JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, July 24, 2025

Industrial Court president warns employers:

Caution in terminating workers during COVID

by

Derek Achong
1771 days ago
20200917

In­dus­tri­al Court pres­i­dent Deb­o­rah Thomas-Fe­lix has warned em­ploy­ers against wrong­ful­ly ter­mi­nat­ing work­ers, who fall ill or have fam­i­ly com­mit­ments dur­ing the on­go­ing COVID-19 pan­dem­ic.

De­liv­er­ing her an­nu­al ad­dress dur­ing the open­ing of the In­dus­tri­al Court’s 2020/2021 law term yes­ter­day, Thomas-Fe­lix said the court not­ed an in­crease in the fil­ing of in­dus­tri­al re­lat­ed of­fences against em­ploy­ers, who had im­prop­er­ly sought to ter­mi­nate work­ers with­out con­sul­ta­tion since the start of the pan­dem­ic in March.

She said, “The pan­dem­ic ought not be an ex­cuse to flout the prin­ci­ples and prac­tices of good in­dus­tri­al re­la­tions, to flout labour stan­dards, and to flout the laws of the coun­try.”

While she not­ed that ter­mi­na­tion is on­ly per­mit­ted in cer­tain cir­cum­stances, she said there is a law­ful process of re­trench­ment that could be used due to the eco­nom­ic fall­out faced by com­pa­nies as a con­se­quence of Gov­ern­ment’s coro­n­avirus mea­sures.

“Em­ploy­ers are re­mind­ed they must re­spect and ad­here to the rule of law when mak­ing these tough de­ci­sions, which would af­fect the liveli­hoods of work­ers and the sur­vival of their busi­ness­es,” she said, as she called on em­ploy­ers es­pe­cial­ly small­er busi­ness­es with­out a ma­jor­i­ty recog­nised union to still hold de­ci­sions with em­ploy­ees be­fore tak­ing dras­tic de­ci­sions.

While she not­ed that there had been com­plaints by em­ploy­ers and work­ers over de­lays by the Board of In­land Rev­enue (BIR) in terms of pro­cess­ing such re­trench­ment and cor­re­spond­ing sev­er­ance pay­ments, Thomas-Fe­lix said it may be due to an in­crease work­load.

“While I am not de­fend­ing the BIR, these are not nor­mal times, the re­al­i­ty, as I see it, is that there is an on­go­ing ro­ta­tion of pub­lic ser­vants in­clud­ing the staff at the Board of In­land Rev­enue due to the COVID-19 pan­dem­ic,” Thomas-Fe­lix said.

Through­out her speech, Thomas-Fe­lix re­peat­ed­ly called on em­ploy­ers and trade unions to en­gage in mean­ing­ful so­cial di­a­logue to help re­solve is­sues in an am­i­ca­ble way and find so­lu­tions in­clud­ing new work­ing arrange­ments.

“We should al­ways bear in mind that there is life af­ter COVID-19 and con­sid­er the im­mense val­ue to be gained if we adopt and ad­here to In­ter­na­tion­al Labour Stan­dards, par­tic­u­lar­ly so­cial di­a­logue to as­sist, to pro­mote and to main­tain a sys­tem of op­por­tu­ni­ties for all and to ob­tain de­cent, pro­duc­tive work in con­di­tions of free­dom, eq­ui­ty, se­cu­ri­ty and dig­ni­ty in the fu­ture,” Thomas-Fe­lix said.

“The main take away from this cri­sis is that the work­place, and the world of work as we know it, have changed for­ev­er and that em­ploy­ees and trade unions play a key role in as­sist­ing work­ers to nav­i­gate these un­chart­ed ter­ri­to­ry and in as­sist­ing to sta­bilise the labour mar­ket,” she added.

Dur­ing her speech, Thomas-Fe­lix al­so weighed in on on­go­ing pub­lic health reg­u­la­tions, which re­stricts large gath­er­ings. Trade unions were not ini­tial­ly con­sid­ered es­sen­tial busi­ness­es un­der the reg­u­la­tions, which have since been amend­ed to in­clude them.

Thomas-Fe­lix not­ed that while free­dom of as­so­ci­a­tion is a fun­da­men­tal right it may be fet­tered dur­ing pe­ri­ods of cri­sis.

“Al­though these re­stric­tions would af­fect large gath­er­ings by unions, it is my re­spect­ful view that they do not amount to an abuse by the State but rather a de­ci­sion by the State to pro­tect cit­i­zens,” she said.

She sug­gest­ed that trade unions should con­tin­ue to find cre­ative means us­ing tech­nol­o­gy to ad­vo­cate for their mem­bers and to en­gage in protest ac­tion, if it is re­quired.

Thomas-Fe­lix not­ed that the court was not im­mune and dur­ing the pan­dem­ic it held 503 re­mote case man­age­ment hear­ings via video con­fer­enc­ing.

While Thomas-Fe­lix not­ed that the ser­vice re­ceived most­ly pos­i­tive re­views, with court users re­quest­ing sim­i­lar hear­ings for open court cas­es and con­cil­i­a­tion, she said that the ex­tend­ed ser­vices were not pos­si­ble due to the court’s con­straints with re­sources.

Re­fer­ring to the court’s sta­tis­tics for the 2019/2020 law term, Thomas-Fe­lix not­ed that there were 905 new fil­ings—505 less than last year.

She at­trib­uted the marked de­crease to the pan­dem­ic as the court was ini­tial­ly closed for three months but not­ed that the tem­po­rary clo­sure as­sist­ed the court in in­creas­ing its dis­po­si­tion rate from 60.9 per­cent in 2018/2019 to 78.1 per­cent dur­ing the last term.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored