Dattaniranjan Nandiokolmath
The overwhelming support for Afghanistan’s men’s cricket team in the 2025 ICC Champions Trophy contrasts sharply with the snubbed silencing of Afghan sportswomen, such as the taekwondo champion Marzieh Hamidi. Hamidi recently raised her voice against this exclusion. She has been living in exile in France since 2021 after the Taliban’s takeover. This anecdote calls for discussing gender apartheid in sports and the roles of society, power, and global voices.
Annie Kelly, in a The Guardian article, defined gender apartheid as “systemic oppression, discrimination and segregation of a specific group based on gender.” Pierre Bourdieu, a French sociologist, believed that sport as a field of power perpetuates existing social order, hierarchies, and inequalities. The exclusion of Afghan women from sports is an example of Bourdieu’s symbolic violence, the self-socialised acceptance of oppression that legitimises the existence of inequality.
Gender apartheid in sports is a global issue that takes on different forms in different societies. The ban on women in stadiums in Iran, the hijab bans in French sports, protests by Indian female wrestlers against sexual harassment, and sexual abuse scandals in US gymnastics are all salient examples. Such flaws do not emerge in a vacuum. These cases show that power differentials along the lines of gender within sports are caught up in patriarchal hierarchies that transcend regime differences. Sports history has seen a considerable contest against racial apartheid in sports worldwide; nevertheless, gender apartheids continue to be accepted.
Societies and sports
Societies influence acceptance of or resistance to gendered sports structures. Antonio Gramsci’s cultural hegemony concept explains how dominant gender norms persist through societal acceptance rather than force. Gender regulation in sports is deeply entrenched in social attitudes and cultural expectations. In Iran, stadium bans for women were initially normalised; however, grassroots activism eased these limitations. Conversely, Afghanistan’s complete exclusion of women from sports faces minimal domestic resistance due to ingrained patriarchal structures. The UN Women’s observation that the dropout rate in girls from sports by age 14 is twice that in boys suggests that societal expectations may be influential.
Religious principles that intersect gender norms can affect gender exclusion in sports. According to anthropologist Mary Douglas in Purity and Danger, religious interpretations can often legitimise female marginalisation by emphasising chastity and purity. However, some voices of progressive religious paths advocate inclusion. These conflicting religious perspectives illustrate how beliefs shape societal attitudes, contributing to or challenging gender apartheids in sports and public life.
Grassroots activism highlights sports’ transformative potential. As icons, female athletes push against physical and societal constraints when playing sports. This resistance resonates with Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity, which contends that gender is constructed through repeated actions. By asserting their presence in sporting spaces, women actively redefine the concept of femininity in sports, creating opportunities for a more diverse and accepting future.
Towards inclusive sporting societies
Gerda Lerner’s 1986 book, The Creation of Patriarchy, argues that control over female sexuality dates back to hunter-gatherer societies. However, in the 21st century, such systemic control over women should have no place. National sovereignty is important but should not excuse gender discrimination. The international community must adopt consistent accountability, irrespective of geopolitical considerations. Fighting gender equality in sports requires institutional action and societal engagement. The practice of gender-based bias in sports reinforces the notion that women are peripheral, perpetuating impacts beyond sports. This discrimination not only undermines the physical, psychological, and social aspirations of the female population but also hinders the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).
In order to dismantle entrenched norms, societies must initiate a cultural shift. Franz Boas’ philosophy of cultural relativism is essential; however, sustainable efforts to balance cultural aspects and aspirations must be managed. Some reforms may include special women’s sports courts, cross-country talent transfers, affirmative religious collaborations, equitable media representation, and moderating societal values with sports rules. It is crucial to move beyond the mindset of victimisation and implement changes within sports structures that align with evolving societal norms. Educational initiatives can play a determining role by defying stereotypes and promoting gender equality at a younger age. Media, religious, and cultural institutions must actively reshape women’s narratives in sports, portraying them as integral contributors to the sports environment.
In ‘The Way She Moves’ (2007), on gender spaces, Shilpa Ranade observed that gender norms are reproduced through everyday spatial practices, suggesting that changing how women use public spaces could impact gender discrimination over time. As a public space, sports have an explosive potential to break gender apartheid. All sports spaces must accommodate gender participation. As we celebrate International Women’s Day this year, the journey towards gender equality is laborious. Still, a fair and just sporting world is within reach with accelerated and sustained effort and collective will.
Dattaniranjan Nandiokolmath is a Doctoral Student in Anthropology at Karnatak University, Dharwad, India
