JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Thursday, July 10, 2025

State to pay contractor $1.5m for ‘unauthorised’ work

by

Derek Achong
2100 days ago
20191009
The Hall of Justice, Trinidad

The Hall of Justice, Trinidad

The Min­istry of Works and Trans­port has been or­dered to pay al­most $1.5 mil­lion in com­pen­sa­tion to a con­trac­tor from San­gre Grande, who car­ried out paving works in east Trinidad in 2011 with­out a writ­ten con­tract with the min­istry. 

De­liv­er­ing a judge­ment at the Hall of Jus­tice in Port-of-Spain, on Mon­day, High Court Judge James Aboud ruled in favour of  East­ern En­gi­neer­ing and Mar­ket­ing Ser­vices. 

Aboud ruled some se­nior min­istry of­fi­cials have im­plied, in­her­ent and dis­cre­tionary pow­ers to award con­tracts with­out a com­pet­i­tive ten­der in emer­gency sit­u­a­tions. 

Aboud ruled that the State had failed to call rel­e­vant wit­ness­es who could as­sist him in de­ter­min­ing whether there was a le­git­i­mate ex­er­cise of such dis­cre­tion. 

Aboud al­so ruled that there was no ev­i­dence for him to find that there was fraud or col­lu­sion in the work and that the com­pa­ny was en­ti­tled to resti­tu­tion as the work claimed had been com­plet­ed. 

The law­suit cen­tred around work the com­pa­ny per­formed to re­pair and pave San­gre Grande Junc­tion Road, Quare Road, Tu­rure Road, To­co Road, and Paria Road. 

The work was es­ti­mat­ed to cost $299,345 per road and to­talled $1,496,725.

The com­pa­ny sub­mit­ted its in­voic­es up­on com­ple­tion but were forced to file the law­suit af­ter the min­istry re­peat­ed­ly re­fused to pay. 

In its de­fence to the claim, the min­istry claimed that al­though the per­ma­nent sec­re­tary of the min­istry is en­ti­tled to award emer­gency con­tracts that do not ex­ceed $1 mil­lion, the work per­formed by the com­pa­ny was ap­proved by an­oth­er em­ploy­ee. 

It al­so al­leged that the em­ploy­ee en­gaged the com­pa­ny with­out the ap­proval of the per­ma­nent sec­re­tary. 

“The con­tracts were award­ed with­out the knowl­edge of the per­ma­nent sec­re­tary and no ef­fort was ever made to bring this mat­ter to her at­ten­tion,” the min­istry’s lawyers said in its de­fence. 

State at­tor­neys had al­so claimed that the case should be dis­missed as it would set a “dan­ger­ous prece­dent” un­der which the gov­ern­ment would be ob­lig­at­ed to pay for goods and ser­vices that were il­le­gal­ly pro­cured. It is like­ly that the State would now ap­peal the judge­ment. 

The com­pa­ny was rep­re­sent­ed by Kelvin Ramkissoon, Leon Kalicha­ran, Reynold Wal­dropt, and Jeron Joseph.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored