Andrea Perez-Sobers
In a development that is being carefully monitored in Port-of-Spain, Shell is reportedly assessing the possibility of a potential acquisition of BP, Bloomberg reported yesterday, citing people familiar with the matter.
Shell is monitoring stock and oil price trends before making a move.
The decision to proceed depends on BP's declining stock value.
For years, both the oil and gas giants have been comparable in size, but recently Shell has surged ahead, now boasting a market value of approximately US$197.7 billion, nearly double that of BP.
Amidst this backdrop, Shell CEO Wael Sawan expressed a preference for stock repurchases over acquisitions in a statement to the Financial Times, while also noting the importance of having "our own house in order" during an earnings call.
A potential merger would bolster Shell's position in the global energy market, rivalling US counterparts Exxon and Chevron.
A Shell spokesperson said when asked about the report: "As we have said many times before we are sharply focused on capturing the value in Shell through continuing to focus on performance, discipline, and simplification.”
On the other side, BP is facing its challenges. The company's CEO, Murray Auchincloss, has outlined a strategy to divest US$20 billion in assets by 2027, alongside reduced spending and share buybacks, to bolster profitability and investor confidence.
This comes as activist investor Elliott Investment Management, which has recently increased its BP stake to over five per cent, is pushing for a strategic overhaul to enhance free cash flow by further cutting costs.
Tony Paul: What is Shell's interest
Local energy expert Anthony Paul told Guardian Media that while the talk of Shell acquiring BP has been hinted at for some time, companies always assess their competitors, in terms of strategies, strengths, and weaknesses.
The companies, he said, always look at opportunities for growth, and in looking at opportunities for growth, looking at where they can get value.
“Sometimes, it looks at where they can adjust their portfolio, either in terms of increasing reserves, increasing production, changing geographic focus, changing product focus, meaning oil or gas.”
In giving an example, Paul said when BP bought Amoco, it was because they wanted to get more gas in their portfolio. Amoco's biggest gas growth area was Trinidad, so Trinidad was a strong strategic interest.
He indicated that if Shell were to acquire BP, the question is, one, what is Shell's interest? And two, why would BP want to sell?
However, Paul pointed to BP's share price which has dropped tremendously below the market.
“You may have seen that BP's production has declined, but BP is only one of the majors whose reserves replacement has been negative. In other words, they've been losing reserves, producing more than they're putting back together.”
“Now, Shell and BP, over the last few years, have made a lot of money, a lot more than the market expected, through trading, meaning selling products. A high proportion of that came from Trinidad, because in Trinidad, fiscal models don't capture the value from trading. So, in that respect, Trinidad has an impact on Shell's online, in terms of BP, interest,” Paul explained.
He said BP has something in Trinidad that Shell does not.
“BP has reserves potential in the acreage they hold. Shell does not have much of it.
On the other hand, Paul said Shell's track record in T&T, mostly BG its predecessor, has been very poor at finding oil and gas. If Shell were to acquire BP from a T&T perspective, Shell's interest would be not only in the reserves but also in the processes BP used.
“Shell has some of that information, but not all of it. That would be Shell's interest in Trinidad. Of course, it will give them the monopoly position, almost, in the Atlantic. And that is a key asset for them, both in terms of the regional markets for LNG, Latin America, in their global trading portfolio, and in terms of potential growth for Venezuela gas to be liquefied,” he added. (with Yahoo Finance)