JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Sunday, July 6, 2025

Mark issues a stern warning in defence of Senators

‘Intimidation, harassment wont be taken lightly’

by

5 days ago
20250701
Senate President Wade Mark

Senate President Wade Mark

ABRAHAM DIAZ

Gail Alexan­der

Se­nior Po­lit­i­cal Re­porter

Sen­ate Pres­i­dent Wade Mark is­sued a stern warn­ing to mem­bers of the Up­per House yes­ter­day that words or ac­tions that cross the line in­to ha­rass­ment, in­tim­i­da­tion, or at­tempts to shame sen­a­tors for how they vote, or to pres­sure them to vote in a par­tic­u­lar way, will not be tol­er­at­ed or tak­en light­ly.

“Let this serve as a clear warn­ing to all. This House, and cer­tain­ly this chair, will act firm­ly to pro­tect the priv­i­leges, rights, and im­mu­ni­ties of this Sen­ate col­lec­tive­ly and each Sen­a­tor in­di­vid­u­al­ly,” Mark said in a strong state­ment to the Sen­ate.

Mark gave his rul­ing fol­low­ing Sun­day’s me­dia con­fer­ence by Unit­ed Na­tion­al Con­gress pub­lic re­la­tions of­fi­cer Kirk Meighoo, Pub­lic Util­i­ties Min­is­ter Bar­ry Padarath and Le­gal Af­fairs Min­is­ter Sad­dam Ho­sein. The trio launched a scathing at­tack on In­de­pen­dent Sen­a­tors about a re­cent de­bate in the Sen­ate and strong­ly called out the nine In­de­pen­dents to sup­port yes­ter­day’s de­bate on the Gov­ern­ment’s move to amend the Prime Min­is­ter’s Pen­sion Bill.

How­ev­er, Mark be­gan yes­ter­day’s sit­ting, stat­ing, “A se­ri­ous is­sue has been raised with me via cor­re­spon­dence, which I have de­ter­mined war­rants my ear­ly and ur­gent in­ter­ven­tion.

“Par­lia­men­tary priv­i­lege pro­vides es­sen­tial pro­tec­tion from ex­ter­nal in­ter­fer­ence of any kind. It guar­an­tees Mem­bers of this Par­lia­ment the free­dom to speak, de­lib­er­ate, and vote with­out fear or co­er­cion. This is en­shrined in Sec­tion 55(1) of the Con­sti­tu­tion of the Re­pub­lic of Trinidad and To­ba­go which pro­vides, and I quote: ‘Sub­ject to the pro­vi­sions of this Con­sti­tu­tion and to the rules and stand­ing or­ders reg­u­lat­ing the pro­ce­dure of the Sen­ate and House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives, there shall be free­dom of speech in the Sen­ate and House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives’.”

Mark added, “This free­dom is not a mere cour­tesy; it is a fun­da­men­tal con­sti­tu­tion­al right—sacro­sanct and is be­yond chal­lenge or com­pro­mise.

“As fur­ther af­firmed in Par­lia­men­tary Priv­i­lege in Cana­da (Sec­ond Edi­tion) by JP Joseph Main­got, QC, page 253: ‘To re­flect im­prop­er­ly on a vote in the House and the mo­tives of some Mem­bers is a breach of priv­i­lege’.

“Let me be clear: healthy crit­i­cism is not on­ly per­mit­ted, it is ex­pect­ed in any func­tion­ing democ­ra­cy. No one is sug­gest­ing that ex­pres­sions of dis­ap­point­ment over pol­i­cy out­comes, or dis­agree­ment with a vote, are out of bounds. But what we’re deal­ing with here is not mere crit­i­cism. When words or ac­tions cross the line in­to ha­rass­ment, in­tim­i­da­tion, or at­tempts to shame Sen­a­tors for how they vote or pres­sure them to vote in a par­tic­u­lar way - that is some­thing en­tire­ly dif­fer­ent — and it will not be tol­er­at­ed.”

The Sen­ate Pres­i­dent stressed: “Such ac­tions strike at the very heart of par­lia­men­tary democ­ra­cy and may con­sti­tute a se­ri­ous breach of priv­i­lege. They will NOT be tak­en light­ly.

“Every sin­gle mem­ber of this Sen­ate, whether In­de­pen­dent, Op­po­si­tion or Gov­ern­ment Sen­a­tor, pos­sess­es the in­alien­able right to speak and vote freely, guid­ed by con­science and with­out un­due in­flu­ence. These are not ab­stract ideals; they are bind­ing prin­ci­ples.

“Let this serve as a clear warn­ing to all. This House, and cer­tain­ly this chair, will act firm­ly to pro­tect the priv­i­leges, rights, and im­mu­ni­ties of this Sen­ate col­lec­tive­ly and each Sen­a­tor in­di­vid­u­al­ly. That pro­tec­tion will be ex­er­cised to the full ex­tent of the Sen­ate’s au­thor­i­ty and, if nec­es­sary, the ap­pro­pri­ate av­enues for re­dress will be pur­sued with­out hes­i­ta­tion.”

UNC not back­ing down

Mean­while, UNC PRO Meighoo, when con­tact­ed yes­ter­day, re­spond­ed to the Sen­ate Pres­i­dent’s warn­ing: “Analy­sis and crit­i­cism is not in­tim­i­da­tion. Fur­ther­more, I am a po­lit­i­cal sci­en­tist. Analysing pol­i­tics and the Con­sti­tu­tion is my pro­fes­sion. I stand by my every word.

“I too have an in­alien­able right to free­dom of po­lit­i­cal ex­pres­sion. I al­so have a right not to be in­tim­i­dat­ed or threat­ened in the course of do­ing my du­ty.”

Padarath read Guardian Me­dia’s ques­tion about Mark’s rul­ing via What­sApp but did not re­spond. Ho­sein al­so had no re­sponse.

Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar did not re­spond to ques­tions about the mat­ter.

How­ev­er, Gov­ern­ment Sen­a­tor Phillip Alexan­der said, “I stand in sol­i­dar­i­ty with Prime Min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bisses­sar and her team. Some is­sues were not­ed and raised and those who were named might want to do some in­tro­spec­tion. We have to work to­geth­er to serve the peo­ple of this coun­try and need to put aside any oth­er no­tion and get down to that busi­ness.”

Op­po­si­tion Sen­a­tor Faris Al-Rawi, in yes­ter­day’s Sen­ate de­bate, said of the in­tim­i­da­tion is­sue, “All eyes have been on the In­de­pen­dent bench since an in­cred­i­ble at­tack against the In­de­pen­dent bench by the Gov­ern­ment (on Sun­day). Les­son per­haps marked and learned, we new to this Par­lia­ment, I don’t think any­body means any­thing pe­jo­ra­tive.”


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored