Mariano Browne
The Minister of Finance will deliver his Mid-Year Budget Review on June 15. It will review the Government’s revenue and expenditure position for the six months ended March 31. Its purpose is to assess the country’s fiscal performance halfway through the fiscal year and, if necessary, introduce a Finance (Supplementary Appropriation) Bill to adjust government spending and revenue allocations. Conducting this review is important for four reasons.
First, it is an important exercise in public accountability and transparency. The minister accounts to Parliament, and by extension the public, for how revenues have been spent and where and why adjustments are necessary. This is also a prelude to the 2027 Budget exercise and the programmes that will be carried over to the next year.
Second, at its simplest level, it is an exercise in budget arithmetic. The minister requests additional funds for specific ministries, state enterprises, or local government bodies facing financial shortfalls or rising operational costs. This sometimes entails shifting between ministries.
Third, the minister’s speech provides an interim overview of the country’s economic performance, the foreign exchange position, inflation, and fiscal deficit to determine whether the revenue projections were adequate. This is particularly important given the delay in the publication of official statistical data. Fourth, it is a mechanism that allows the Government to adopt new initiatives or retool existing programmes in response to changing economic conditions.
This review is highly significant, given that the 12-month economic outlook for T&T is clouded by global uncertainty stemming from the war in the Gulf. The world is where it was on April 8th: a messy ceasefire that avoids full-scale war but allows low-level conflict, with no imminent solution. The Strait of Hormuz remains closed, and energy prices have been suppressed as the US brings its strategic reserves to market. The IMF’s World Economic Outlook baseline scenario assumes that war disruptions end by July 2026, with global growth at 3.1 per cent (Trinidad and Tobago at 0.7 per cent). This looks reasonable at this stage. Things will change by the October budget speech.
However, there are matters that the minister must address. First, the price of super gasoline was reduced by $1 (14.3 per cent) in the 2026 budget speech. However, since the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, energy prices have been rising. US gasoline prices have increased by roughly 50 per cent on average since the start of the conflict in Iran in late February. The Energy Chamber calculated that in Caricom markets where prices increased, the average increase was 14.9 per cent. Fuel prices in Trinidad and Tobago remain unchanged. This suggests that while the region was not insulated from higher international prices, government pricing policies, subsidies, taxes and regulated pricing mechanisms moderated the impact.
Meanwhile, the energy trading giant Trafigura, the major supplier to the Caribbean territories, reported a 51.8 per cent net profit.
The clear inference is that imported fuel prices have increased due to changes in global conditions. Since T&T pump prices remain unchanged, one can safely conclude that they are being subsidised. There was no provision for this increased expenditure in the 2026 budget speech. Since the hostilities started on February 28, the subsidy would affect only 32 days of the midyear figures. But the price effect will continue. This means an increased subsidy for the rest of the 2026 financial year. What is the effect of this?
Similarly, the Finance Minister admitted that the backpay for the Public Services Association union agreement was not included in the 2026 estimates because he was being “conservative”, as he did not know when the agreement would be settled. Also excluded from the budget estimates were the increased National Insurance Board of Trinidad and Tobago (NIBTT) contribution rates, which took effect on January 5. The estimated figure was $3.8 billion. The Prime Minister now indicates that $2.8 billion will be included in the mid-year supplementation.
Are the new salaries in effect, and are the new NIS rates being applied? Government reports on a cash basis, meaning it accounts only for monies spent or received and ignores amounts due and unpaid. How will the backpay element be accounted for, especially since the parties are still in discussions over the amount to be paid in cash versus non-cash?
Then there are the transfers to the Statutory Authorities, of which T&TEC and WASA are the largest. The latest available financial statements for T&TEC that I was able to discover are for 2021, and the audit report was “clean.”
The statements showed an operating loss of $1.4 billion for 2021, with finance costs of $1.1 billion, and a net accumulated deficit of $10.4 billion. The simple conclusion is that T&TEC is surviving by virtue of its creditors, as its electricity rates cannot cover its costs.
WASA’s financial statements were available up to 2023, and the auditors gave a disclaimer of opinion. There was an operating loss of $556.5 million for the year after a subvention of $1.75 billion, meaning that without the subvention, the loss would have been $2.3 billion. The accumulated deficit amounted to $4.995 billion.
Water, electricity, and a properly functioning civil service are vital to a country’s survival. The simple conclusion is that not everything can be subsidised, and subsidies cannot last forever. The model that presumed the energy sector would generate the rents to finance the subsidies is over.
Mariano Browne is the CEO of the UWI Arthur Lok Jack Global School of Business
