JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Wednesday, August 27, 2025

Time for President Granger to concede

by

1883 days ago
20200701

We, the un­der­signed, here­by call up­on Pres­i­dent Granger and the AP­NU+AFC to im­me­di­ate­ly con­cede the elec­tion in Guyana held on March 2, to the PPP/C, and to fa­cil­i­tate the swear­ing in of Dr Ir­faan Ali as pres­i­dent of the Co-op­er­a­tive Re­pub­lic of Guyana.

What we have been wit­ness­ing over the past 121 days since Guyanese went to the polls are both a con­fir­ma­tion of the way in which de­mo­c­ra­t­ic elec­tions are sup­posed to be run, fol­lowed by an at­tempt to negate democ­ra­cy there­by thwart­ing the will of the Guyanese peo­ple.

The elec­tion it­self on March 2 was “per­haps one of the most out­stand­ing, cred­i­ble and well-run elec­tions” ever wit­nessed by most of the elec­tion ob­servers. Scru­ti­neers from all po­lit­i­cal par­ties, the Guyana Elec­tion Com­mis­sion (GECOM), along with ex­ter­nal elec­tion ob­servers from sev­er­al coun­tries, wit­nessed a process where­by all vot­ers: pro­duced pho­to iden­ti­fi­ca­tion or their Na­tion­al Iden­ti­fi­ca­tion Card; had their iden­ti­ty ver­i­fied by a Pre­sid­ing Of­fi­cer against a reg­istry of le­git­i­mate vot­ers; dipped their in­dex fin­ger in in­deli­ble ink to avoid vot­ing du­pli­ca­tion; fold­ed their bal­lot so that the vote re­mained anony­mous; and placed their vote se­cure­ly in­to an of­fi­cial bal­lot box. The elec­tion process was a cum­ber­some one, but com­mend­ably thor­ough, and every elec­tion ob­serv­er, in­clud­ing those from the two main po­lit­i­cal par­ties, was im­pressed by the cal­i­bre and com­mit­ment of the polling sta­tions’ staff and by the rel­a­tive­ly smooth way in which the en­tire elec­tion was han­dled.

The tab­u­la­tion process at each polling sta­tion was metic­u­lous, cred­i­ble and fair, ac­cord­ing to the in­cum­bent coali­tion of­fi­cials, the op­po­si­tion par­ty of­fi­cials, rep­re­sen­ta­tives of GECOM, and lo­cal and in­ter­na­tion­al ob­servers.

The State­ments of Poll (SoPs) were placed at the en­trance of each polling sta­tion, demon­strat­ing trans­paren­cy of the count. There were ten elec­toral dis­tricts and 2,339 bal­lot box­es. The re­sults of the tab­u­la­tion of votes re­vealed that 460,352 valid votes were cast in the gen­er­al elec­tion, with the PPP/C op­po­si­tion par­ty se­cur­ing 233,336 votes and the in­cum­bent AP­NU+AFC coali­tion re­ceiv­ing 217,920 votes.

This re­sult, cer­ti­fied by the GECOM, whose man­date it is to de­ter­mine the fi­nal cred­i­ble count, in­di­cat­ed that the op­po­si­tion par­ty had clear­ly won the gen­er­al elec­tion. Yet, the out­come, as the case in Guyanese elec­tions, was a sound vic­to­ry for the PPP/C.

Based on the cer­ti­fied re­sults of the polls, the PPP/C with 50.69 per cent of the vote would have 33 seats in Par­lia­ment and the AP­NU + AFC with 47.34 per cent would have 31 seats.

Yet, it was on­ly af­ter it be­came ob­vi­ous­ly from the SoPs that PPP/C had won the elec­tion that the in­cum­bent par­ty were un­hap­py with the re­sult and tried to fraud­u­lent­ly change the out­come.

For­mer prime min­is­ter of Ja­maica, Bruce Gold­ing, who ob­served the elec­tion in Guyana stat­ed that he had “nev­er seen a more trans­par­ent at­tempt to al­ter the re­sult of any elec­tion. Owen Arthur, for­mer Prime Min­is­ter of Bar­ba­dos and the Head of the Com­mon­wealth Ob­serv­er Team put on record im­me­di­ate­ly his ob­ser­va­tion that rep­re­sen­ta­tives of the AP­NU+AFC en­gaged in fraud and wide­spread rig­ging of the elec­tion, on­ly af­ter they re­alised that their par­ty was los­ing to the Op­po­si­tion.

Mia Mot­t­ley (PM of Bar­ba­dos) and Ralph Gon­salves, (PM of St Vin­cent and the Grenadines) have al­so stat­ed that the elec­tions were free and fair, and the re­count cred­i­ble.

The Carter Cen­ter, one of the most re­spect­ed or­gan­i­sa­tions when it comes to the ob­ser­vance of na­tion­al elec­tions around the globe, ques­tioned the change in the tab­u­la­tion of votes in Re­gion 4 and al­so ex­pressed con­cerns about fraud by the AP­NU+AFC coali­tion. Sim­i­lar­ly, the Or­gan­i­sa­tion of Amer­i­can States Ob­ser­va­tion Mis­sion not­ed a change in the vote count in Re­gion 4 and in a diplo­mat­ic state­ment con­clud­ed that “the process did not reach its prop­er con­clu­sion as stip­u­lat­ed in the elec­toral code.”

We note that on­ly af­ter the AP­NU+AFC re­alised it was los­ing the elec­tion did its rep­re­sen­ta­tives be­gin to com­plain about “ir­reg­u­lar­i­ties” and “fraud­u­lent votes” be­ing cast.

At­tempts were made to dis­en­fran­chise a large num­ber of vot­ers through al­le­ga­tions of vot­ing vi­o­la­tions that have not been sub­stan­ti­at­ed.

Ac­cord­ing to the Gov­ern­ment-backed Lowen­field Re­port, there are claims of breach­es in polling pro­ce­dures and al­leged vot­er im­per­son­ation. Yet, no con­crete ev­i­dence has emerged to sup­port these al­le­ga­tions. The al­leged vi­o­la­tions are of the sort that should have been caught by scru­ti­neers of all the po­lit­i­cal par­ties present dur­ing the vot­ing process and the tab­u­la­tion of the votes.

Based on all the facts of the elec­tion, in­clud­ing the even­tu­al re­count, it is ev­i­dent that the de­mo­c­ra­t­ic process in Guyana is be­ing un­der­mined by the in­cum­bent AP­NU + AFC. We, there­fore, urge the coali­tion gov­ern­ment of the AP­NU + AFC to do the right and ho­n­ourable thing and con­cede de­feat in this elec­tion.

We urge Pres­i­dent Granger and Prime Min­is­ter Nag­amootoo to prompt­ly recog­nise the PPP/C as the win­ner in this had fought and tight­ly con­test­ed elec­tion, and con­grat­u­late Dr Ir­faan Ali as the new Pres­i­dent, and Brigadier Gen (Ret’d) Mark A Phillips as the new Prime Min­is­ter in a PPP/C gov­ern­ment. It is in the in­ter­est of all Guyanese that the AP­NU-AFC fa­cil­i­tate a smooth tran­si­tion with­out fur­ther de­lay in or­der to up­hold and pre­serve de­mo­c­ra­t­ic gov­er­nance in this won­der­ful coun­try.

We take the judg­ment and words of sev­er­al Caribbean lead­ers se­ri­ous­ly. There is no rea­son to doubt the con­sen­sus opin­ion and ve­rac­i­ty of the Cari­com Ob­serv­er Team, the OAS, the Com­mon­wealth Ob­ser­va­tion Mis­sion, the Carter Cen­ter, the em­bassies and am­bas­sadors of Cana­da, Unit­ed King­dom, Eu­ro­pean Union, and the Unit­ed States. Sev­er­al in­de­pen­dent bod­ies in Guyana, in­clud­ing the Guyana Hu­man Right As­so­ci­a­tion, the George­town Cham­ber of Com­merce the Guyana Bar As­so­ci­a­tion, and even part­ners with­in the AP­NU + AFC coali­tion it­self have de­ter­mined that the 2020 elec­tion was free and fair, and that the re­count was cred­i­ble.

As Caribbean schol­ars and schol­ars with an in­ter­est in the re­gion, ded­i­cat­ed to the pro­duc­tion of au­then­tic and so­cial­ly re­spon­si­ble knowl­edge in our re­gion and be­yond, we feel com­pelled to call on the AP­NU + AFC to im­me­di­ate­ly demit of­fice and have the right­ful win­ner, Dr Ifraan Ali sworn in as pres­i­dent, so that the PPP/C can get on with gov­ern­ing Guyana at a crit­i­cal time in its his­to­ry.


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored