From September 2, 2025—which was the day of the first US strike on vessels in the Southern Caribbean that were alleged to be carrying illegal drugs and narcotraffickers—T&T Prime Minister Kamla Persad-Bissessar embraced the new American policy of dealing with maritime craft in this region.
Asked about the strike, which allegedly killed 11 people on board the vessel, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio on September 2 described the operation as a counter-drug mission aimed at destabilising cartels operating with impunity in the region.
“These particular drugs were probably headed to Trinidad or some other country in the Caribbean, at which point they just contribute to the instability these countries are facing,” Rubio said.
In a WhatsApp response to Guardian Media on September 2, Persad-Bissessar came out in full support of the US action saying, “I, along with most of the country, am happy that the US naval deployment is having success in their mission. The US government has repeatedly said that going after the drug cartels was its objective and they have begun to deliver. Illegally trafficked drugs and arms have caused death and destruction in our society over the last 25 years...
“The slaughter of our people is fuelled by evil cartel traffickers. The pain and suffering the cartels have inflicted on our nation is immense. I have no sympathy for traffickers. The US military should kill them all violently.”
The Prime Minister added that the restriction of illegal guns, drugs and human trafficking will decrease violence in the region and, in particular, in this country.
“May God bless and protect the members of the US military who are engaged in the drug interdiction mission. Their efforts will save many lives in our country and the region,” she said.
The point here is that the T&T Prime Minister was the first leader of a third-party, sovereign nation to come out vigorously in support of what came to be known as US kinetic strikes on alleged drug boats in the Southern Caribbean.
And while international law scholars, human rights activists and politicians around the world condemned the strikes as extrajudicial and illegal killings, Mrs Persad-Bissessar never wavered in her support of the US action.
In fact, in her speech to the United Nations General Assembly in New York on September 26, 2025, she appeared to double down in her support of the strikes.
“While there have been objections to the US military action against drug cartels in the southern Caribbean, some objections from some countries, I state today, Trinidad and Tobago reminds the international community that unless forceful and aggressive actions are taken, these evil drug cartels will continue their societal destruction because they believe affected nations will always unreservedly subscribe to morals and ethics and human rights and values which they themselves blatantly flout.”
Emphasising that criminals do not adhere to ethics and morality, Mrs Persad-Bissessar added, “Therefore, we will fight fire with fire within the law. That is why we willingly supported the international security alliance announced by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, involving the US and several countries in South America and, of course, including Trinidad and Tobago, to combat drug trafficking in the hemisphere.”
What has T&T’s support yielded?
On September 30, the T&T Prime Minister met with Mr Rubio at his offices in Washington DC. After that meeting, the US Department of State put out a readout attributed to Mr Rubio that outlined as follows, “The Secretary acknowledged the importance of energy security to Trinidad and Tobago’s economic prosperity and regional stability. He outlined US support for the government’s Dragon gas proposal and steps to ensure it will not provide significant benefit to the Maduro regime.”
In a statement issued several hours after the meeting, the Office of the Prime Minister announced that the US government now supports Trinidad and Tobago’s efforts to develop cross-border hydrocarbon resources.
“Subsequent to the meeting, the Government of Trinidad and Tobago was informed that the Secretary of State supports the approval of the relevant Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) licences to begin discussions toward developing its cross-border hydrocarbons,” the statement read.
The US Department of Treasury, on October 8, granted T&T and wholly state-owned National Gas Company (NGC) a six-month OFAC licence allowing the pursuit of the development of the Dragon gas field.
In announcing the T&T Government’s receipt of the OFAC licence on October 9, Attorney General, John Jeremie went out of his way to disclose that the grant of the licence “was based upon the request dated May 19, 2025, and supplemental information provided on diverse dates in June and July 2025.”
The point conveyed by Mr Jeremie was that it was the current administration, elected on April 28, 2025, that applied for the OFAC licence.
But, it seems to me, that the grant of the OFAC licence to the Government led by Mrs Persad-Bissessar must raise questions about why the Trump administration revoked OFAC licences for the Dragon and Cocuina natural gas fields in April 2025:
It is noteworthy that Stuart Young was sworn in as prime minister on March 17, 2025. He had the widely reported bilateral meeting with Mr Rubio in Kingston, Jamaica, on March 26, and the OFAC licences were revoked on April 8. Mr Rubio had a conversation with Mr Young on April 18, according to a report on the Department of State website. In that conversation, Mr Rubio “recognised that energy security is important to Trinidad and Tobago’s prosperity and economy. Any outcomes of sanctions upon the Maduro regime and Venezuela is in no way indicative of our relationship with Trinidad and Tobago and the value we place on it.”
One would imagine that their meeting on March 26—before the revocation of the OFAC licences—and the telephone conversation on April 18, after the revocation—would both have focused on Dragon gas.
It is, therefore, also noteworthy that Mr Rubio called Mrs Persad-Bissessar “to congratulate her on being elected” on May 2, 2025.
“They discussed strengthening our partnership to advance regional security and mutual priorities. The Secretary reaffirmed the United States’ strong and enduring partnership with Trinidad and Tobago, grounded in deep historic ties and shared goals for regional security and prosperity,” according to the US State Department’s readout of the discussion.
Questions:
1) Why would the US Government revoke the two OFAC licences granted to T&T’s previous administration, but decide to provide the current administration with a six-month Dragon gas OFAC licence?
2) Did Mr Rubio perceive Mrs Persad-Bissessar to be more in line with the US thinking than Mr Young?
3) What changed in the US sanctions regime against Venezuela between the revocation of the two OFAC licences on April 8, under the People’s National Movement administration, and the grant of the short-term OFAC licence to the United National Congress administration on October 8?
3) What was the nature of the discussion between the US Secretary of State and the current T&T Prime Minister on “strengthening our partnership to advance regional security” and on the “shared goals for regional security?”
4) Did the T&T Prime Minister make any firm commitment to Mr Rubio on “strengthening our partnership to advance regional security?”
5) What progress have the Government and NGC made on advancing the Dragon gas project, since the signing of the OFAC licence on October 8?
6) Has the NGC identified the US companies that the OFAC licence for the Dragon field stipulates must benefit from the development of the gas field?
7) Does the T&T Government plan to reach out to Mr Rubio to continue lobbying for a green light for Dragon gas?
8) In December, the current interim President of Venezuela, Delcy Rodriguez, blamed Prime Minister Persad-Bissessar for facilitating the seizure of a Venezuelan oil tanker. Ms Rodriguez decided to immediately break off all negotiations and contracts with T&T for the supply of natural gas.
“This official has turned the territory of Trinidad and Tobago into a US aircraft carrier to attack Venezuela, in an unequivocal act of subservience. Given her complicity in stealing oil, the Bolivarian Government of President Nicolás Maduro is terminating any contract or negotiation that involves the supply of gas to this neighbouring country,” said Ms Rodriguez, according to the El Pais website.
Given this harsh rhetoric, who in Venezuela does the T&T Government speak to about Dragon gas?
