A High Court judge has given a Justice of the Peace (JP)—sued by businessman Adrian Scoon for granting a search warrant for his properties as part of an investigation into whether he breached ongoing public health regulations by operating a party boat– an opportunity to file evidence opposing the case.
Guardian Media understands that while JP Oliver Boodhu was served with the legal proceedings by Scoon’s legal team after several failed attempts, neither Boodhu nor any legal representative for him attended a virtual case management hearing of the case before Justice Ricky Rahim on Monday.
Despite Boodhu’s absence, Rahim still set timelines for him and the Solicitor General’s Department, which was also served and was unrepresented at the hearing, to file evidence in opposition.
Guardian Media understands that if one or both parties fail to meet the deadlines and participate in the case, it will continue in their absence.
In the lawsuit, Scoon’s lawyers are claiming that the warrant issued by Boodhu on December 29 last year, was null and void as it contradicted the terms of the Summary Offences Act.
They are also contending that the issuance of the warrant constituted an abuse of power and an improper exercise of Boodhu’s discretion.
Through the lawsuit, Scoon is seeking a declaration over Boodhu’s decision and an order quashing it.
Scoon, the son of Trade and Industry Minister Paula Gopee-Scoon, came under scrutiny after police raided a “Seaside Brunch” event on board the MV Ocean Pelican on Boxing Day for allegedly breaching the COVID-19 regulations, which prohibits the operation of a party boat.
Scoon denied any wrongdoing, as he claimed that the vessel was converted to a safe zone under the regulations.
Finance Minister Colm Imbert weighed in on the issue, as he confirmed that he had not authorised a special restaurant liquor license for the vessel or Scoon.
Officials of the Customs and Excise Division then wrote to Scoon’s legal team informing them that the two special restaurant liquor licenses remained null and void and would be cancelled. The licenses were subsequently returned.
Attorney General Faris Al-Rawi was also identified in the issue as newspaper reports revealed that he had a telephone conversation with Scoon, while he (Scoon) was being questioned by police after they stopped the event.
Al-Rawi admitted to having the conversation but repeatedly denied giving Scoon legal advice on the issue or seeking to influence the police’s investigation.
The T&T Police Service (TTPS) applied to compel Scoon to disclose his passwords and biometric data for his electronic devices which were seized under the warrant issued by Boodhu.
Delivering a judgment late last month, High Court Judge Geoffrey Henderson denied the application under the Interception of Communications Act.
Henderson said that he was of the view that the request was excessive and disproportionate in light of the fact that investigators were seeking evidence that Scoon advertised the event on social media.
“While it is within the discretion of the applicant to seek to gather additional advertisements, I see no rational connection with that aim and the wide breadth of the orders sought,” Henderson said.
Last month, the Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP) gave investigators instructions to charge Scoon and event promoter Shaheed Abdullah, via summons, for holding a public party and operating a party boat.
Scoon, Abdullah and all the attendees of the event are also to be charged with gathering in a public place in excess of 10 people, in contravention of the regulations at the time.
Scoon is being represented by Kiel Taklalsingh and Stefan Ramkissoon.
