JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, August 27, 2025

Dig­i­tal De­pen­den­cy:

The hidden trade imbalance reshaping global power

by

Prof Justin Robinson
48 days ago
20250710

Cana­da abrupt­ly can­celled its dig­i­tal ser­vices tax less than 24 hours be­fore col­lect­ing US$2 bil­lion from tech gi­ants. The trig­ger wasn’t Sil­i­con Val­ley lob­by­ing—it was Pres­i­dent Trump’s threat to sus­pend trade ne­go­ti­a­tions, call­ing the tax “an at­tack on Amer­i­ca.”

While this ca­pit­u­la­tion is in the area of tax sov­er­eign­ty, it il­lus­trates the lever­age the USA has when its will­ing to weaponise trade and should alert the world to a stark re­al­i­ty: dig­i­tal de­pen­dence on the USA and how dig­i­tal in­fra­struc­ture can be­come a lever of eco­nom­ic co­er­cion that ex­tends far be­yond tra­di­tion­al trade re­la­tion­ships.

While glob­al de­bates fo­cus on Chi­na’s trade dom­i­nance, there’s been lit­tle scruti­ny of Amer­i­ca’s dig­i­tal hege­mo­ny. Five US com­pa­nies—Google, Ama­zon, Meta, Ap­ple, and Mi­crosoft—con­trol the world’s dig­i­tal in­fra­struc­ture. Google process­es 90 per cent of glob­al search­es. Ap­ple and Google’s app stores de­ter­mine which ser­vices reach smart­phones world­wide. Meta con­nects three bil­lion users dai­ly.

This con­cen­tra­tion means bil­lions of peo­ple, busi­ness­es, and gov­ern­ments de­pend on Amer­i­can-con­trolled plat­forms for com­mu­ni­ca­tion, com­merce, da­ta stor­age, and es­sen­tial ser­vices. Yet while “dom­i­nance of and de­pen­dence on Chi­na” in sup­ply chains sparks con­stant de­bate, sim­i­lar “dom­i­nance of and de­pen­dence on USA tech” is ac­cept­ed as nat­ur­al.

Dig­i­tal plat­forms func­tion as crit­i­cal in­fra­struc­ture but re­main un­der pri­vate con­trol aligned with spe­cif­ic na­tion­al in­ter­ests. Re­cent ex­am­ples show how this cre­ates lever­age:

* Con­nec­tiv­i­ty con­trol: Elon Musk’s Star­link de­ci­sions af­fect­ed Ukraine’s mil­i­tary com­mu­ni­ca­tions;

* App-store pow­er: Re­mov­ing ap­pli­ca­tions can elim­i­nate ser­vices from en­tire pop­u­la­tions;

* Pay­ment Sys­tems: Dig­i­tal proces­sors can iso­late coun­tries eco­nom­i­cal­ly

* Bor­der Con­trol: For­eign stu­dents seek­ing US visas may face so­cial me­dia search­es—a dig­i­tal strip search

This dig­i­tal con­cen­tra­tion rais­es fun­da­men­tal ques­tions about eco­nom­ic au­ton­o­my. When es­sen­tial func­tions de­pend on for­eign-con­trolled plat­forms, tra­di­tion­al con­cepts of in­de­pen­dence re­quire re-ex­am­i­na­tion.

Dig­i­tal in­fra­struc­ture can be mod­i­fied or weaponised much faster than phys­i­cal in­fra­struc­ture, cre­at­ing new dy­nam­ics in in­ter­na­tion­al re­la­tions. The is­sue ex­tends be­yond mar­ket com­pe­ti­tion to ques­tions about who con­trols the in­fra­struc­ture en­abling mod­ern eco­nom­ic ac­tiv­i­ty.

* Chi­na rep­re­sents the most com­pre­hen­sive ex­am­ple of dig­i­tal sov­er­eign­ty, hav­ing de­vel­oped do­mes­tic al­ter­na­tives across vir­tu­al­ly every ma­jor plat­form cat­e­go­ry:

* Search: Baidu dom­i­nates with over 70 per cent mar­ket share in Chi­na;

* So­cial me­dia: WeChat (Ten­cent) com­bines mes­sag­ing, pay­ments, e-com­merce, and gov­ern­ment ser­vices for over 1.3 bil­lion users;

* E-com­merce: Al­iba­ba’s Taobao and Tmall plat­forms han­dle more trans­ac­tions than Ama­zon glob­al­ly;

* Pay­ments: Ali­pay and WeChat Pay process the ma­jor­i­ty of Chi­na’s dig­i­tal trans­ac­tions;

* Video: Douyin (Tik­Tok’s Chi­nese ver­sion) and oth­er do­mes­tic plat­forms dom­i­nate en­ter­tain­ment; and

* Cloud Ser­vices: Al­iba­ba Cloud, Ten­cent Cloud, and Baidu Cloud serve the mas­sive Chi­nese mar­ket.

Chi­na’s ap­proach demon­strates that com­pre­hen­sive dig­i­tal sov­er­eign­ty is pos­si­ble, but it re­quires enor­mous state co­or­di­na­tion and mar­ket pro­tec­tion.

Cana­da’s ex­pe­ri­ence pre­views broad­er chal­lenges. As dig­i­tal plat­forms grow in im­por­tance, the re­la­tion­ship be­tween tech­no­log­i­cal de­pen­den­cy and eco­nom­ic sov­er­eign­ty will de­fine the next decade. Na­tions face a choice: ac­cept dig­i­tal vas­salage or in­vest in in­de­pen­dence.

The mes­sage from Cana­da’s ca­pit­u­la­tion is un­mis­tak­able: chal­lenge US dig­i­tal gi­ants and face eco­nom­ic co­er­cion. Imag­ine the threats fac­ing any na­tion at­tempt­ing true dig­i­tal in­de­pen­dence. The age of dig­i­tal em­pire is here—the ques­tion is whether na­tions will chart a path to­ward sov­er­eign­ty or ac­cept al­go­rith­mic sub­mis­sion.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored