JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Friday, August 29, 2025

Warner loses extradition appeal

by

Derek Achong
2270 days ago
20190611
Former FIFA vice-president and former National Security Minister Jack Warner.

Former FIFA vice-president and former National Security Minister Jack Warner.

For­mer Gov­ern­ment Min­is­ter Jack Warn­er has lost his ap­peal over the dis­missal of his law­suit chal­leng­ing the Unit­ed States (US) ex­tra­di­tion re­quest for him.

Three Judges of the Court of Ap­peal up­held the de­ci­sion of Jus­tice James Aboud to dis­miss his ju­di­cial re­view law­suit in Sep­tem­ber, 2017.

Their de­ci­sion does not mean that Warn­er's ex­tra­di­tion pro­ceed­ings will fi­nal­ly com­mence be­fore Chief Mag­is­trate Maria Bus­by-Ear­le-Cad­dle as the judges grant­ed a stay pend­ing the fil­ing of Warn­er's ap­peal to the Privy Coun­cil.

Warn­er is chal­leng­ing the pro­ce­dure adopt­ed by the Of­fice of the At­tor­ney Gen­er­al (AG) in sign­ing off on the US’s re­quest for his ex­tra­di­tion, made in May 2015.

Warn­er is al­leg­ing that this coun­try’s ex­tra­di­tion treaty with the US con­tra­dicts the Ex­tra­di­tion (Com­mon­wealth and For­eign Ter­ri­to­ries) Act. They were claim­ing that, in pass­ing the act, Par­lia­ment af­ford­ed cit­i­zens cer­tain pro­tec­tions which are ig­nored by the in­ter­na­tion­al treaty.

In his 50-page judge­ment, Aboud agreed that there were mi­nor in­con­sis­ten­cies be­tween the treaty and leg­is­la­tion, but said Warn­er's con­cerns were ex­ag­ger­at­ed and spec­u­la­tive.

Aboud al­so not­ed that Warn­er's rights would be pro­tect­ed dur­ing the even­tu­al ex­tra­di­tion pro­ceed­ings be­fore Bus­by-Ear­le-Cad­dle as she would have to ap­ply lo­cal laws to the charges against Warn­er al­leged in the US ex­tra­di­tion re­quest.

Warn­er was al­so com­plain­ing that AG Faris Al-Rawi failed to give his at­tor­neys a fair op­por­tu­ni­ty to make rep­re­sen­ta­tions to him be­fore he signed off on the Au­thor­i­ty to Pro­ceed, which was re­quired to kick off the pro­ceed­ings in the mag­is­trates' court.

Aboud ruled that Warn­er did not have a right to be con­sult­ed.

WARN­ER’S CASE

Warn­er, 73, a for­mer Fi­fa vice-pres­i­dent, is ac­cused of 12 charges re­lat­ed to fraud, rack­e­teer­ing and en­gag­ing in il­le­gal wire trans­fers.

The of­fences are al­leged to have tak­en place in the Unit­ed States, T&T and oth­er ju­ris­dic­tions be­tween 1990 and June 2011 when Warn­er quit Fi­fa.

He is one of sev­er­al se­nior ex­ec­u­tives of world foot­ball’s gov­ern­ing body who were in­dict­ed on a se­ries of charges af­ter an in­ves­ti­ga­tion in­to cor­rup­tion in foot­ball, con­duct­ed by the US Fed­er­al Bu­reau of In­ves­ti­ga­tion and De­part­ment of Jus­tice.

Sev­er­al have plead­ed guilty to the charges and are serv­ing sen­tences in the US.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored