Tobago House of Assembly (THA) Chief Secretary Orville London has written Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar, expressing surprise and disappointment that his requests to honour the 30-year-old tradition of appointing nominees of the THA to State boards and national committees has been totally ignored.
London is requesting an early meeting with the Prime Minister to "discuss the THA representation on boards and committees and other issues that are likely to have an adverse affect on the promotion of harmony in the affairs of Trinidad and Tobago."
In fact, he noted in his letter, dated December 9, that not only have none of the 38 nominees recommended by the THA been appointed but there has not even been acknowledgement of, or verbal response to the requests. This is the third letter on the issue the THA Chief Secretary has written the Prime Minister since she took office. The first was on June 7 and the second on August 4 and there has been no acknowledgement.
In his December 9 letter, London said no one could dispute that many of the boards and committees were charged with the responsibility to make decisions on areas of development that fall under the purview of the THA.
He added that it would therefore be counterproductive and could even foster avoidable conflict if the assembly was to be excluded from the decision-making process.
The Chief Secretary emphasised that it was unprecedented for the assembly to be denied representation on boards and committees such as the Tourism Development Company, the Airports Authority of Trinidad and Tobago, the National Training Agency, the Sports Company of Trinidad and Tobago, the Agricultural Development Bank, the National Self-Help Commission and the Public Transport Service Corporation, among others.
London told the Prime Minister that over the past 30 years, every Central Government administration had appointed to boards and committees, Tobagonians who were not recommended by the THA, but this was never done at the expense of THA representation. He hoped that her administration would reconsider that new policy which seemed to be ignoring a three-decade old practice.
