DAREECE POLO
Senior Reporter
dareece.polo@guardian.co.tt
Trinidad and Tobago has recorded only two convictions for human trafficking offences, despite 85 people appearing before the courts for trafficking and related offences between 2013 and 2024, according to the Government’s submission to the United Nations Human Rights Council’s Universal Periodic Review (UPR).
The figures have raised questions about the effectiveness of investigations and prosecutions, as well as the support available to victims expected to participate in criminal proceedings.
However, former head of the Caribbean Centre for Human Rights Denise Pitcher says the low number of convictions remains deeply concerning, given the scale of trafficking she believes occurs in Trinidad and Tobago.
Pitcher questioned whether law enforcement agencies were doing enough to gather evidence and create an environment in which victims feel safe reporting offences.
“First, many trafficking victims know that members of different State agencies are involved in human trafficking. And so they are scared for their safety because they know that if they make a report, they could be victimised/targeted, right? The information could get back to whoever was involved,” Pitcher said.
“And then trafficking victims, of course, there’s the language barrier, the cultural barrier, the general attitude sometimes by the police officers themselves that discourages victims from coming forward,” she added.
Pitcher recommended that the State devote more resources to identifying and removing officers involved in criminal activity, while strengthening recruitment, training and oversight.
“Laws are one thing, right? You can have the best laws, but it’s about enforcement of the laws,” she said.
Criminologist Dr Randy Seepersad identified delays in the judicial system as another obstacle.
He said this can leave victims unwilling to continue with prosecutions.
Seepersad said some may relocate, lose interest in testifying or decide they no longer want to revisit the trauma of their experiences.
He said victims require psychological support and protection from intimidation to help them participate in prosecutions.
Seepersad also raised the possibility of legislative changes to allow recorded testimony to be admitted in court when a victim later becomes unavailable or unwilling to testify in person.
“What we have to recognise, especially among law enforcement agencies and legislators, is that you need to take every possible measure to secure that testimony from persons who are victims. They need to educate them about the harm that these perpetrators could cause on other persons. You also have to provide them with the psychological counselling that they will need to help mitigate the psychological fallout of the trafficking incident. Because if you don’t deal with that particular thing, then some of them may not be in the frame of mind ever to testify,” he said.
He acknowledged that witness protection programmes could be costly, particularly when cases take years to reach trial and witnesses require support over an extended period.
The Government’s submission forms part of T&T’s Fourth Cycle UPR, through which countries report to the UN Human Rights Council on their human rights record and commitments.
The report identifies several obstacles to securing convictions for human trafficking offences, including victims’ unwillingness to cooperate with police investigations, requests to be repatriated to their home countries or elsewhere, and the fact that victims cannot be compelled to assist with prosecutions.
It further noted that the Counter Trafficking Unit (CTU) is strengthening its evidence and intelligence-gathering capacity and conducting intelligence-led operations to dismantle trafficking networks.
The report also outlines protections available to victims under the Trafficking in Persons Act, including housing and medical assistance.
Multiple attempts were made to contact Homeland Security Minister Roger Alexander for comment, but he did not respond up to press time.
