JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, July 10, 2025

Govt moves to allow retirement from 60 onwards

by

Gail Alexander
2207 days ago
20190624
Allyson West

Allyson West

Gov­ern­ment is "eye­ing" op­tions, in­clud­ing al­low­ing peo­ple to choose to re­tire at var­i­ous ages from 60 on­wards, in its bid to se­cure the Na­tion­al In­sur­ance (NIS) fund.

But there's def­i­nite­ly no rec­om­men­da­tion or con­sid­er­a­tion to re­duce the NIS pen­sion.

Min­is­ter in the Min­istry of in Fi­nance Alyson West con­firmed the po­si­tions yes­ter­day when asked by the T&T Guardian about re­cent con­cerns about the NIS sys­tem/re­tire­ment age voiced by the Op­po­si­tion and labour lead­ers pri­or to, and dur­ing Labour Day.

UNC MP Rudy In­dars­ingh, dur­ing re­cent de­bate on amend­ments to in­crease pen­sions for leg­is­la­tors, judges, the PM and pres­i­dent, called on Fi­nance Min­is­ter Colm Im­bert to say if Gov­ern­ment would "freeze" the NIS pen­sion at $3,000, whether it would be re­duced in­cre­men­tal­ly over the years by six per cent and whether Gov­ern­ment would in­crease the re­tire­ment age from 60 to 65.

An­oth­er news­pa­per sub­se­quent­ly quot­ed OW­TU's An­cel Ro­get at Labour Day cel­e­bra­tions as an­nounc­ing unions should pre­pare to protest against a "pro­pos­al to raise the re­tire­ment age from 60 to 65." State-owned TTT al­so re­port­ed Ro­get al­so claimed there are "plans by the gov­ern­ment to dras­ti­cal­ly re­duce the NIS pen­sion."

But when asked about it, West dis­put­ed those in­ter­pre­ta­tions.

She said Gov­ern­ment had recog­nised that the NIS fund isn't grow­ing at a suf­fi­cient­ly ro­bust rate to cov­er pen­sions go­ing for­wards. She ac­knowl­edged that the main rec­om­men­da­tions by NIB's com­mit­tee on the is­sue had in­volved in­creas­ing NIS con­tri­bu­tions and in­creas­ing the re­tire­ment age to 65.

But she added while the gov­ern­ment was giv­ing ac­tive con­sid­er­a­tions to those as­pects and is hav­ing stake­hold­er dis­cus­sions, var­i­ous op­tions are be­ing ex­am­ined

"We're look­ing at var­i­ous op­tions; what we'd con­tem­plat­ed start­ing with was grad­u­al­ly in­creas­ing the (re­tire­ment) age to 65. Giv­ing peo­ple the op­tion to re­tire from age 60 on­wards is some­thing that will prob­a­bly be con­sid­ered," she added when asked.

"A lot of peo­ple want to work past 60 be­cause age 60 now isn't like 60 was years ago. So a lot of peo­ple don't mind the op­tion to con­tin­ue work­ing,"

"One has to con­sid­er in­sti­tu­tion­al mem­o­ry and ex­per­tise be­ing lost if peo­ple all re­tire at age 60. But this would have to be bal­anced against giv­ing young grad­u­ates the op­por­tu­ni­ty to en­ter the work­force - so we're look­ing at the whole pic­ture,"

In her view, she said the pen­sion is­sue needs to ex­am­ined holis­ti­cal­ly and not on­ly the NIS as­pect alone, "The cost of se­nior cit­i­zens' pen­sion is al­so an as­pect that needs ex­am­in­ing and pub­lic ser­vants' pen­sions al­so need to be ex­am­ined," West said, adding that if one area is ad­just­ed, oth­er as­pects may be­come im­bal­anced.

Con­tact­ed on his thoughts on a stag­ger­ing lev­el of re­tire­ment ages from 60 on­wards, In­dars­ingh said he'd have to ex­am­ine that.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored