JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 14, 2025

Promising players stagnate; the money issue dominates–Jeffrey Dujon

by

Renardo Brown
205 days ago
20241222

Over his 11-year ca­reer which end­ed in 1991, Jef­frey Du­jon nev­er played in a West In­dies crick­et team that lost a Test se­ries. Dur­ing that pe­ri­od, the West In­dies won 15, with sev­en drawn in their 23 Test se­ries. Du­jon al­so played in a lim­it­ed overs team that won 14 straight se­ries be­tween 1980 and 1988. It is by far the most suc­cess­ful pe­ri­od in the team’s his­to­ry and ac­cord­ing to Du­jon “hold­ing each oth­er ac­count­able was key to the suc­cess of the side.

“I was so for­tu­nate, first of all, to be in a win­ning en­vi­ron­ment to start my ca­reer. And to be around so many great play­ers, and it was a team,” stress­es the wick­et-keep­er/bats­man, ar­guably the best ever for the West In­dies.

“You might be very sur­prised to know that not many of us used to hang out to­geth­er off the field. But you see when the um­pire said time, then it was a very, very sol­id unit every time.”–a les­son in co­he­sion to­wards a pur­pose.

Since the turn in­to the 2000s, the West In­dies have man­aged to win on­ly 22 of 85 con­test­ed Test se­ries, los­ing 52 of those.

Du­jon, who ap­peared as a com­men­ta­tor fol­low­ing his re­tire­ment from in­ter­na­tion­al crick­et, be­lieves the cur­rent struc­ture of re­gion­al crick­et is not pro­vid­ing the qual­i­ty need­ed to im­prove the in­ter­na­tion­al team.

“You have play­ers, even in my time, they come on­to the scene and they do well and then all of a sud­den, they stop do­ing well.”

The rea­son, he says; they be­come stag­nat­ed.

“The longer you play, the more peo­ple you play against, the more your weak­ness­es get iden­ti­fied and you have to un­der­stand what they are and how to work on them; this is the on­ly way that you can have a good chance of be­ing con­sis­tent,” ob­serves Du­jon.

Two sto­ries of two West In­di­an bats­men need to be told re­gard­ing learn­ing on the pitch. The great George Headley went to Aus­tralia as a pre­dom­i­nant­ly off-side bats­man. He scored a num­ber of big runs in­clud­ing a cou­ple cen­turies. The Aus­tralian bowlers caught on and kept the ball away from his favourite strokes. A se­ries of low scores fol­lowed. Headley recog­nised what was hap­pen­ing and worked on his on­side game to the point that the great Aus­tralian leg-spin­ner, Clar­rie Grim­mett, named Headley as the great­est on­side play­er he ever bowled to. More re­cent­ly, Lar­ry Gomes al­so found his on­side play want­i­ng, he went to the nets to cor­rect the flaw.

Du­jon adds that the qual­i­ty of skill is sim­ply not there: “In re­gion­al crick­et, the lit­tle bit that I have watched re­cent­ly, you get, say, three balls an over that you can re­al­ly score off.

“In Test crick­et, you might get one, every two overs. And in that time, you are be­ing ex­am­ined by the bet­ter bowlers, and they find out where is the best place to keep you qui­et and where they can frus­trate you.” In his view from be­hind and in front the stumps, “even­tu­al­ly, you get your­self out be­cause good balls very rarely get bats­men out, bats­men get them­selves out. And it's a lack of pa­tience, lack of con­cen­tra­tion, lack of aware­ness of what's go­ing on.”–a les­son for the cur­rent WI bats­men who through­out the T20 se­ries against the non-lethal bowl­ing of the Bangladeshi team, chased wide balls and played atro­cious shots im­me­di­ate­ly they ar­rived at the stumps.

The wick­et-keep­er to the great WI de­mon bowlers be­lieves that crick­et in the var­i­ous ter­ri­to­ries across the re­gion is weak, “so, one of the things I think that's miss­ing now is that the club sys­tem is not what it used to be. And I don't know if the knowl­edge of the game has been passed down to the sub­se­quent gen­er­a­tions the way it used to be. Added to the fact now that some of these guys play the game, but for a dif­fer­ent rea­son.”

Du­jon says the glo­ri­fi­ca­tion of T20 crick­et and oth­er white-ball vari­a­tions is eat­ing away at the core val­ues of rep­re­sen­ta­tive crick­et, at least in the West In­dies.

“You know, es­pe­cial­ly the young guys, be­cause they're look­ing at all the mon­ey that's at the end of the road, the in­ter­est in un­der­stand­ing the game is not there. When I played I nev­er played for mon­ey; I played for the love of the game.

“Quite a num­ber of them, in my ex­pe­ri­ence, you try to pass your ex­pe­ri­ences and knowl­edge down and they don't re­al­ly want to lis­ten.

“It’s the mon­ey com­ing in­to crick­et be­cause a lot of these guys be­lieve that they have al­ready ar­rived be­cause they're mak­ing a liv­ing out of the game. And hence, you know, they don't think they have to im­prove.”

The right-hand­ed bats­man who scored five Test cen­turies in a line-up of great bats­men, did quite an amount of coach­ing af­ter re­tire­ment points to his first-hand ac­count of deal­ing with con­tem­po­rary play­ers: “I've ex­pe­ri­enced that per­son­al­ly, where I'd be try­ing to talk to young play­ers, try­ing to pass on some­thing to help them and they're just wait­ing for you to fin­ish talk­ing. So, you know, that's one of the frus­tra­tions that I've had which is why I'm re­al­ly no longer in­volved in the game.”

There are lessons to be learnt and chal­lenges to be re­spond­ed to by those who ad­min­is­ter Crick­et West In­dies (CWI) giv­en by one who was part of the great­est ever crick­et team.

Sunil Ramdeen – for­mer news jour­nal­ist, cur­rent ra­dio com­men­ta­tor on crick­et

I think this stale­mate is in it­self the clear­est ex­am­ple of why there is need for gov­er­nance re­form. Michael Jack­son prob­a­bly de­scribed the dilem­ma best; ‘I'm start­ing with the man in the mir­ror, I'm ask­ing him to change his ways.’ Clear­ly, the col­lec­tive ‘man’ has very dif­fer­ent views on what needs to be done to ‘change his ways.’

The ab­stain­ing mem­bers have said the ‘two pro­posed amend­ments that were to be tabled by CWI at the abort­ed meet­ing of De­cem­ber 6, 2024, were self-serv­ing and can­not and will not change the many is­sues af­fect­ing West In­dies crick­et both ad­min­is­tra­tive­ly and on the field of play’.

At the same time though, they pro­mot­ed on their own po­si­tion of ‘the in­tro­duc­tion of a ro­tat­ing pres­i­dent and a long-term crick­et de­vel­op­ment plan.’ The CWI lead­er­ship on hand has in­sist­ed that the meet­ing would have marked 'a crit­i­cal junc­ture in CWI’s on­go­ing ef­forts to strength­en its gov­er­nance struc­ture and po­si­tion West In­dies crick­et for fu­ture suc­cess.’ Let’s re­mem­ber as well that in March the CWI pres­i­dent did re­veal that ‘some res­o­lu­tions did not find favour with the ma­jor­i­ty on this oc­ca­sion,’ but that he re­mained ‘com­mit­ted to en­sur­ing that CWI gov­er­nance struc­ture is al­ways at its most ro­bust.”

So clear­ly any con­ver­sa­tions/di­a­logue/ne­go­ti­a­tions in the sub­se­quent months were un­able to find com­mon ground. The fact is that ‘change’ is re­quired, and go­ing for­ward, full trans­paren­cy is go­ing to be crit­i­cal. Maybe the full agen­da of items for rat­i­fi­ca­tion and dis­cus­sion should be made pub­lic; that these are the four or five items up for dis­cus­sion, al­low them to mar­i­nate in the pub­lic for a cou­ple of weeks so that com­men­ta­tors, past play­ers, ad­min­is­tra­tors, fans and all stake­hold­ers can of­fer their opin­ions and feed­back, and then set a date for a meet­ing.

In that way, no one can use the ‘agen­da’ as an ex­cuse for not be­ing present, be­cause we would all know what it is, and the ‘con­stituents’ of these rep­re­sen­ta­tives would have been able to par­tic­i­pate in the process that im­pacts all who ral­ly ‘round the West In­dies.

An­dre Lawrence – crick­et an­a­lyst and coach

An­dre places his sharp fo­cus on three main ar­eas which he be­lieves will re­sult in a de­cid­ed im­prove­ment in West In­dies crick­et based on ques­tions put to him by the Sun­day Guardian.

One, the gov­er­nance struc­ture of re­gion­al crick­et must change. Cur­rent­ly, an 18-mem­ber team re­sem­bles that of an old-school crick­et club of the 60s. A small­er board of say one del­e­gate each from the six ter­ri­to­r­i­al boards, along with a few nom­i­nat­ed pro­fes­sion­als re­port­ing to a vice and chair­per­son will add a much greater lev­el of com­pe­ten­cy to the board. In short, run it more like a busi­ness en­ter­prise. The pro­posed gov­er­nance changes will make it eas­i­er for West In­dies crick­et to be seen as a “pub­lic good” rather than a pri­vate op­er­a­tion led by a cho­sen few.

Two, there must be a sig­nif­i­cant in­vest­ment in youth acad­e­mies and the cer­ti­fi­ca­tion of the same. Long gone is the need for ded­i­cat­ed and cer­ti­fied pro­fes­sion­als guid­ing the vast tal­ent that ex­ists among the youth of the re­gion. The in­ter­na­tion­al game is mov­ing at warp speed, while WI crick­et de­vel­op­ment is me­an­der­ing along at a snail’s pace.

Three, re­vi­tal­i­sa­tion of club crick­et is para­mount to the de­vel­op­ment of young pro­fes­sion­als pri­or to en­trance on­to the world stage. At present, our club play­ers are ar­riv­ing on the in­ter­na­tion­al scene se­vere­ly un­der­de­vel­oped and at­tempt­ing to learn the game on the job, hence the glar­ing spo­radic-like per­for­mances and re­sults.

To help this, an amend­ment of the con­sti­tu­tion of the ter­ri­to­r­i­al boards will en­sure that one en­ti­ty can­not rule and with­out suc­cess, for any length of time with­out be­ing held ac­count­able.

(Tony Rakhal-Fras­er con­tributed to his sto­ry)


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored