JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 14, 2025

Padarath, relative face financial probes

by

Mark Bassant
1802 days ago
20200806
Princes Town MP Barry Padarath is shown copies of cheques by GMLs Mark Bassant during Padarath’s walkabout in the Buen Intento housing development in Princes Town on Wednesday.

Princes Town MP Barry Padarath is shown copies of cheques by GMLs Mark Bassant during Padarath’s walkabout in the Buen Intento housing development in Princes Town on Wednesday.

ABRAHAM DIAZ

Lead Ed­i­tor, In­ves­tiga­tive Desk

Princes Town MP Bar­ry Padarath says he can­not re­call why he is­sued two First Cit­i­zens bank cheques to­talling TT$135,800 in Oc­to­ber 2014 to then prime min­is­ter Kam­la Per­sad-Bissses­sar while he was her spe­cial ad­vi­sor. The cheques now form part of ev­i­dence col­lect­ed by the T&T Po­lice Ser­vice in a case in­volv­ing the MP and a fe­male rel­a­tive.

Guardian Me­dia ob­tained copies of the cheques, de­tailed cab­i­net notes and oth­er fi­nan­cial in­for­ma­tion which we were re­li­ably in­formed are at the cen­tre of the po­lice probe. Of­fi­cers have ob­tained sev­er­al le­gal or­ders over the last few months to pe­ruse sev­er­al bank ac­counts in the on­go­ing case, af­ter al­leged sus­pi­cious ac­tiv­i­ties re­lat­ed to the MP’s rel­a­tive were first flagged by the Fi­nan­cial In­tel­li­gence Unit of Trinidad and To­ba­go (FI­UTT).

Dur­ing a walk­a­bout in the Buen In­ten­to hous­ing com­mu­ni­ty in Princes Town on Wednes­day, Guardian Me­dia ques­tioned Padarath about the pay­ments made to Per­sad-Bisses­sar and if he re­mem­bered what they were for.

“I have no rec­ol­lec­tion for what this would have been for. It is, in fact, le­git­i­mate I can tell you that if it is, in fact, le­git­i­mate cheques, I can­not rec­ol­lect this was in 2014 but it would have been to­tal­ly above board,” Padarath said.

The source of the mon­ey and pay­ments are on­ly part of a wider po­lice in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to a com­pa­ny which is linked to Padarath’s rel­a­tive.

Doc­u­ments show that Padarath de­posit­ed close to $703,000 from his RBC Fi­nan­cial (Caribbean) Bank ac­count on March 7, 2016, to the rel­a­tive’s ac­count, al­so at the same bank, via an ac­count to ac­count trans­fer of the funds. The com­plex fi­nan­cial trail then points to the rel­a­tive set­ting up sev­er­al oth­er bank ac­counts, in­clud­ing two chequing ac­counts for her com­pa­ny.

Ac­cord­ing to the fi­nan­cial in­for­ma­tion ob­tained over the years, Padarath al­leged­ly made sev­er­al cheque pay­ments to the rel­a­tive amount­ing to hun­dreds of thou­sands of dol­lars and, in some cas­es, she trans­ferred these funds in­to in­sur­ance poli­cies and to her com­pa­ny.

In­ves­ti­ga­tors found that the rel­a­tive’s com­pa­ny was first reg­is­tered on Jan­u­ary 28, 2011, and had the ad­dress of #20 Green Heart Dri­ve, Cou­va North, Cou­va, which was the home ad­dress of both Padarath and the rel­a­tive in ques­tion.

Doc­u­men­ta­tion al­so re­vealed that for the pe­ri­od Jan­u­ary 15, 2014-Jan­u­ary 26, 2017, the sum of $162,500 was al­leged­ly paid to Padarath via cheques from the rel­a­tive’s com­pa­ny. There were three cheques for $50,000, $10,000 and $2,500 dur­ing that pe­ri­od, all paid on dif­fer­ent dates for the three-year pe­ri­od.

When ques­tioned about this pay­ment, Padarath smiled and said, “My on­ly com­ment to you is that I am an on­ly child and if you look at the date of those cheques, it was my birth­day and I am to­tal­ly above board and there is a clear at­tempt to sul­ly my name and I am not con­cerned one bit or the oth­er.”

A mon­ey trail tracked by au­thor­i­ties re­vealed that dur­ing the pe­ri­od 2013-2018, just over $15 mil­lion passed through the ac­counts of the rel­a­tive’s com­pa­ny. In­ci­den­tal­ly, un­der the Peo­ple’s Part­ner­ship gov­ern­ment, the com­pa­ny ob­tained con­tracts from the Ed­u­ca­tion Fa­cil­i­ties Com­pa­ny Lim­it­ed (EF­CL) and Pa­lo Seco Agri­cul­tur­al En­ter­pris­es Lim­it­ed (PSAEL) in the sum of $3.2 mil­lion be­tween the pe­ri­od 2012-2015.

One of the cheques Barry Padarath made out to UNC leader Kamla Persad Bissessar in 2014.

One of the cheques Barry Padarath made out to UNC leader Kamla Persad Bissessar in 2014.

Doc­u­ments ob­tained by in­ves­ti­ga­tors re­vealed that the rel­a­tive’s com­pa­ny se­cured nine con­tracts through the PSAEL dur­ing the pe­ri­od April 2012-2015. In­ves­ti­ga­tors found that four of the nine con­tracts were award­ed to the com­pa­ny through a mer­it award sys­tem. They al­so dis­cov­ered that in Jan­u­ary 2011, Ren­tok­il Ini­tial (Trinidad) Lim­it­ed ten­dered a bid to fur­nish, in­stall and ser­vice soap dis­pensers at Petrotrin of­fices in Pointe-a-Pierre af­ter there was an in­vi­ta­tion to ten­der by PSAEL. They dis­cov­ered that the con­tract was grant­ed to the rel­a­tive’s com­pa­ny, “notwith­stand­ing Ren­tok­il Ini­tial (Trinidad) Lim­it­ed, which has the abil­i­ty to per­form a sim­i­lar task, ten­dered a much low­er quote.”

In­ves­ti­ga­tors al­so not­ed, “There were two in­stances where based on the ten­der­ing process se­lec­tion us­ing the low­est bid­der cri­te­ria, the ser­vice providers rec­om­mend­ed were not award­ed the con­tract.”

In­ves­ti­ga­tors added that Padarath’s rel­a­tive’s com­pa­ny was award­ed the con­tract by the Fi­nance and Ten­ders Com­mit­tee notwith­stand­ing the fact the bid ten­dered was dou­bled the amount quot­ed by the oth­er ser­vice providers.

The EF­CL al­so award­ed at least 20 con­tracts to the rel­a­tive’s com­pa­ny be­tween Sep­tem­ber 2011 to Sep­tem­ber 2014. In some in­stances, in­ves­ti­ga­tors say they were un­able to say if work was done on some of the schools that the com­pa­ny was giv­en the con­tract for and stat­ed that “at least five projects in one way or the oth­er does not con­tain the rel­e­vant pay­ment in­for­ma­tion.”

Guardian Me­dia al­so asked Padarath about a $703,000 pay­ment made to his rel­a­tive’s ac­count and the on­go­ing po­lice in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to his salary when he was the PM’s aide and the in­con­sis­ten­cies in amounts de­posit­ed over the pe­ri­od of 2013-2017 in­to his per­son­al ac­count.

Padarath gave the fol­low­ing ex­pla­na­tion, “As I served as an aide, my role and re­spon­si­bil­i­ty are to deal with con­tin­gency when the prime min­is­ter trav­els. Every prime min­is­ter is pro­vid­ed with a per diem when you trav­el and placed in a cheque in your name. That is where those sums would have come from.”

Padarath added, “Sep­a­rate and apart from that, you have to ac­count when the cab­i­net re­leas­es funds to some­one hold­ing a con­tin­gency. It is not a mat­ter you get free mon­ey to spend, you have to rec­on­cile ac­counts when you re­turn to the coun­try and the Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter should have every piece of doc­u­men­ta­tion where those ac­counts are rec­on­ciled.

“When I left the Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter, every trav­el that I ac­com­pa­nied Mrs Per­sad-Bisses­sar on was rec­on­ciled with an ac­count­ing of­fi­cer who went item by item, list by list, doc­u­ment by doc­u­ment, bill by bill, to en­sure those sums were ac­count­ed for. As I said, my hands are clean. I am not both­ered by PNM machi­na­tions and in­ves­ti­ga­tions.”

How­ev­er, Guardian Me­dia ob­tained the cab­i­net notes for the pe­ri­od 2013-2015, where in­ves­ti­ga­tors pe­rused all au­tho­rised trav­el for Padarath, which in­clud­ed the amounts for trav­el and the vote from which the mon­ey was to be tak­en. They found that there was no vari­ance to the amounts dis­bursed as ap­proved by the cab­i­net to be paid.

The in­ves­ti­ga­tors con­clud­ed that the doc­u­ments “pro­vid­ed by the Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter was done and it re­vealed that there were a num­ber of vari­ances in re­spect to the amounts paid to Bar­ry Padarath when com­pared to the amounts as were ap­proved in the cab­i­net notes.”

In­ves­ti­ga­tors al­leged Padarath “earned way in ex­cess of his el­i­gi­ble re­mu­ner­a­tion dur­ing his tenure as the per­son­al aide to the prime min­is­ter.”

When ques­tioned about the vari­ances as point­ed out by the po­lice, Padarath shot back stat­ing, “That will be an is­sue that will have to be dealt with by the au­thor­i­ties in terms of cross-check­ing with the Of­fice of the Prime Min­is­ter, but as I in­di­cat­ed when I left the Of­fice of the prime min­is­ter every sin­gle trav­el was ac­count­ed for.”

Asked if he would be will­ing to co­op­er­ate if the au­thor­i­ties ap­proached him, Padarath said, “These mat­ters are in the hands of my at­tor­neys and it will be dealt with by my at­tor­neys, I am not say­ing any­thing fur­ther. Let them do their home­work.”

UNC


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored