JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Saturday, July 12, 2025

UNC scrutinises Proceeds of Crime Act legislation

Tip-off an offence in police probe

by

Gail Alexander
2126 days ago
20190915
UNC  deputy leader  David Lee

UNC deputy leader David Lee

UNC par­lia­men­tar­i­ans have been scru­ti­n­is­ing Sec­tion 51 of the Pro­ceeds of Crime Act (POCA) which stip­u­lates it’s an of­fence to tip off a per­son in an in­tend­ed or on-go­ing po­lice probe on mon­ey laun­der­ing mat­ters, UNC deputy leader David Lee has con­firmed.

This, af­ter Lee said At­tor­ney Gen­er­al Faris Al-Rawi—in cross-talk be­fore Par­lia­ment start­ed last Fri­day—warned the Op­po­si­tion that Sec­tion 51 could be “trou­ble for them.”

This fol­lowed the Prime Min­is­ter’s re­cent rev­e­la­tion that Op­po­si­tion Leader Kam­la Per­sad- Bisses­sar tipped off em­bat­tled PNM MP Mar­lene Mc­Don­ald about po­lice ac­tion against her.

Mc­Don­ald con­firmed Per­sad-Bisses­sar had called her four or five weeks be­fore she (Mc­Don­ald) was ar­rest­ed to tell her she’d be locked up. Mc­Don­ald said she sub­se­quent­ly called Al-Rawi and Na­tion­al Se­cu­ri­ty Min­is­ter Stu­art Young about it. Al-Rawi con­firmed she called him, and al­so on Au­gust 8 when po­lice searched her house. Mc­Don­ald faces sev­en al­leged cor­rup­tion charges in­clud­ing mon­ey laun­der­ing.

Fol­low­ing the claims, Per­sad- Bisses­sar hasn’t been avail­able for ques­tions or spo­ken on the is­sue. A man who an­swered her phone yes­ter­day said she wasn’t avail­able.

Last Fri­day, Lee said she was ab­sent from that day’s Par­lia­ment be­cause she had the virus. But he’d said Al-Rawi, in cross stalk with UNC’s Su­ruj Ram­bachan—be­fore the sit­ting be­gan, had said Sec­tion 51 could be “big trou­ble” for the Op­po­si­tion. Ram­bachan al­so con­firmed Al-Rawi spoke about it.

“Then we start­ed to check it (Sec­tion 51) out,” Lee added.

Sec­tion 51 of POCA has six claus­es in­clud­ing that a per­son com­mits an of­fence if (a) he knows or sus­pects that a po­lice of­fi­cer is act­ing, or is propos­ing to act, in con­nec­tion with an in­ves­ti­ga­tion which is be­ing, or is about to be, con­duct­ed in­to mon­ey laun­der­ing; and (b) he dis­clos­es to any oth­er per­son in­for­ma­tion or any oth­er mat­ter which is like­ly to prej­u­dice that in­ves­ti­ga­tion, or pro­posed in­ves­ti­ga­tion.

Al-Rawi didn’t re­ply yes­ter­day. Lee said he wasn’t a lawyer, didn’t see an is­sue with the law and couldn’t say if any­one might try to use that against Per­sad-Bisses­sar.

Lee added, “We MPs are al­ways ban­ter­ing. How many times have the Gov­ern­ment said peo­ple were com­ing to lock us up? Plan­ning Min­is­ter Camille Robin­son-Reg­is in 2017 read out a search war­rant on UNC’s Roodal Mooni­lal yet noth­ing’s hap­pened.”

In last Sat­ur­day’s po­lit­i­cal col­umn top po­lice sources said if Mc­Don­ald’s claim was true, a crim­i­nal of­fence could arise. Since ca­su­al ban­ter didn’t meet POCA’s thresh­old, they added, ques­tions need to be an­swered “ahead” - which they main­tained yes­ter­day.

UNC of­fi­cials couldn’t say if Per­sad-Bisses­sar who is a Se­nior Coun­sel, might at­tend to­day’s open­ing of the law term— a func­tion she usu­al­ly at­tends. She’s un­like­ly to at­tend the fu­ner­al of for­mer Sen­ate Pres­i­dent Lin­da Bab­hoolal this morn­ing since UNC’s Wade Mark and MP Tim Gopeesingh are rep­re­sent­ing the Op­po­si­tion, they said.

Lee said there’s no UNC Mon­day night fo­rum tonight since this is held every oth­er week and there was one last week. The next fo­rum will be next Mon­day in Diego Mar­tin.

How­ev­er, the UNC has a Pave­ment Re­port meet­ing on Wednes­day in Moru­ga. Will she at­tend that meet­ing where MPs alone are usu­al­ly the speak­ers? “You might be sur­prised...” Lee replied.

How­ev­er, Per­sad-Bisses­sar may show up at Par­lia­ment on Fri­day be­cause her pri­vate mo­tion call­ing for a de­bate to re­peal the Sedi­tion Act is ex­pect­ed to de­but on Par­lia­ment’s agen­da.

If so, Lee said Per­sad-Bisses­sar will have to de­liv­er a five-minute ad­dress ex­plain­ing why the mo­tion should be con­sid­ered and the House will have to vote on this. Gov­ern­ment has House ma­jor­i­ty.

Lee said he ex­pect­ed the mat­ter to arise par­tic­u­lar­ly since Fri­day’s sit­ting may be the last for the House of Rep­re­sen­ta­tives for the cur­rent fourth ses­sion of Par­lia­ment.

Even if the mat­ter is ap­proved for de­bate it may fall by the way­side since bills and oth­er mat­ters lapse when ses­sions change un­less ap­proved to be car­ried in­to the next term. “So if I was Gov­ern­ment I’d have ap­proved it for de­bate, just to show they’re se­ri­ous about be­ing open to ‘re­view’ the bill,” Lee said.

Gov­ern­ment of­fi­cials said they had so far seen no pro­posed al­ter­na­tives to the Sedi­tion Bill. They said Fri­day’s agen­da fo­cus­es on a na­tion­al sav­ings bond for hous­ing which will have to be de­bat­ed in Sen­ate af­ter. The ses­sion must pro­rogue by Sep­tem­ber 28 for the fifth and fi­nal ses­sion to be­gin af­ter; like­ly by the start of Oc­to­ber since the 2020 Bud­get is be­ing de­liv­ered Oc­to­ber 7.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored