JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, June 11, 2025

Will Colm lower fuel prices tomorrow?

by

Peter Christopher
254 days ago
20240928

In many of the last nine bud­get pre­sen­ta­tions, Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert has paid at­ten­tion to the fu­el sub­sidy.

Over nine fis­cal years, dat­ing back to his first pre­sen­ta­tion in Oc­to­ber 2015, Im­bert has made six ad­just­ments to fu­el prices to re­duce ex­pen­di­ture on the sub­sidy, while al­so out­lin­ing plans last year to cap the sub­sidy at $1 bil­lion:

• In 2016, the price of su­per gaso­line was in­creased from $2.70 by 15 per cent to $3.11. A sim­i­lar per­cent­age in­crease was ap­plied to diesel as it was ad­just­ed from $1.50 to $1.72;

• In 2017, diesel alone in­creased by an­oth­er 15 per cent from $1.98 to $2.30;

• In 2018, su­per gaso­line raised from $3.58 to $3.97 per litre, while diesel was raised again from $2.30 to $3.41 per litre;

• A year lat­er, su­per alone would be ad­just­ed, from $3.97 per litre to $4.97;

• In 2022 there were two ad­just­ments, in April of that year dur­ing the mid-year bud­get re­view, pre­mi­um and su­per gas were raised to $6.75 and $5.97 re­spec­tive­ly with diesel see­ing a 50-cent in­crease to $3.91 per litre;

• In Im­bert’s 2023 bud­get pre­sen­ta­tion, the price of gas would be ad­just­ed for the last time to date with pre­mi­um and su­per prices in­creas­ing by a dol­lar to $7.75 and $6.97 with diesel again in­creas­ing by 50 cents to $4.41.

Around that time, the min­is­ter would al­so state that, in a bid to re­duce gov­ern­ment spend­ing on the fu­el sub­sidy, there would be a cap on the fu­el sub­sidy of $1 bil­lion.

In the Eco­nom­ic Bul­letin for Ju­ly 2024, in a para­graph de­tail­ing gov­ern­ment ex­pen­di­ture for the first 9 months of fis­cal 2024, the Cen­tral Bank stat­ed, “Trans­fers to house­holds fell by $1.2 bil­lion (year-on-year) to $7 bil­lion in the nine months to June 2024, as there were no fu­el sub­si­dies pay­ments com­pared with $1 bil­lion in the pre­vi­ous fis­cal year pe­ri­od.”

This sug­gest­ed that the gov­ern­ment may not have had to con­tribute to the fu­el sub­sidy at all for the cur­rent fis­cal year.

How­ev­er, this ap­peared to be con­trary to En­er­gy Min­is­ter Stu­art Young’s con­tri­bu­tion to a stand­ing fi­nance com­mit­tee fol­low­ing the mid-year bud­get de­bate in June where he said $500 mil­lion had been al­lo­cat­ed to cov­er the sub­sidy in the bud­get with an ad­di­tion­al $571 mil­lion be­ing sought to cov­er the sub­sidy for the rest of the year.

This would sug­gest that once again, the Gov­ern­ment would pay $ 1 bil­lion in fu­el sub­sidy costs for fis­cal 2024.

Young con­firmed in that sit­ting that the Gov­ern­ment had paid $1.67 bil­lion in 2022 for the fu­el sub­sidy while in 2023, it was $1.845 bil­lion.

Since Im­bert’s first bud­get pre­sen­ta­tion the sub­sidy has been $2.1 Bil­lion in 2015, $400.8 mil­lion in 2016. $528.6 mil­lion in 2017, $739 mil­lion in 2018, $276.7 mil­lion in 2019, $86 mil­lion in 2020 and $431 mil­lion in 2021. 

This would mean the gov­ern­ment would have spent about $9 bil­lion on the sub­sidy in 9 years.

From 2006-2016, ag­gre­gate fu­el sub­si­dies amount­ed to $31 bil­lion, ac­cord­ing to a re­port from the Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter.

The Busi­ness Guardian reached out to the Cen­tral Bank to clar­i­fy the Ju­ly 2024 Eco­nom­ic Bul­letin’s state­ment con­cern­ing the sub­sidy pay­ment, but did not get a re­sponse up to the time of pub­li­ca­tion.

How­ev­er, en­er­gy econ­o­mist Gre­go­ry McGuire ex­plained that based on pric­ing da­ta and pro­duc­tion lev­els, it was un­like­ly that the sub­sidy would not have been paid by the gov­ern­ment this year.

He in­stead ex­plained that based on es­ti­mates the gov­ern­ment would have to pay $640m to cov­er the sub­sidy for fis­cal 2024.

He al­so ex­plained that a re­duc­tion or ab­sence of pay­ment de­tailed by the Cen­tral Bank may not mean the sub­sidy was not cov­ered.

McGuire said, “It doesn’t nec­es­sar­i­ly mean that that is no sub­sidy. The cost of sub­sidy is shared be­tween the Gov­ern­ment and the E&P (Ex­plo­ration and Pro­duc­tion) com­pa­nies like bpTT, Peren­co, EOG and Shell. All com­pa­nies pro­duc­ing more that 3,500 bbl/day must pay up to 4 per cent of their gross in­come as the pe­tro­le­um levy. That goes to off­set the cost of the fu­el sub­sidy. Gov­ern­ment’s share kicks in if and when the share of the com­pa­nies does not cov­er the sub­sidy ful­ly.”

He al­so felt it was un­like­ly that in­creased use of elec­tric and hy­brid ve­hi­cles had enough of an im­pact on fu­el con­sump­tion and by ex­ten­sion the sub­sidy ex­pen­di­ture.

“In gen­er­al, an in­crease in elec­tric and hy­brid ve­hi­cles would re­sult in a slow­er growth/de­cline in fu­el con­sump­tion. Low­er fu­el con­sump­tion re­sults in a low­er over­all sub­sidy bur­den,” said McGuire.

“How­ev­er, I do not think that the num­ber of EVs and hy­brids on the roads is suf­fi­cient to im­pact the sub­sidy bur­den in this man­ner.”

The econ­o­mist how­ev­er said it was not like­ly an in­di­ca­tor that the price of gas could go down for mo­torists. This he stressed was as a re­sult of the fact that the long-promised lib­er­al­i­sa­tion of fu­el prices, which was sug­gest­ed by Im­bert in 2020, had not yet been im­ple­ment­ed.

In fact, in the fis­cal 2023 bud­get de­bate, Prime Min­is­ter Dr Kei­th Row­ley had even de­tailed how the ad­just­ment could hap­pen stat­ing that based on the cal­cu­la­tions at that time, at an av­er­age price of US$85 a bar­rel for oil, the price of pre­mi­um gaso­line should drop to $6.92.

Su­per would drop to $6.66, if the in­ter­na­tion­al price of oil drops to US$80, pre­mi­um should fall to $6.28 and su­per to $6.05, while an in­ter­na­tion­al fu­el price of US$75 pre­mi­um should see the pre­mi­um price fall to $5.68 and su­per will de­crease to $5.43.

Based on in­for­ma­tion on the sta­tista web­site, the av­er­age price of West Texas In­ter­me­di­ate (WTI) for the pe­ri­od Oc­to­ber 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024, was US$79.27.

How­ev­er, this, and the promise that gas sta­tions would have these prices ad­just­ed month­ly nev­er ma­te­ri­alised.

“The ini­tial pro­pos­al when Gov­ern­ment an­nounced its pol­i­cy po­si­tion on the lib­er­al­i­sa­tion of the fu­els mar­ket was that a mech­a­nism would be put in place so that pump prices would move with in­ter­na­tion­al mar­ket prices.

“This mech­a­nism now pre­vails in Ja­maica and Bar­ba­dos. How­ev­er, it has not yet been in­tro­duced in Trinidad and To­ba­go,” said McGuire, who had long voiced his sup­port for lib­er­al­i­sa­tion to be im­ple­ment­ed as he stressed that fu­el sub­si­dies ben­e­fit the rich more than the poor and lead to poor con­sump­tion pat­terns and dis­tort­ed mar­kets.

Ad­di­tion­al­ly, the sub­sidy is con­trary to glob­al calls for re­duc­tion of car­bon emis­sions, he stat­ed pre­vi­ous­ly.

On Fri­day, WTI closed at US$68.18.

How­ev­er the Prime Min­is­ter al­so ex­plained dur­ing the 2023 bud­get con­tri­bu­tion that a drop in in­ter­na­tion­al en­er­gy prices would al­so have ad­verse ef­fect on Gov­ern­ment rev­enues.

This was proven over the course of the fis­cal year, as low­er-than-ex­pect­ed en­er­gy prices im­pact­ed Gov­ern­ment rev­enues for fis­cal 2024.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored