JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Tuesday, July 22, 2025

Guyana heightens military prep as Venezuela’s Dec 3 referendum nears

by

Asha Javeed
605 days ago
20231126

Lead Ed­i­tor In­ves­ti­ga­tions

asha.javeed@guardian.co.tt

Guyana’s Pres­i­dent Mo­hamed Ir­faan Ali says the coun­try has in­sti­tut­ed con­tin­gency plan­ning to cater for all even­tu­al­i­ties as ten­sions sim­mer over bor­der dis­pute be­tween Guyana and Venezuela.

It comes a week be­fore Venezuela holds a ref­er­en­dum on De­cem­ber 3 to seek ap­proval to re­ject the Ar­bi­tral Award of 1899, which fixed the bound­ary be­tween British Guiana and Venezuela, to for­mal­ly an­nex the Es­se­qui­bo Re­gion by in­cor­po­rat­ing it in­to Venezuela as a new Venezue­lan state, to give Venezue­lan cit­i­zen­ship and na­tion­al iden­ti­ty cards to the Guyanese pop­u­la­tion, and to de­vel­op the ter­ri­to­ry as part of Venezuela.

The Es­se­qui­bo Re­gion com­pris­es more than two-thirds of the whole of Guyana it­self.

Guyana has ar­gued that all of these ac­tions are vi­o­la­tions of the most fun­da­men­tal prin­ci­ples of in­ter­na­tion­al law, en­shrined in the Unit­ed Na­tions and OAS char­ters.

“You will ap­pre­ci­ate that be­cause this plan­ning hinges on na­tion­al se­cu­ri­ty con­sid­er­a­tions, I can­not re­veal the de­tails of our plans,” he told the Sun­day Guardian in an ex­clu­sive in­ter­view last week.

On the spe­cif­ic ques­tion of pos­si­ble mil­i­tary ac­tion, he ex­plained that he was go­ing around to re­gions of Guyana, bor­der­ing Venezuela, “to calm and re­as­sure the peo­ple there”.

“I have told them that my gov­ern­ment is do­ing every­thing with­in its means to en­sure their safe­ty. I have al­so told them that I do not be­lieve that Venezuela will act reck­less­ly. How­ev­er, I al­so said that de­spite this be­lief, Guyana will re­main vig­i­lant and will not be caught un­pre­pared,” he said.

Ali spent two days last week in com­mu­ni­ties along the Guyana-Venezuela bor­der in Re­gions One and Sev­en and held meet­ings in Mabaru­ma, Port Kai­tu­ma Barami­ta, Kaikan and Arau, to meet res­i­dents and al­lay con­cerns and even spent the night with the Guyana De­fence Force.

In a Face­book post yes­ter­day, Ali said that his Gov­ern­ment was fo­cused on a peace­ful and just res­o­lu­tion, but would not be “tak­ing any­thing for grant­ed” and has been putting mea­sures in place to en­sure the safe­ty of its cit­i­zens and bor­ders.

“I came here my­self to as­sure you that we are to­geth­er 100 per cent, we are on top of this, we are work­ing at every sin­gle lev­el, we have the full sup­port of our part­ners and in­ter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty and you have noth­ing to fear—we are with you 100 per cent. We pre­fer to err on the side of cau­tion; that is why we are tak­ing every step, that is why we are putting every­thing in place ... we can­not take any­thing for grant­ed,” he said in his post.

In an in­ter­view post­ed on­line, he al­so said that Guyana was strength­en­ing its de­fence with the Unit­ed States on the mat­ter.

Last Thurs­day, Guyana’s Vice Pres­i­dent Bhar­rat Jagdeo told AFP news that two teams from the US De­part­ment of De­fence will vis­it Guyana this week.

“We’re in­ter­est­ed in main­tain­ing peace in our coun­try and in our bor­ders, but we’re go­ing to be work­ing with our al­lies to en­sure that we plan for all even­tu­al­i­ties,” Jagdeo had said.

“We were nev­er in­ter­est­ed in mil­i­tary bases, but we have to pro­tect our na­tion­al in­ter­est,” Jagdeo had said, adding that de­fence co-op­er­a­tion was be­ing pur­sued “with a num­ber of coun­tries”.

“All the op­tions avail­able for us to de­fend our coun­try will be pur­sued. Every op­tion,” he said.

On No­vem­ber 14 and 15, the In­ter­na­tion­al Court of Jus­tice in The Hague held hear­ings on Guyana’s Re­quest for Pro­vi­sion­al Mea­sures, by which Guyana sought an Or­der from the Court to pre­vent Venezuela from tak­ing any ac­tion to vi­o­late Guyana’s sov­er­eign­ty in the Es­se­qui­bo Re­gion.

Guyana sought the Court’s pro­tec­tion in re­sponse to Venezuela’s sched­ul­ing of a ref­er­en­dum that threat­ens grave, ir­repara­ble and in­cal­cu­la­ble harm to our coun­try.

“All of them threat­en Guyana’s sov­er­eign­ty, ter­ri­to­r­i­al in­tegri­ty and po­lit­i­cal in­de­pen­dence,” Ali had said in a state­ment at the time.

“But what Venezuela has planned for De­cem­ber 3 is no or­di­nary con­sul­ta­tion. What Venezuela seeks by way of this so-called ref­er­en­dum is a li­cence not on­ly to break the law but to crum­ble it to bits—a li­cence to vi­o­late and de­stroy Guyana’s fun­da­men­tal rights as a sov­er­eign state.”

No con­flict for T&T

Ali said he does not see a con­flict for T&T as ten­sions be­tween Guyana and Venezuela sim­mer.

While T&T and Guyana are a part of Cari­com, with Guyana as a point on en­sur­ing food se­cu­ri­ty for the re­gion, T&T has al­so been in ne­go­ti­a­tions with Venezuela to se­cure nat­ur­al gas from the Drag­on Field to en­sure this coun­try’s en­er­gy life­line.

“We do not see a con­flict­ed sit­u­a­tion, at all. Guyana is deeply en­cour­aged by the re­cent state­ment is­sued from Port-of-Spain. Prime Min­is­ter Row­ley stat­ed that ‘Guyana knows that it has the sup­port of Cari­com on this mat­ter and Venezuela knows that Cari­com sup­ports Guyana on this mat­ter,’” said Ali.

Last week, Row­ley said that he was con­fi­dent of a peace­ful res­o­lu­tion as T&T viewed Venezuela as its clos­est neigh­bour, with close work­ing re­la­tion­ships, and T&T was heav­i­ly in­vest­ed in Guyana as Cari­com’s cap­i­tal.

Dr Row­ley ad­mit­ted there were al­ways risks, in­clud­ing that of a “nu­clear”-style po­lit­i­cal chain re­ac­tion, but said Cari­com wished the re­gion to be a zone of peace. Row­ley did not want to see the re­la­tion­ship be­tween Venezuela and Guyana dam­aged.

Guyana’s oil dis­cov­er­ies have made it the world’s biggest re­serves of crude per capi­ta, while Venezuela sits on the largest proven re­serves over­all.

Ali said that en­er­gy com­pa­nies have not ex­pressed con­cerns about the ten­sions be­tween the ter­ri­to­ries but he ex­pects the ref­er­en­dum to be suc­cess­ful.

“We do not dis­pute the strong like­li­hood that all the pro­posed ques­tions in the ref­er­en­dum will be an­swered in the af­fir­ma­tive. We are pre­pared for such an out­come. Guyana has ar­gued its case be­fore the ICJ about our re­quest for Pro­vi­sion­al Mea­sures, and we are con­fi­dent that the court will de­ter­mine mea­sures favourable to us. How­ev­er, we are al­so mind­ful that the Bo­li­var­i­an Re­pub­lic of Venezuela has in­di­cat­ed to the court that re­gard­less of the de­ci­sion of the court, Venezuela will pro­ceed with the sched­uled ref­er­en­dum.

“Guyana has al­ways placed its trust in the rule of in­ter­na­tion­al law, in diplo­ma­cy as a first line of de­fence, in de­fence co-op­er­a­tion and the sol­i­dar­i­ty from the in­ter­na­tion­al com­mu­ni­ty. But let me make it clear, we har­bour no in­ter­est or in­cli­na­tion to threat­en any state or any­one. We are a peace­ful na­tion and we are com­mit­ted to the peace­ful res­o­lu­tion of dis­putes in ac­cor­dance with the Char­ter of the Unit­ed Na­tions, and specif­i­cal­ly in re­la­tion to this is­sue, to ac­cept­ing the out­come of the ju­ridi­cal pro­ceed­ings be­fore the In­ter­na­tion­al Court of Jus­tice.

“More im­por­tant­ly, all of Guyana stands unit­ed in de­fend­ing our ter­ri­to­r­i­al in­tegri­ty and sov­er­eign­ty. The mem­bers of the par­lia­men­tary Op­po­si­tion have pledged their sup­port in the mat­ter. We wel­come this de­vel­op­ment. In­ter­nal­ly, there is an over­whelm­ing cho­rus of sup­port for the pro­tec­tion and preser­va­tion of our ter­ri­to­r­i­al in­tegri­ty. All Guyana stands as One Guyana on this is­sue,” he said.

He ex­plained that the ref­er­en­dum was an in­ten­tion by Venezuela to ob­tain an over­whelm­ing pop­u­lar man­date to re­ject the ju­ris­dic­tion of the Court; to pre-empt a fu­ture judg­ment of the Court and, in so do­ing, un­der­mine the au­thor­i­ty and ef­fec­tive­ness of the ICJ.

“We have al­so stat­ed that through the man­date ob­tained from this planned ref­er­en­dum, Venezuela pur­ports to an­nex and to in­cor­po­rate in­to its ter­ri­to­ry the en­tire Es­se­qui­bo re­gion, and to grant Venezue­lan cit­i­zen­ship to the pop­u­la­tion. Guyana’s ap­proach to the ICJ for Pro­vi­sion­al Mea­sures is not an at­tempt at in­ter­fer­ing in the sov­er­eign right of Venezuela to con­sult with its peo­ple on is­sues it con­sid­ers of na­tion­al im­por­tance. How­ev­er, we in­sist that such a ref­er­en­dum can­not im­pugn or vi­o­late, im­plic­it­ly or ex­plic­it­ly, the sov­er­eign­ty or ter­ri­to­r­i­al in­tegri­ty of Guyana,” he said.

In­ter­na­tion­al Sup­port

Ali not­ed that the Caribbean Com­mu­ni­ty stands in the cor­ner of Guyana. “From the time it be­came clear that Venezuela would hold the ref­er­en­dum, the Caribbean Com­mu­ni­ty is­sued an un­equiv­o­cal state­ment. In its state­ment, Cari­com said that two ques­tions in the ref­er­en­dum, if an­swered af­fir­ma­tive­ly, would au­tho­rise the an­nex­a­tion of ter­ri­to­ry be­long­ing to the Co­op­er­a­tive Re­pub­lic of Guyana. Cari­com em­pha­sised that in­ter­na­tion­al law strict­ly pro­hibits one state from uni­lat­er­al­ly seiz­ing or an­nex­ing the ter­ri­to­ry of an­oth­er state.

“The Com­mu­ni­ty al­so raised alarm about the lan­guage in the ap­proved ques­tions, which seeks af­fir­ma­tion and im­ple­men­ta­tion of Venezuela’s stance on the is­sue “by all means, ac­cord­ing to/with the law”. It said that the phrase “by all means” could po­ten­tial­ly in­clude the use of force or war.

“It went on to ex­press the opin­ion that the ref­er­en­dum by Venezuela holds no va­lid­i­ty in in­ter­na­tion­al law and could un­der­mine peace and se­cu­ri­ty in the re­gion. Cari­com re­it­er­at­ed its sup­port for the ju­di­cial process and en­cour­aged Venezuela to ful­ly en­gage in the In­ter­na­tion­al Court of Jus­tice to reach a peace­ful and eq­ui­table res­o­lu­tion in ac­cor­dance with in­ter­na­tion­al law,” he said.

“Guyana is pleased with the stance tak­en by the Caribbean Com­mu­ni­ty. The Gov­ern­ment of Guyana has nev­er been in doubt as to where the mem­ber states of Cari­com stand in re­la­tion to Guyana’s ter­ri­to­r­i­al in­tegri­ty and sov­er­eign­ty. Sev­er­al in­ter­na­tion­al part­ners have al­so ex­pressed their po­si­tions un­am­bigu­ous­ly,” he said.

“The Unit­ed States’ po­si­tion was un­der­scored by its Am­bas­sador to the Or­ga­ni­za­tion of Amer­i­can States (OAS), Fran­cis­co Mo­ra. He af­firmed the Amer­i­can Gov­ern­ment’s sup­port for Guyana’s sov­er­eign right to ex­ploit its nat­ur­al re­sources and re­ject­ed the at­tempt by Venezuela to set­tle the ter­ri­to­r­i­al dis­pute out­side of in­ter­na­tion­al law. He re­peat­ed the Unit­ed States’ re­spect for the 1899 Ar­bi­tral Tri­bunal Award and urged re­spect for the on­go­ing pro­ceed­ings at the ICJ.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored