JavaScript is disabled in your web browser or browser is too old to support JavaScript. Today almost all web pages contain JavaScript, a scripting programming language that runs on visitor's web browser. It makes web pages functional for specific purposes and if disabled for some reason, the content or the functionality of the web page can be limited or unavailable.

Monday, July 14, 2025

Analysis shows Trump’s tariffs would cost US employers $82.3 billion

by

11 days ago
20250702
President Donald Trump

President Donald Trump

An analy­sis finds that a crit­i­cal group of U.S. em­ploy­ers would face a di­rect cost of $82.3 bil­lion from Pres­i­dent Don­ald Trump’s cur­rent tar­iff plans, a sum that could be po­ten­tial­ly man­aged through price hikes, lay­offs, hir­ing freezes or low­er prof­it mar­gins.

The analy­sis by the JP­Mor­gan­Chase In­sti­tute is among the first to mea­sure the di­rect costs cre­at­ed by the im­port tax­es on busi­ness­es with $10 mil­lion to $1 bil­lion in an­nu­al rev­enue, a cat­e­go­ry that in­cludes rough­ly a third of pri­vate-sec­tor U.S. work­ers. These com­pa­nies are more de­pen­dent than oth­er busi­ness­es on im­ports from Chi­na, In­dia and Thai­land — and the re­tail and whole­sale sec­tors would be es­pe­cial­ly vul­ner­a­ble to the im­port tax­es be­ing levied by the Re­pub­li­can pres­i­dent.

The find­ings show clear trade-offs from Trump’s im­port tax­es, con­tra­dict­ing his claims that for­eign man­u­fac­tur­ers would ab­sorb the costs of the tar­iffs in­stead of U.S. com­pa­nies that re­ly on im­ports. While the tar­iffs launched un­der Trump have yet to boost over­all in­fla­tion, large com­pa­nies such as Ama­zon, Cost­co, Wal­mart and Williams-Sono­ma de­layed the po­ten­tial reck­on­ing by build­ing up their in­ven­to­ries be­fore the tax­es could be im­posed.

The analy­sis comes just ahead of the Ju­ly 9 dead­line by Trump to for­mal­ly set the tar­iff rates on goods from dozens of coun­tries. Trump im­posed that dead­line af­ter the fi­nan­cial mar­kets pan­icked in re­sponse to his April tar­iff an­nounce­ments, prompt­ing him to in­stead sched­ule a 90-day ne­go­ti­at­ing pe­ri­od when most im­ports faced a 10% base­line tar­iff. Chi­na, Mex­i­co and Cana­da face high­er rates, and there are sep­a­rate 50% tar­iffs on steel and alu­minum.

Had the ini­tial April 2 tar­iffs stayed in place, the com­pa­nies in the JP­Mor­gan­Chase In­sti­tute analy­sis would have faced ad­di­tion­al di­rect costs of $187.6 bil­lion. Un­der the cur­rent rates, the $82.3 bil­lion would be equiv­a­lent on av­er­age to $2,080 per em­ploy­ee, or 3.1% of the av­er­age an­nu­al pay­roll. Those av­er­ages in­clude firms that don’t im­port goods and those that do.

Asked Tues­day how trade talks are far­ing, Trump said sim­ply: “Every­thing’s go­ing well.”

The pres­i­dent has in­di­cat­ed that he will set tar­iff rates giv­en the lo­gis­ti­cal chal­lenge of ne­go­ti­at­ing with so many na­tions. As the 90-day pe­ri­od comes to a close, on­ly the Unit­ed King­dom has signed a trade frame­work with the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion. In­dia and Viet­nam have sig­naled that they’re close to a trade frame­work.

There is a grow­ing body of ev­i­dence sug­gest­ing that more in­fla­tion could sur­face. The in­vest­ment bank Gold­man Sachs said in a re­port that it ex­pects com­pa­nies to pass along 60% of their tar­iff costs on­to con­sumers. The At­lanta Fed­er­al Re­serve has used its sur­vey of busi­ness­es’ in­fla­tion ex­pec­ta­tions to say that com­pa­nies could on av­er­age pass along rough­ly half their costs from a 10% tar­iff or a 25% tar­iff with­out re­duc­ing con­sumer de­mand.

The JP­Mor­gan­Chase In­sti­tute find­ings sug­gest that the tar­iffs could cause some do­mes­tic man­u­fac­tur­ers to strength­en their roles as sup­pli­ers of goods. But it not­ed that com­pa­nies need to plan for a range of pos­si­ble out­comes and that whole­salers and re­tail­ers al­ready op­er­ate on such low prof­it mar­gins that they might need to spread the tar­iffs costs to their cus­tomers.

The out­look for tar­iffs re­mains high­ly un­cer­tain. Trump had stopped ne­go­ti­a­tions with Cana­da, on­ly to restart them af­ter the coun­try dropped its plan to tax dig­i­tal ser­vices. He sim­i­lar­ly on Mon­day threat­ened more tar­iffs on Japan un­less it buys more rice from the U.S.

Trea­sury Sec­re­tary Scott Bessent said in a Tues­day in­ter­view that the con­ces­sions from the trade talks have im­pressed ca­reer of­fi­cials at the Of­fice of the U.S. Trade Rep­re­sen­ta­tive and oth­er agen­cies.

“Peo­ple who have been at Trea­sury, at Com­merce, at US­TR for 20 years are say­ing that these are deals like they’ve nev­er seen be­fore,” Bessent said on Fox News Chan­nel’s “Fox & Friends.”

The trea­sury sec­re­tary said the Trump ad­min­is­tra­tion plans to dis­cuss the con­tours of trade deals next week, pri­or­i­tiz­ing the tax cuts pack­age passed on Tues­day by the Re­pub­li­can ma­jor­i­ty in the Sen­ate. Trump has set a Fri­day dead­line for pas­sage of the mul­ti­tril­lion-dol­lar pack­age, the costs of which the pres­i­dent hopes to off­set with tar­iff rev­enues.

By JOSH BOAK

WASH­ING­TON (AP)


Related articles

Sponsored

Weather

PORT OF SPAIN WEATHER

Sponsored