enue in­flows. It meant rather than us­ing the ex­tra mon­ey to fi­nal­ly fix flood­ing in Port-of-Spain or re­do the en­tire WASA sys­tem we spent it on cor­rup­tion, on trans­fers and sub­si­dies to non-per­form­ing state en­ter­pris­es and poor­ly-tar­get­ed make work and pover­ty re­duc­tion schemes.

Min­is­ter, if I were you I would have every Min­istry do an au­dit of its spend­ing pat­terns and de­ter­mine if we are get­ting val­ue for mon­ey and what we have to do to make it more ef­fi­cient.

Let me give you a sim­ple ex­am­ple. We pay $300 for a re­turn flight to To­ba­go. Can any­one who is rea­son­able not ac­cept that the break-even fare that we un­der­stand is $500 should be paid? What is the rea­son we are not pre­pared to have peo­ple pay the eco­nom­ic price of a tick­et be­tween Trinidad and To­ba­go or even $100 on the fer­ry for a re­turn tick­et?

An air­line is not a maxi taxi ride. There are costs and we must be pre­pared to live with­in our means.

The need to get the ex­pen­di­ture side right does not negate the need for mea­sures like the re­turn of the prop­er­ty tax or the Rev­enue Au­thor­i­ty. But even in do­ing this it can­not be just the col­lec­tion of ad­di­tion­al rev­enue.

We have to get a clear leg­isla­tive com­mit­ment about how these rev­enues are to be spent in lo­cal gov­ern­ment or we end up hav­ing even more dis­trust in gov­ern­ment and tax­a­tion.

A lot has been said about the per­for­mance of the pub­lic ser­vice and we all know it is bloat­ed, that we need to re­duce the size but that it is not a num­bers game it is about re-imag­ing how a pub­lic ser­vice should serve our needs with high qual­i­ty, well trained and well com­pen­sat­ed in­di­vid­u­als.

Mr Im­bert, your task is not easy and you will get the blame for all the woes in this econ­o­my. But where is the Prime Min­is­ter in all of this and where is his Plan­ning Min­is­ter?

I will say though the Tourism Min­is­ter seems to be mak­ing some pos­i­tive moves and we are be­gin­ning to see the first fruit of the work of the Min­is­ter of Agri­cul­ture while the Trade and Works Min­is­ters re­mains ac­tive.

Maybe the rest will join­ing in the hard work.

Cur­tis Williams is ful­ly vac­ci­nat­ed and await­ing the open­ing of the safe zones.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored